Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and CyberArk are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while CyberArk is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.6% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to CyberArk’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of CyberArk users who would recommend it.
Check Point Harmony SASE (f...
Read 62 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reviews
  • 6,231 Views
  • 374 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews
  • 3,979 Views
  • 1,233 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in the cybersecurity sector. CyberArk seems to have the upper hand in privilege management, while Check Point excels in network access flexibility.

Features: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager includes DNS scanning, lifecycle management, and policies for elevated app access. It also offers password management, session recording, and application control. Check Point Harmony SASE provides zero-trust network access, unified policy management, and advanced threat prevention with user-friendly access control.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk needs better integration with PAM tools, enhanced reporting, and improved technical support. There's also a call for better onboarding and diverse OS integration. Check Point Harmony SASE could improve with more granular control options, better integration with existing security solutions, and enhanced user notifications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk is suitable for on-premises or cloud environments but poses support challenges, especially for non-certified users. Check Point Harmony SASE performs well in hybrid cloud environments with reliable support but can be hard to reach for smaller issues.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive, with high costs for user accounts and sessions, suited for large organizations. Check Point Harmony SASE offers flexible pricing, suitable for larger companies looking for comprehensive security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.3
Check Point Harmony SASE boosts security, productivity, and efficiency while reducing costs, enhancing remote work and incident management.
Sentiment score
7.1
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances security, reduces risks and costs, saves resources, and protects sensitive information effectively.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report
Deploying CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has secured the infrastructure, which saves money, time, and resources.
I consider CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager's return on investment to be good since it effectively accomplishes the goals expected from privilege access management solutions.
For more quotes and insights, download the CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report
Nasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewerAjinkya Mohod - PeerSpot reviewerSumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
DR
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Check Point Harmony SASE receives mixed feedback, with users praising support responsiveness but noting occasional delays and escalation needs.
Sentiment score
6.2
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager support is knowledgeable but needs improvements in response times, accessibility, and first-level assistance.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
After updating firmware, data utilization was visible for a few days before collapsing again.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report
They respond immediately to our inquiries, resolve issues promptly, and provide valuable guidance, especially in critical situations.
We engage them when needed and receive prompt responses that typically resolve our issues.
Earlier, we received support for normal tickets within a day, but now it takes one or two days to resolve issues.
For more quotes and insights, download the CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report
Nasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2751366 - PeerSpot reviewerNareshKumar9 - PeerSpot reviewerJayasree Sriram - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2600361 - PeerSpot reviewerSumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Harmony SASE offers scalable, cloud-native network security ideal for dynamic workforces, with easy expansion and implementation.
Sentiment score
7.7
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager efficiently scales for large deployments, praised for growth-centered architecture despite integration complexities.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
The scalability of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is good, and I can add more users and devices easily as my organization grows.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report
We can set permissions per team or department, allowing some teams to elevate specific applications while others have different permissions.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is quite scalable.
The available reports and other security tools assist in scaling it according to my organization's needs.
For more quotes and insights, download the CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report
Nasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewerNareshKumar9 - PeerSpot reviewerAjinkya Mohod - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2600361 - PeerSpot reviewerJayasree Sriram - PeerSpot reviewer
GH
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Check Point Harmony SASE is praised for reliability and security, though some experience occasional connectivity issues and suggest optimizations.
Sentiment score
8.2
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is stable, with 99.99% uptime, reliable on Windows, needing console improvements and minimal memory.
Even the support team does not have a proper solution for this issue.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report
It is a robust solution that has effectively supported our environment without major issues.
Since implementing it, we have not experienced any outages or stability issues.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers multiple options for creating and stopping policies.
For more quotes and insights, download the CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report
NareshKumar9 - PeerSpot reviewerAjinkya Mohod - PeerSpot reviewerEmir Sozer - PeerSpot reviewerJayasree Sriram - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2600361 - PeerSpot reviewerSumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Harmony SASE needs enhanced customization, integration, user interface, performance, and advanced features to improve overall efficiency.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager needs improved integration, user interface, and pricing, along with enhanced compatibility and functionality.
An example of when the support cycle took longer than expected was when I had a ticket open for nearly six to seven months regarding a simple issue.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications.
Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console.
Some features provided in the self-hosted version of EPM are not supported in the software as a service version, like connection to some analysis applied by Palo Alto.
For more quotes and insights, download the CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report
NareshKumar9 - PeerSpot reviewerEmir Sozer - PeerSpot reviewerNasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2600361 - PeerSpot reviewerSumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewerMarek Neumann - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Harmony SASE offers flexible, clear pricing, starting at $30 per license, suitable for larger organizations with discounts available.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager's high pricing is justified by its quality, features, and appeal to large enterprises in finance.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
It is a bit expensive.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is that it is a rental service, but I find it satisfactory.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions.
I've received feedback that the pricing is high, however, for me, the value it brings is worth the cost.
For more quotes and insights, download the CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report
Emir Sozer - PeerSpot reviewerAjinkya Mohod - PeerSpot reviewerNareshKumar9 - PeerSpot reviewer
GH
Sumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
PH
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Harmony SASE offers unified security with Zero Trust Network Access, centralized management, and user-centric design for enhanced productivity.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances security by managing privileges, integrating seamlessly, and preventing ransomware while ensuring regulatory compliance.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager effectively reduces malicious content in applications by allowing us to identify and block dangerous applications.
It allows them to granularly manage controls to prevent some malicious activities on the endpoint machine.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances computer security by providing minimal access, effectively preventing ransomware attacks.
For more quotes and insights, download the CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report
Ajinkya Mohod - PeerSpot reviewerNasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2751366 - PeerSpot reviewerJayasree Sriram - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1247523 - PeerSpot reviewer
GH
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (6th), Firewalls (15th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (4th), ZTNA (2nd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (5th)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (5th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (3rd), Application Control (5th), Ransomware Protection (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 1.6%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Anti-Malware Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.
Read full review
Sumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights
There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?
Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?
It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options wit...
See all answers
Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
See all answers
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 10% of the time
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 9% of the time
Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 8% of the time
Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 7% of the time
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 6% of the time
More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors
CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 17% of the time
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 14% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 10% of the time
Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 5% of the time
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
August 2025
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reportDownload Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
August 2025
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reportDownload CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report
 

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE
Viewfinity
 

Overview

Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.

Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?

  • Split Tunneling: Manages internet traffic more efficiently by routing only necessary data through the VPN.
  • MFA: Provides an additional layer of security through multi-factor authentication.
  • Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure connections by validating every user and device.
  • ThreatCloud: Enhances protection with real-time threat intelligence.
  • Firewall as a Service: Protects against unauthorized access and threats.
  • Secure Web Gateway: Prevents phishing attacks and unauthorized internet access.

How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?

  • Improved Security: Real-time threat intelligence and robust authentication minimize risks.
  • Centralized Management: Simplifies control over network security and policies.
  • Optimized Connectivity: Efficient traffic routing enhances user experience.
  • Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing IT infrastructure, enhancing strategic security deployment.

Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk
 

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
July 2025
Free Report: Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.