Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Xshield comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
85
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Container Security (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Compliance Management (5th)
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (7th), Cloud and Data Center Security (8th), Container Management (7th), Container Security (7th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (4th), Compliance Management (4th)
Xshield
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
40th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Microsegmentation Software (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.1%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is 2.5%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Xshield is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
Unique Categories:
Vulnerability Management
1.4%
Cloud and Data Center Security
2.2%
Microsegmentation Software
0.9%
 

Featured Reviews

AP
Jun 5, 2024
Precise, integrates well, and helps consolidate security solutions
SentinelOne Singularity Complete helps consolidate security solutions. There is a hot discussion about the future of the Security Operations Center. Security Operations Centers generally use SIEM and SOAR, but SentinelOne Singularity XDR can also help there because you can see what is happening not only on the endpoints but also in the network. In other words, you can replace the NDR solution. We also see it going all the way to include all the clouds. This ecosystem is very important to us. In the near future, we see it being used for all the problems related to detection and response in cybersecurity. Our customers use the Ranger functionality. There are two Ranger versions. There is Ranger AD, and there is Ranger Pro. SentinelOne Singularity platform has its own security ecosystem. You do not have the need to buy other solutions. For example, we sell a ZTNA solution. If you have ZTNA, you do not need to buy a PAM solution. You do not need to buy a NAC solution. The ZTNA technology has replaced all the other solutions. It is the same thing with Singularity. If you buy the ecosystem of Singularity, you do not need to buy several different technologies. Ranger can do all the hardware inventory. It can point out the versions of the operating systems and then you can apply patching to update the versions of the operating systems. You can use Ranger in different ways. For a security professional, it is a very powerful tool. It sends you alerts and warnings about possible incidents, but you do not get too many false positives. It is precise. You get real information about an incident. It is very important to have good hygiene of your endpoints and your network. The uptime of the endpoints and networks is very important. SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides a good uptime. Incident identification is very important and having fewer false positives is also important. The SOC staff knows that if SentinelOne Singularity points out an incident, they have to pay attention to the threat. It is a very good checker. SentinelOne Singularity Complete reduces the organization's risk.
Prateek Agarwal - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 26, 2024
A reliable platform for protecting and monitoring cloud-native applications
Previously, we did not have a cloud-native security solution. After implementing Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP, we found that our cloud-native applications are running very well. It is reliable, and all unwanted security threats are now blocked. We have complete peace of mind about our cloud-native applications. It took us seven to eight months to realize its benefits. We use CloudGuard CNAPP's Cloud Security Posture Management capabilities. They are very helpful. There is run-time protection. Actionable security is one of the main features. If we already have policy configurations within our applications, it does not affect our existing policies. We can easily configure the settings and the related functionalities. It provides flexibility. Cloud Security Posture Management identifies the risks that are most critical to our business. We have identified high risks, medium risks, and low risks. It can provide risk management for all three categories. We generally have high-risk and medium-risk vulnerabilities with us. The time savings vary from risk to risk. It typically gets resolved within a day or at the most within two days. We use CloudGuard CNAPP's CloudGuard Workload Protection capabilities. It has full integration capabilities with all the containers within the file systems. It is fully capable of integrating with any medium and providing the best security solutions. The scanning provided by CloudGuard Workload Protection helps us identify problems before they go live. It helps with pre-analysis. It gives us a pre-analysis report before running things in production. It is important because it saves time and costs. The costs are higher once you deploy the solution. It provides visibility before the deployment. We use CloudGuard CNAPP's CloudGuard CDR capabilities. It is their intelligence security threat system. It is very helpful for any kind of incident management and resolution. We can analyze the logs and try to provide the best possible solution. CloudGuard CDR's intrusion detection and threat-hunting capabilities work fine. CloudGuard CDR helps to detect anomalous behavior and respond to threats before they become an issue. Anomalous behavior detection is fast, but automation with AI and ML is required.
Use Xshield?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't sure what to expect from the pricing, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was a little less than I thought."
"PingSafe falls within the typical price range for cloud security platforms."
"It's not expensive. The product is in its initial growth stages and appears more competitive compared to others. It comes in different variants, and I believe the enterprise version costs around $55 per user per year. I would rate it a five, somewhere fairly moderate."
"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's pricing is good."
"PingSafe is less expensive than other options."
"Its pricing is constant. It has been constant over the previous year, so I am happy with it. However, price distribution can be better explained. That is the only area I am worried about. Otherwise, the pricing is very reasonable."
"The features included in PingSafe justify its price point."
"It's a fair price for what you get. We are happy with the price as it stands."
"It is a very straightforward licensing model that is based on the number of assets you are discovering and managing with the solution."
"The price is on the higher end."
"From a pricing perspective, they are pretty expensive."
"The pricing is extremely competitive."
"The licensing part still needs some work. The issue that I have is that we do not use all the services in the cloud, but sometimes, CloudGuard identifies them as an asset."
"Everything in this field is very expensive."
"Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is always known as a good solution but an expensive one. When you're using Cisco, Check Point, or Palo Alto, you know that you will pay more, but you know that it will work."
"I would advise taking into account the existing number of devices and add a forecast of the number of devices to be added in the coming year or two, to obtain better pricing."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Security Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
The price depends on the extension of the solution that you want to buy. If you want to buy just EDR, the price is le...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
All EDRs are made of different modules. There is a firewall module, an IPS module, and an application module. The app...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, Dome9, Check Point CloudGuard Workload Protection, Check Point CloudGuard Intelligence
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Symantec, Citrix, Car and Driver, Virgin, Cloud Technology Partners
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.