We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and ESET Cloud Apps Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The feature that I find most valuable is the blocking feature."
"We really liked its ease of implementation against our Microsoft Azure environment."
"It learns from behavior, attacks, management, detections, captures packets, real-time analysis, et cetera. It's generating knowledge from a variety of sources for an excellent analysis."
"The reporting against compliance is an important feature that helps you comply with policies and standards within your organization."
"The most valuable feature is the CloudBots for auto-remediation of security findings."
"It presents a real-time database that is always updated."
"The audit feature is the most valuable for compliance reasons. It gives you a full view of the whole environment, no matter how many accounts you have in AWS or Azure. You have it all under one umbrella."
"It is able to bring visibility into that cloudy space where the security departments do not really see what is happening on the DevOps side. It brings visibility, security control, and standardization."
"The most valuable features are the precision of detection and the level of customization of the policy."
"We are close to having 99% or 98% detection."
"In Dome9, there should be a policy validation option where we can validate the policy before we push it into production."
"Currently, I would like this solution extended to cellular devices or tablets."
"Check Point must provide a multi-cloud facility where AWS, Azure, and GCP can seamlessly work together and display posture in an integrated manner."
"Especially with cloud security, there's too much clutter on the screen and too many things going on."
"Streamlining the user interface would greatly improve the user experience."
"I would like an interface more adapted to cell phones or tablets."
"It should have some options to activate API calls to the platform in the cloud, another improvement would be that when the rules are colonized and they want to be published."
"I am not a technical person, but generically, the user interface can be a little more intuitive. Our staff has trained network security and cloud security professionals, and they get it, but when you are trying to get to the customers to be able to pick it up and maintain it, it can be a bit difficult."
"It's not easy for an admin to check and decide if the email is good or not."
"The specific domain file for Apache needs to be well-defined."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 63 reviews while ESET Cloud Apps Protection is ranked 27th in Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while ESET Cloud Apps Protection is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Cloud Apps Protection writes "Great protection, good privacy, and helpful support". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas ESET Cloud Apps Protection is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP). See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. ESET Cloud Apps Protection report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
