Check Point Application Control vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Zscaler are both solutions in the Application Control category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Zscaler is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 5.5% mindshare in AC, compared to Zscaler’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Check Point Application Con...

Read 41 Check Point Application Control reviews

471 Views
59 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Read 63 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform reviews

137 Views
54 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Check Point Application Con...

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Check Point Application Control and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform compete in the cybersecurity category, focusing on application control and zero trust. Check Point is recognized for its threat protection and extensive application database, which gives it an edge in on-premise and hybrid environments. In contrast, Zscaler excels in cloud-based environments with its scalable security solutions.

Features: Check Point Application Control offers a comprehensive and constantly updated database of over 8,000 applications, allowing granular filtering based on risk levels. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems, providing enhanced management of application usage and security policies. Its ability to offer detailed insights and visibility through log entries adds considerable value. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform provides strong cloud-based features including seamless VPN connectivity, robust data protection, and comprehensive integration with multiple IDPs. It stands out for its user-friendliness and efficient cloud-based performance.

Room for Improvement: Check Point Application Control needs to improve in pricing strategies, user-defined application support, and HTTPS decryption. Users highlight a need for more intuitive guides and better support responsiveness. Zscaler Zero Trust requires improvements in speed and bandwidth management in multi-tenant environments. More granularity in SSL inspection and lower latency are desired, along with enhancements in support services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Application Control is mostly deployed in on-premises settings, offering professional support albeit with occasional delays. Its structured support system provides tailored assistance. Zscaler, predominantly used in hybrid and public cloud environments, is praised for its ease of deployment but faces latency issues. Its customer support, though needing quicker response times, benefits businesses aiming for agility and cloud integration.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Application Control is priced on the higher end, reflecting its robust features suited for on-premise setups, but yields high ROI through enhanced security and operational efficiencies. Its licensing model can deter some users due to the cost of additional features. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform also faces pricing concerns, especially with gateway pricing, yet its per-user cost model can attract large enterprises seeking scalable security solutions. Both platforms offer significant ROI by improving security postures and productivity, with Zscaler's cloud-centric model justifying its costs for businesses focusing on scale.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Application Con...

Ranking in Application Control

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Ranking in Application Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (2nd), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (5th), ZTNA as a Service (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (12th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (10th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Control category, the mindshare of Check Point Application Control is 5.5%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is 8.7%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Control

Featured Reviews

Jivesh Sharma

Technical Support Executive at Softcell Technologies Limited

Control application access and optimize bandwidth for enhanced productivity

Check Point Application Control can be improved, particularly in policy management. When we add applications in the policy, we currently have the option to select individual applications, but a feature allowing categorization of applications based on types, such as social media applications, would make it easier to add multiple or bulk applications in the policy. This feature would be very valuable if introduced. Feedback from management about how these changes improved productivity and network performance has been positive. Users were spending their time watching videos on YouTube or streaming content, wasting time on Instagram and Facebook while in the office. Managers complained about this, leading to compliance policies being defined to restrict access to these kinds of applications.

Read full review

Sumit Bhanwala

architect at Tata Consultancy

Cloud-based platform simplifies device and data center management

I find it to be good. The solution is cloud-based with the latest inspection engines, which I find to be amazing. We are less dependent on data centers and device management, which reduces our efforts significantly. It improves our device management, data center management, and updating devices. We need fewer engineers for this management, and it reduces time and efforts for data center management, device upgrades, and IT support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The overall security of the environment has been greatly improved by the Check Point NGFWs. Before implementing the Check Point solutions, we relied on the Cisco ACLs and Zone-Based firewalls configured on the switches and routers, which in fact a simple stateful firewall, and currently appear to be not an efficient solution for protecting from the advanced threats."

"The most important characteristic is granularity, which allows our teams to have different security profiles depending on the department to be protected."

"We love Check Point Application Control for its granular control and to be able to apply policies between groups, hosts, and networks depending on the need."

"They have an excellent support team. They are fast and it is easy to escalate any situation."

"Its implementation is simple."

"It has many important features that have greatly helped the company and the IT department."

"We can easily switch from a classical firewall to a next-gen firewall using application security."

"Check Point Application Control offers a wide selection of applications, and even within those, you can configure uploads, downloads, et cetera, on a very granular level."

More Check Point Application Control pros

"As a cloud-based service, it is very easily implemented."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to establish connectivity for remote users and remote endpoints. It offers a high level of granularity compared to typical VPNs, which also encapsulate a lot of I/O."

"I like the web filtering capabilities."

"The most valuable features of Zscaler SASE include web filtering, application control, and the private access configuration."

"The most valuable features of Zscaler CASB are API integration and DLP."

"The scalability is pretty good."

"Users get direct secure access to applications over the internet."

"I find all Zscaler Private Access features valuable because each replaces flawed technologies, such as EPAs being replacements for VPN and PR as a replacement for PAM, so I can't mention only one valuable feature. Overall, Zscaler Private Access is a good solution."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"The learning curve for new users is challenging since the integrated data models are complicated."

"More and more product specifications should be infused with new incumbent features in the market to stay relevant and concurrent with the organization's needs."

"Seeing the capabilities and features that we are using today, we can say that we could expect an additional feature that could allow us to integrate this management and even security with APIs."

"SD-WAN functionality can be added."

"Improving the scalability and performance to handle larger networks and increasing traffic volumes would ensure consistent reliability under heavy usage conditions."

"At this time, Check Point Application control is the best on the market."

"The initial setup was a bit difficult."

"I think that the pricing for the Check Point products should be reconsidered - we found it to be quite expensive to purchase and to maintain (the licenses and the support services need to be prolonged regularly), or create some additional bundles of the software blades with significant discounts in addition to the current Next Generation Threat Prevention & SandBlast (NGTX) and Next Generation Threat Prevention (NGTP) offers."

More Check Point Application Control cons

"The pricing for Private Access seems to be on the expensive side, and I believe they should consider making it more competitive with other solutions."

"There aren't really any missing features that I have witnessed."

"The only issue with Zscaler Cloud DLP is that it only gives you DLP protection from web traffic, which is flowing out, while a full-blown DLP solution such as Forcepoint or Symantec gives you DLP coverage for multiple channels. Zscaler Cloud DLP doesn't give you coverage for email, fax, and USB channels, and this is the only challenge or room for improvement in the solution. It's just an extension on top of what you're buying on the proxy, so it's just an added layer, and it doesn't cover DLP on a very broad level. I'm unsure if Zcaler is in the business of competing with a full-blown DLP solution, and if there's a plan to expand the features of Zscaler Cloud DLP beyond the web channel because you'll have to deploy a full-blown agent for it. I'm unsure if this is on the cards because the solution is just an added layer that you get with your proxy. I've asked the Zcaler team whether there's a plan to go full DLP in the future, but I didn't get a positive response. There isn't any feature I'd like added to Zscaler Cloud DLP currently, because anything you could think of that should be in cloud or SaaS solutions is already there, except for machine learning, as it's the only functionality that seems to be lacking in the solution. Machine learning is an additional policy available in other DLP solutions in the market, but my team didn't find it in Zscaler Cloud DLP."

"The menu for the ZIA portal could be organized a little bit differently. The most-used modules should be at the top of the menus, not somewhere near the bottom, some of them are not organized well in my opinion."

"The interface needs a bit of work."

"We'd like to have two-factor authentication that is quite simple."

"There are some performance issues with the solution once the module addition begins"

"Another area of improvement is implementation through non-client connectors. The solution can be implemented in two ways. One uses the back file; the other one uses client connectors. So the client connector is pretty fast, but when it comes to non-client connectors and procedures, it's kind of delayed and slow."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Check Point Application Control is expensive. The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The price of Check Point Application Control is high. The support and ecosystem around the solution are expensive."

"The blade has its cost but you can take advantage of the license package to pay less for it."

"It's a bit expensive and it could be cheaper, but it's part of business politics."

"I think application control has become a basic feature and it should be enabled automatically, without having to purchase a separate license for it."

"The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price."

"The price is competitive."

"Zscaler SASE software is quite expensive compared to other solutions"

"My company is a Zscaler Private Access partner, so the customers pay for the license fees."

"The product is a little more expensive than other tools."

"The solution has increased prices this year."

"The licensing model for Zscaler Cloud DLP allows you to only buy what you need. You don't need to buy it as a whole, so it's good."

"The product is a bit expensive."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Application Control?

It has many important features that have greatly helped the company and the IT department.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Application Control?

The experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Check Point Application Control was straightforward.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Application Control?

Check Point Application Control ( /products/check-point-application-control-reviews ) can be improved by offering more granular levels of control. For example, in WhatsApp, there should be deep-lev...

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler SASE?

Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the features, so my advice for organizations would be to evaluate their specific n...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Carbon Black App Control vs Check Point Application Control

Compared 100% of the time

More Check Point Application Control Competitors

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 7% of the time

FortiSASE vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Netskope Private Access vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Application Control

June 2025

Download Check Point Application Control product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

May 2025

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Overview

Check Point Application Control provides the industry’s strongest application security and identity control to organizations of all sizes. It enables IT teams to easily create granular policies, based on users or groups, to identify, block or limit usage of thousands of Web applications and widgets.

Learn more about Application control software

Check Point Software Technologies

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform acts as a VPN alternative for secure remote access, cloud protection, and zero-trust strategies. It enables secure data transmission, supports remote work, and enhances compliance through a cloud-based architecture, offering improved performance and simplified management.

Designed for organizations seeking secure application access and robust data protection, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform delivers a comprehensive solution through seamless VPN connectivity, data loss prevention, and SSL inspection. Its cloud integration ensures scalability and reliability, while its interface provides intuitive management. Companies benefit from automatic secure access, minimizing constant authentication needs, and safeguarding sensitive data. The platform allows easy deployment and integration with diverse identity providers, granting granular control for access and application segmentation. Despite powerful capabilities, enhancements are needed in speed, bandwidth, and legacy support, with users noting interface and configuration challenges.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform?

Seamless VPN Connectivity: Provides automatic secure access without repetitive authentication.
Strong Security Measures: Offers DLP and SSL inspection for data protection.
Cloud Integration: Ensures scalability and performance optimization.
Granular Access Control: Manages access with application-specific segmentation.

What benefits should companies look for in reviews when evaluating this platform?

Performance: Enhanced connectivity and reduced latency.
Data Protection: Comprehensive DLP and encryption capabilities.
Scalability: Efficient handling of growing organizational demands.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup and integration with IDPs.

In specific industries, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange has been implemented to enhance security protocols in fields like finance and healthcare. By prioritizing data protection and compliance, it assists companies in safely managing sensitive information and meeting regulatory requirements. Organizations leverage its features to ensure secure operations across remote and cloud environments, adapting to industry-specific needs with customizable access and security controls.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

SEB, Luma Arles, Terma, Aerospace, Midwest Rubber

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

June 2025

Free Report: Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report.

See our list of best Application Control vendors.

We monitor all Application Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.