Check Point Application Control vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Zscaler are both solutions in the Application Control category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while Zscaler is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 5.9% mindshare in AC, compared to Zscaler’s 8.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Check Point Application Con...

Read 41 Check Point Application Control reviews

468 Views
468 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Read 64 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform reviews

13,359 Views
134 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Check Point Application Con...

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Check Point Application Control and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform compete in the network security sector. Zscaler seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless cloud integration and wide-reaching security features.

Features: Check Point Application Control offers comprehensive threat protection via an extensive application database, allowing granular control over applications and sub-applications. Its detailed security policies enhance network efficiency and compliance. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is praised for seamless cloud integration, a user-friendly interface, and robust security features like secure private access and strong DLP capabilities, making it an integrated solution for secure distributed environments.

Room for Improvement: Check Point users highlight the need for more flexible pricing, better policy validation features, faster support response, and efficient handling of encrypted traffic. Zscaler users suggest interface usability enhancements, stronger legacy system support, and reduced latency as areas for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point typically operates in on-premises environments and receives mixed support reviews, with some users citing slow resolution times. Zscaler, often cloud-deployed, benefits from easy scalability but faces criticism for support responsiveness, providing detailed support services differing in deployment environments.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point is deemed expensive, with users advocating for more competitive licensing to match its advanced features. It offers a significant ROI through network performance and compliance. Zscaler is also seen as costly, needing pricing adjustments for multi-tenant environments but delivers notable ROI by enhancing security and productivity.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Application Con...

Ranking in Application Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Ranking in Application Control

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (2nd), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (5th), ZTNA as a Service (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (12th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (10th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Control category, the mindshare of Check Point Application Control is 5.9%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is 8.4%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Control

Featured Reviews

Jivesh Sharma

Technical Support Executive at Softcell Technologies Limited

Control application access and optimize bandwidth for enhanced productivity

Check Point Application Control can be improved, particularly in policy management. When we add applications in the policy, we currently have the option to select individual applications, but a feature allowing categorization of applications based on types, such as social media applications, would make it easier to add multiple or bulk applications in the policy. This feature would be very valuable if introduced. Feedback from management about how these changes improved productivity and network performance has been positive. Users were spending their time watching videos on YouTube or streaming content, wasting time on Instagram and Facebook while in the office. Managers complained about this, leading to compliance policies being defined to restrict access to these kinds of applications.

Read full review

Sumit Bhanwala

architect at Tata Consultancy

Cloud-based platform simplifies device and data center management

I find it to be good. The solution is cloud-based with the latest inspection engines, which I find to be amazing. We are less dependent on data centers and device management, which reduces our efforts significantly. It improves our device management, data center management, and updating devices. We need fewer engineers for this management, and it reduces time and efforts for data center management, device upgrades, and IT support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has many important features that have greatly helped the company and the IT department."

"Check Point Application Control offers a wide selection of applications, and even within those, you can configure uploads, downloads, et cetera, on a very granular level."

"This solution is stable and we have not had any issues."

"The most outstanding feature is the Check Point APK wiki."

"They have an excellent support team. They are fast and it is easy to escalate any situation."

"This product logs & monitors event traffic for each application, giving us better visibility."

"Check Point enables us to save internet bandwidth. The administration offers good guidance. We don't want the employees to access social networking on work computers because it will distract them from their jobs, so we can block that. It also helps us to implement changes very quickly and to get people to be more focused on the job."

"Among the features that we have used, we like being able to identify the identity of the user who is doing transactions."

More Check Point Application Control pros

"On DLP terms, Zscaler Cloud DLP ensures that data doesn't go outside of the organization. So on the network level, Zscaler does a pretty good job."

"I like its ease of use. It has a single pane of glass for the ZIA and ZPA pieces. It is very manageable. It is also very easy to deploy for secure access, and it gives half-decent coverage for visibility in terms of what the users use and what data is being proxied through the access gateway."

"The UI is easy to use."

"The policies are very easy to implement."

"The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability."

"The most valuable feature of Zscaler Private Access is the categorization of the dynamic URLs which keeps the customer's environment protected. The threats and the malware are correctly categorized."

"Sandboxing, DLP, and SSL inspection engine are the most valuable features of Zscaler SASE."

"The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are its ability to integrate with multiple IDPs and application segmentation."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"SD-WAN functionality can be added."

"We would like the product to be a bit more user-friendly in general."

"Something important to mention is the improvement at the support level. It could be more advanced."

"It would be nice if there was a platform and small application owners could come and send their own applications' name and IP information from there."

"It is expensive."

"I think that the pricing for the Check Point products should be reconsidered - we found it to be quite expensive to purchase and to maintain (the licenses and the support services need to be prolonged regularly), or create some additional bundles of the software blades with significant discounts in addition to the current Next Generation Threat Prevention & SandBlast (NGTX) and Next Generation Threat Prevention (NGTP) offers."

"Check Point is a fairly complete security vendor, however we would like to have a better SLA for technical support issues."

"The one feature that could be improved would be the ability to see implicit rules that are defaulted on the policy."

More Check Point Application Control cons

"Conflicts arise if you do not have the same management teams on the product."

"Having a Zscaler-specific device could streamline this process and provide a more consistent user experience across diverse branches."

"Occasionally, issues arise in the LogStack by a third party, particularly for government websites accessed by numerous users."

"To enhance their offering, it is advisable for them to focus on strengthening the foundation of their architecture. Additionally, they should consider integrating a broader range of services that go beyond what managed service providers typically offer independently."

"User management can be improved."

"The area that requires improvement is their support. The current support is lacking."

"There are latency issues with the solution. They are small, however, they are there when you compare it to other vendors."

"On the improvement side, when we bypass certain internet traffic types, it's currently recommended to have a one-click option, but audio and video aren't always supported. Thus, we need to bypass that kind of traffic. So, it is an area of improvement."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Check Point Application Control is high. The support and ecosystem around the solution are expensive."

"Check Point Application Control is expensive. The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The blade has its cost but you can take advantage of the license package to pay less for it."

"I think application control has become a basic feature and it should be enabled automatically, without having to purchase a separate license for it."

"It's a bit expensive and it could be cheaper, but it's part of business politics."

"The pricing is quite high, especially when it comes to the gateway."

"It is an auto-renewal subscription service."

"Zscaler Cloud DLP is moderately priced. We pay around 2 million rupees per year."

"In terms of market positioning, I would describe Zscaler Private Access as offering optimal pricing. Based on our experience, Cato Networks tends to be slightly more expensive."

"In the long run, cloud services are not inherently costly."

"The product is a bit expensive."

"The solution has increased prices this year."

"There is definitely an ROI."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Performing Arts

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Application Control?

It has many important features that have greatly helped the company and the IT department.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Application Control?

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Application Control is that the pricing is a bit high, but the features provided justify the cost. The features that Check ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Application Control?

Check Point Application Control could be improved, particularly regarding the application categorization accuracy as we often face miscategorization issues. The database should be updated properly ...

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler SASE?

Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the features, so my advice for organizations would be to evaluate their specific n...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Carbon Black App Control vs Check Point Application Control

Compared 100% of the time

More Check Point Application Control Competitors

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 7% of the time

FortiSASE vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Netskope Private Access vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Application Control

August 2025

Download Check Point Application Control product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

July 2025

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Overview

Check Point Application Control provides the industry’s strongest application security and identity control to organizations of all sizes. It enables IT teams to easily create granular policies, based on users or groups, to identify, block or limit usage of thousands of Web applications and widgets.

Learn more about Application control software

Check Point Software Technologies

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform acts as a VPN alternative for secure remote access, cloud protection, and zero-trust strategies. It enables secure data transmission, supports remote work, and enhances compliance through a cloud-based architecture, offering improved performance and simplified management.

Designed for organizations seeking secure application access and robust data protection, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform delivers a comprehensive solution through seamless VPN connectivity, data loss prevention, and SSL inspection. Its cloud integration ensures scalability and reliability, while its interface provides intuitive management. Companies benefit from automatic secure access, minimizing constant authentication needs, and safeguarding sensitive data. The platform allows easy deployment and integration with diverse identity providers, granting granular control for access and application segmentation. Despite powerful capabilities, enhancements are needed in speed, bandwidth, and legacy support, with users noting interface and configuration challenges.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform?

Seamless VPN Connectivity: Provides automatic secure access without repetitive authentication.
Strong Security Measures: Offers DLP and SSL inspection for data protection.
Cloud Integration: Ensures scalability and performance optimization.
Granular Access Control: Manages access with application-specific segmentation.

What benefits should companies look for in reviews when evaluating this platform?

Performance: Enhanced connectivity and reduced latency.
Data Protection: Comprehensive DLP and encryption capabilities.
Scalability: Efficient handling of growing organizational demands.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup and integration with IDPs.

In specific industries, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange has been implemented to enhance security protocols in fields like finance and healthcare. By prioritizing data protection and compliance, it assists companies in safely managing sensitive information and meeting regulatory requirements. Organizations leverage its features to ensure secure operations across remote and cloud environments, adapting to industry-specific needs with customizable access and security controls.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

SEB, Luma Arles, Terma, Aerospace, Midwest Rubber

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report.

See our list of best Application Control vendors.

We monitor all Application Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.