Centreon vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.0. Centreon holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,361 Views
7,395 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Network Operations...

Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews

2,244 Views
1,683 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Centreon

OpenText Network Operations...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and OpenText Network Operations Management compete in network monitoring and management. The superior product is OpenText Network Operations Management due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Centreon provides robust monitoring with flexibility and scalability suitable for varied IT environments. OpenText Network Operations Management offers powerful integrations and advanced automation, allowing efficient network management. Centreon focuses on customization. OpenText delivers extensive automation and integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon's simple deployment and responsive customer service are ideal for organizations with limited IT resources. OpenText Network Operations Management requires more substantial initial setup but provides comprehensive support for enterprises seeking detailed network control.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is notable for its competitive setup cost and significant ROI due to low entry barriers and adaptability. OpenText Network Operations Management involves a higher initial investment but promises long-term value through its advanced features, appealing to large enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

OpenText Network Operations...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

59th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.2%
OpenText Network Operations Management	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

AhmedBahgat

Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable

The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like most about Centreon is that it is very flexible and customizable, based on the user and/or business needs. Centreon is very flexible when it comes to monitoring parameters. We can use scripts found on the internet or scripts created by our infra/apps team. Also, the data visualization features are very simple and straightforward, yet very informative."

"I can't point to one valuable feature. All of Centreon is good."

"Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively."

"We have all our tickets inside Centreon in real-time and can monitor a lot of ELP and CLN in real-time for application purposes."

"It supports active monitoring so we don't have to use traps. From time to time traps are not very useful because we never know if they are actually working or not. The reporting part is also valuable as are the event logs. Using them we can check right away if something has had a hiccup."

"Centreon's most valuable feature is Opsgenie."

"What I like most about Centreon is that it is very flexible and customizable, based on the user and/or business needs."

"Once everything is set up correctly, it reduces our MTTR by 50 percent."

More Centreon pros

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."

"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."

Cons

"There are times when we face issues with Centreon being in development mode. Sometimes we do not receive alerts, causing business impact, and users ask why no alerts were received."

"Where Centreon is weaker is that the initial deployment could be easier."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems. It already exists for some of them. For example, the Stream Connector is something we use to populate data in another system. This kind of facility for connecting should exist for all products that it makes sense to have connected to a monitoring solution."

"Now that we got it, I haven't had time to work on it since it is a paid solution that is quite expensive."

"The scalability of Centreon is very bad because of the nature of the software."

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"Centreon supports officially 10,000 services per poller. That is not much for larger customers, because this limit is reached very quickly. We use it with three times the limit without any problems, but Centreon says, "Okay, we are only supporting it with 10,000 services." We are aware that increasing the limit has different impacts because they need to support it. However, for most customers, it would be be very good if they could increase the limit of services."

"The problem with the reporting is you have to configure the report, and after that, you will have the same report every month, every week, every day. You have to sync it in order to have a great report."

More Centreon cons

"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure."

"It may need a more customizable UI."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"Open-source solutions like this can be very cost effective for an organization looking for a product that they can quickly implement, as there is no initial cost and there are no license renewal fees. However, it is important to take into consideration some of the related costs that may come along as needed, such as training, support, and product enhancements."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"The pricing starts at around 5000 euro. However, this depends on: Your environment, the size of your host, how many hosts you have, how many remote pollers you have, and if you want to use the Monitoring Business Intelligence or Centreon MAP functionalities."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

23%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The price is reasonable based on the agreement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

FireMon Asset Manager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

October 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

September 2026

OpenText Network Operations Management report

Download OpenText Network Operations Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Network Operations Management

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

OpenText Network Operations Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed for efficient network operations and management. It helps organizations streamline their network processes, ensuring enhanced performance and reliability in complex IT environments.

The platform is robust, providing capabilities that align with industry needs for automation and integration. Its powerful analytics and monitoring features enable IT teams to effectively manage network performance, detect anomalies, and ensure uptime. OpenText Network Operations Management supports scalable IT infrastructures, ensuring reliable operations in both cloud and on-premises settings.

What are the key features of OpenText Network Operations Management?

Scalable Monitoring: Provides continuous visibility into network performance across all environments.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks through automated workflows and alerts.
Incident Management: Enables rapid detection and resolution of network issues.
Analytics: Offers insights through advanced analytics tools to optimize operations.

What benefits or ROI can be expected from OpenText Network Operations Management?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlined processes and automation lead to higher productivity.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and reduces maintenance costs.
Improved Reliability: Enhances network uptime and performance.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.

OpenText Network Operations Management is utilized in sectors like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where reliable network performance is crucial. It supports critical operations by ensuring seamless integration and effective management of network resources in these industries.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

September 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.