We performed a comparison between Centerity Monitor and NetCrunch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The machine learning feature is valuable."
"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."
"They can improve the functionality that provides some numbers related to the behavior of the metrics."
"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."
Centerity Monitor is ranked 68th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while NetCrunch is ranked 67th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Centerity Monitor is rated 7.0, while NetCrunch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Centerity Monitor writes "A user-friendly solution that comes with a valuable machine learning feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". Centerity Monitor is most compared with , whereas NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
