CDN77 vs Kemp LoadMaster comparison

CDN77.com and Progress Software are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. CDN77.com is ranked #29, while Progress Software is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. CDN77.com holds a 1.1% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Progress Software’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CDN77.com users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

CDN77

Read 3 CDN77 reviews

417 Views
334 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kemp LoadMaster

Read 50 Kemp LoadMaster reviews

2,756 Views
606 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

CDN77

Kemp LoadMaster

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CDN77 and Kemp LoadMaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CDN77 vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CDN77 vs. Kemp LoadMaster

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CDN77

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

29th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (17th)

Kemp LoadMaster

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

18th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (9th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of CDN77 is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster is 1.4%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kemp LoadMaster	1.4%
CDN77	1.1%
Other	97.5%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

it_user854160

Broadspectrum

Provides quick access to resources

We are a radio station who serves up music It has improved our organization by providing quick access to resources. CDN Speed Data center availability around the world This product satisfies our company needs. No additional features are required as far as we are concerned. More than five…

Read full review

IshtiaqKhalil

Information Security Engineer at BOK

Displays flexible, user-friendly interface with minor licensing challenges

The product could be improved with a more intuitive interface for complex configurations and more advanced analytics. Additionally, enhanced security features, like a more robust Web Application Firewall, and stronger APIs for better automation would be beneficial. Overall, the main areas for improvement are in strengthening the advanced features to better meet the demands of large-scale enterprise environments. key features for the next release should focus on three areas. First, an enhanced, next-generation security suite with a more powerful Web Application Firewall (WAF) and integrated bot protection. Second, more advanced and customizable analytics dashboards to provide deeper insights into application performance. Finally, greater support for modern, cloud-native environments, including better APIs for automation and seamless hybrid-cloud traffic management

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has helped improve load speed on the site."

"The control panel is nicely laid out and I do not have to hunt for functionality."

"Purge pages: It is a fast solution for updating my content from all datacenters."

"I selected CDN77 because it has servers where our different target markets are (some are in Asia)."

"It has improved our organization by providing quick access to resources."

"It is extremely easy to set up and integrate with WordPress and purge files as needed through the control panel."

"The solution is easy to configure when changing the load balancing method to Round Robin or least connection."

"Exchange load balancing and reverse proxy for Skype for Business are key features."

"There is a simplicity to the setup and configuration."

"The most valuable feature that I found is the load balancing feature, it is the core function of the product."

"Persistence is very valuable. This holds the connection information of the source and that connection is important to RDP and our APO calls. The connection has to be persisted to the original source to operate properly. We also use the subsections for sub-services to create services inside our services for our API resources, this is most awesome. We would not be able to do this without Kemp and offer this type of sub-service to route based on an API instance. It routes the traffic properly based on the sub-service type."

"We are most impressed with the ease of use and great support."

"When the templates are used, there is not much left to configure and they just work!"

"The security features are the most valuable features of this solution."

More Kemp LoadMaster pros

Cons

"If you are a low-use user and not used the minimum credit, it will be lost at end of year unless you upgrade, then you are left with more bandwidth than you can ever use."

"A year ago, I had to deal with SEO factors involving duplication of content."

"If I had to change something it would maybe be to have a little better reporting graphics that show more details in the reporting. It seems to be a little small in the graphic, and I'm not sure if possible but maybe a GUI page that one can use to monitor if any server goes down."

"To make it a perfect ten out of ten it would need better connection logging. If there is an active connection, that there is better logging. It should also have better management monitoring tools."

"I really don't like the way the logs are presented in the software."

"I would like to see more automation and control of overactive and inactive resources. If I could schedule these around our updates then it would be all automated. I would like to set up an automated script to coincide with the scripts I use to update resources and servers."

"In the next release, Kemp should include the ability for LoadMaster to create different DNS record types."

"Over the last several major versions, the GUI has remained virtually unchanged and still seems lacking."

"They need to improve the UI environment. Currently, it's hard to navigate and use product."

"I want to have the ability to pull a particular server. The DevOps portion was challenging for me, like if I needed to redirect from one IP to another URL. I needed to look that up, and the knowledge base is not well organized. When I look for information about Kemp on the Internet, I don't find many articles or something like that."

More Kemp LoadMaster cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For low-use users, it can be more expensive than it seems. It would be a disadvantage for a lot of hobby users."

"I would suggest low usage cases that there are other options available, such as WordPress's own CDN."

"Regarding the pricing, it is expensive. It may not suit others. I suggest a lower recharge level and also to remove the credit expiry time."

"The setup cost and pricing plan is reasonable and will ultimately give you a worthy return."

"Less expensive than Citrix."

"Setup is easy, the cost is affordable, and the licensing is quick and simple."

"Any decent product will cost money and if you want great support and a great product, then you will want to spend the money on it."

"Currently, no cost is involved with a virtual load balancer. They have used open source. We did not pay for software. We paid for the expertise. We are only paying the consulting charges, which are very reasonable, that is, around a thousand dollars."

"The license varies according to the number of megabits."

"The Kemp LoadMaster is a tremendous value."

"It is well-priced and licensing is very flexible."

More Kemp LoadMaster pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kemp LoadMaster?

My primary advice is to carefully analyze your total cost of ownership (TCO) rather than just the initial purchase price. Kemp LoadMaster is highly competitive on price and often provides a much be...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kemp LoadMaster?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kemp LoadMaster?

Our primary use case was traffic load balancing and distribution. The solution was essential for managing all inbound client traffic, including HTTPS and DNS requests, by routing it through our fir...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs CDN77

Compared 31% of the time

Fastly vs CDN77

Compared 24% of the time

Uplynk vs CDN77

Compared 17% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs CDN77

Compared 11% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs CDN77

Compared 9% of the time

More CDN77 Competitors

HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 16% of the time

NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 10% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 9% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 9% of the time

More Kemp LoadMaster Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CDN

January 2026

Download CDN77 product report

Buyer's Guide

Kemp LoadMaster

January 2026

Download Kemp LoadMaster product report

Also Known As

No data available

LoadMaster Load Balancer

Overview

CDN77 is an innovation leading content delivery network provider with global coverage of 32+ PoPs on 5 continents.

CDN77 is a great solution for many use cases - website acceleration and security, live streaming, VOD, gaming, software distribution and private CDN.

Get a 14-day free trial with unlimited features and 24/7 live support. No credit card needed. Make your content delivery faster and more secure within 5 minutes.

CDN77.com

Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features.

Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Hubble Space Telescope & European Southern Observatory, Oracle, Scania, CentOS, bet-at-home.com, Playrix, Epom Ad Server

Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank

Buyer's Guide

CDN77 vs. Kemp LoadMaster

December 2025

Free Report: CDN77 vs. Kemp LoadMaster

Find out what your peers are saying about CDN77 vs. Kemp LoadMaster and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CDN77 vs. Kemp LoadMaster report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.