Casepoint vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Casepoint and Microsoft are both solutions in the eDiscovery category. Casepoint is ranked #15, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Casepoint holds a 2.0% mindshare in eD, compared to Microsoft’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Casepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Casepoint

Read 2 Casepoint reviews

813 Views
813 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Read 8 Microsoft Purview eDiscovery reviews

3,627 Views
2,285 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Casepoint

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Casepoint and Microsoft Purview eDiscovery are prominent solutions in the eDiscovery market. Casepoint has advantages in support and cost-effectiveness, while Microsoft Purview eDiscovery offers robust features beneficial despite higher pricing.

Features: Casepoint is recognized for intuitive tools, enabling effective document management and streamlined workflows. Its user-centric design is appreciated by users. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is commended for comprehensive integration with Office 365, AI-driven search capabilities, and broader feature set, making it suitable for users heavily invested in Microsoft platforms.

Room for Improvement: Casepoint users express the need for enhanced analytic tools, more frequent updates, and additional customization options. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery users suggest improvements in onboarding support, increased customization options, and more responsive customer support service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment is reported to be smooth for Casepoint, with users appreciating attentive customer service. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery benefits from seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems, though challenges with initial setup and support responsiveness are noted by some users.

Pricing and ROI: Casepoint is viewed as cost-effective with quicker ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is more expensive but justified by its extensive feature set and integrations, providing value over time for organizations investing in Microsoft platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Casepoint vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Casepoint vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Casepoint

Ranking in eDiscovery

15th

Average Rating

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Ranking in eDiscovery

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of Casepoint is 2.0%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is 4.2%, down from 18.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

eDiscovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery	4.2%
Casepoint	2.0%
Other	93.8%

eDiscovery

Featured Reviews

reviewer1604448

Partner at a legal firm with 11-50 employees

Overpriced for storing documents, it is not user-friendly, and the support is paid hourly

I hate everything about it this product. It is not user-friendly. There is maybe one person in our office who has any proficiency with it. I don't like it at all. For litigation, what I wanted was a one-stop shop. Once the document is produced as an exhibit for example, then I want to be able to annotate on that document and use that during my trial versus using Casepoint for the production. However, I now have to somehow download that production into several PDFs. I can't use the sort feature or other features. I would prefer to leave it on Casepoint because now I have tagged it for witnesses, which is helpful in litigation, but the notes features on Casepoint is a tiny box in the bottom right of the document and that is not really helpful to me because of the way that I use documents in the trial is, for example, if you are going to be my witness, I draft a direct examination of you. When I get to the point in my direct examination where I want to cover an exhibit that I'm trying to admit with you, I hyperlink that. The document that I have hyperlinked has my questions and notes on the document, that I'm going to ask you about, but I can't do that in Casepoint.

Read full review

Frank Radeck

Director, IT Infrastructure & Cloud Technology at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees

Tasks that took an entire day before we implemented the solution now take just 30 minutes.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is its ability to search across various platforms, including Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive. It enables a streamlined, unified process for searching across these platforms. It is critical for Purview to be able to connect to iOS, Mac, and Android devices and data in other SaaS apps. From a support perspective, I can do things while I'm eating lunch or something else. It's more dynamic and responsive. I think everybody appreciates it. We're not tied to one device. Purview's multi-cloud capabilities are also essential for the same reasons. Keeping everything under one umbrella further increases the time savings. Purview accounts for critical regulations from around the world. This is crucial because we hold ourselves accountable to standards and need to align with them. Working at a law firm, we have clients who dictate to us what standards they expect. The visibility is excellent. As we move more things into the cloud, more opportunities exist to put everything under one umbrella.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was quite straightforward. It's really just a matter of plug-and-play."

"Casepoint is very stable."

"Casepoint is scalable, and I don't have any issues with the scalability of this solution; it manages what we need as far as size."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the content search. We can use it to find the data we need by searching for keywords, phrases, or the sender or recipient. It helps us gather information from current employees or ones who have left the company."

"The tool has been beneficial. Some of our previous users left the organization without sharing the information they had at a personal level. This information was related to the organization, and they didn't disclose it. Thanks to the product, it's easy for me to search and find out what communication a specific user has done, whether it's from SharePoint or any other platform. With Microsoft Purview eDiscovery, we can easily retrieve and restore this data."

"The machine learning wasn't half bad. I really like that part. I thought it was novel. It pretty much automated it, once you trained the model."

"The most valuable features are automatic content logging tagging. Performing these tasks manually would be impossible. Since most of our data is already in Microsoft, it's convenient to run it through this tool."

"The return on investment is saving the equivalent of one or two full-time IT department employees and a few hours per week for legal staff."

"The speed of it is valuable. I am able to search even 10,000 mailboxes for specific content. It helps search and accommodate the often limited information provided by users regarding what they need."

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery has saved me personally a lot of time because I can query it, and it touches everything we have as a full Microsoft shop."

"The ability to query everything that's in Microsoft and send links or add people, like managers, to review the documents is valuable. It's easy as I don't have to download and email anything. I just add them as a reviewer, and they can access it from there."

More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery pros

Cons

"The biggest pain point for me and most people is that when we have to update our passwords, we have to go back in and remap our web folders."

"I hate everything about it this product. It is not user-friendly."

"I would suggest adding more platforms."

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery should be cheaper."

"I see two significant challenges with many of my clients. One is that there are some functionality gaps compared to specialized tools in the legal industry, like a legal hold tool or a document review tool. They have features that Purview eDiscovery lacks. Those gaps create a situation where I almost have to do things twice. I need to collect all my data in eDiscovery and ship it to another platform to complete the review."

"The query language can be time-consuming to figure out if you don't know it initially."

"The sorting and filtering of the result data need improvement, and the interface for writing queries is not user-friendly for business users. We still need all the backend stuff. We have to use Graph API to interface with everything and create custom interfaces on the front end to make it easier for the end users, which is costly. The reporting, sorting, and filtering capabilities that other products have aren't available natively in Purview."

"The query language can be time-consuming to figure out if you don't know it initially. While there are options with dropdowns to select criteria, having a natural language feature would be beneficial. Copilot is expected to add such functionality in the future."

"The sorting and filtering of the result data need improvement, and the interface for writing queries is not user-friendly for business users."

"We find that many critical functions are available only to E5 license holders."

More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's ridiculously overpriced and the bills are ridiculous."

"The costs associated with E5 licensing are currently expensive for us, so we use the E3 license, which comes with fewer features and functionalities."

"In the positions that I've had through contracting over the years, I've heard talk of it being overpriced and underperforming compared to its competitors."

"The pricing and licensing with Microsoft can be complex, and licensing is known to be a challenge because it changes frequently. While the licensing for Purview is not as tricky as other Microsoft products, navigating licenses since the shift to E3 and E5 plans has been a task, as individual licenses must now be purchased separately."

"With the full bundle, pricing is not a significant concern. As an M3, I find the Purview pricing of 1250 per user worthwhile."

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery comes as part of Microsoft 365 licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

The setup process was very straightforward. We acquired pricing through our reseller in NASDAQ, eliminating the need to search for prices ourselves.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

The query language can be time-consuming to figure out if you don't know it initially. While there are options with dropdowns to select criteria, having a natural language feature would be benefici...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

I sometimes use it for legal holds or to find lost items, and to determine what is going on. However, most of the time, my use case is legal-related.

See all answers

Comparisons

Logikcull vs Casepoint

Compared 19% of the time

kCura Relativity vs Casepoint

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs Casepoint

Compared 12% of the time

Relativity vs Casepoint

Compared 10% of the time

Smarsh Enterprise Platform vs Casepoint

Compared 9% of the time

More Casepoint Competitors

Google Vault vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 12% of the time

Relativity vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 6% of the time

Smarsh Enterprise Platform vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

eDiscovery

September 2026

Download Casepoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

September 2026

Download Microsoft Purview eDiscovery product report

Overview

Casepoint is an eDiscovery platform designed to streamline the legal process through advanced technology. Its comprehensive tools offer end-to-end solutions, enhancing efficiency and data management for legal teams.

Targeted at legal professionals, Casepoint provides an integrated platform for managing eDiscovery needs. From data collection to review and production, it incorporates advanced analytics to streamline complex tasks. Built for security and collaboration, Casepoint supports the legal workflow with robust features ensuring case data integrity and accessibility. It also offers flexible deployment options to meet the specific demands of different legal environments.

What are the most important features of Casepoint?

Data Identification: Efficiently identify relevant data across multiple sources.
Document Review: Advanced tools for thorough and efficient document analysis.
Data Analytics: Insightful data visualization aids in understanding complex information.
Secure Collaboration: Facilitates secure team interactions and communications.
Case Management: Comprehensive tools for managing all aspects of eDiscovery projects.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Savings: Streamlines processes to reduce time and expenses in legal operations.
Improved Accuracy: Enhanced data management ensures more accurate outcomes.
Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks to increase staff productivity.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs while maintaining performance.

Casepoint is widely adopted across legal sectors, addressing industry-specific challenges with a focus on compliance and data security. In corporate legal departments, it supports legal holds and internal investigations. Law firms benefit from its streamlined workflow that aids in case preparation and trial management, ensuring that Casepoint meets the rigorous demands of today's legal landscapes effectively.

Casepoint

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery offers rapid search capabilities across multiple Microsoft platforms, supporting compliance with global regulations and improving data management efficiency for organizations.

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery empowers organizations to perform rapid content searches across Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, OneDrive, and mobile devices. It enables keyword-based searches and automates content logging and tagging, ensuring privacy law adherence. This tool is designed to enhance visibility and legal compliance, featuring extensive data protection, native integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, and ensuring efficiency for collecting electronically stored information.

What are the key features of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

Rapid Content Search: Enables efficient keyword-based searches across multiple Microsoft platforms.
Data Connectivity: Ensures seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Compliance Support: Provides features vital for adhering to global privacy regulations.
Automated Content Logging: Streamlines tagging processes to adhere to privacy laws.
Extensive Data Protection: Offers robust protection for sensitive information.

What benefits should users expect from Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

Increased Efficiency: Speeds up data retrieval and legal processing tasks.
Enhanced Compliance: Supports adherence to international regulations.
Improved Data Management: Streamlines the management of electronically stored information.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on manual data searches and tagging.
Cost-effectiveness: Potential to lower overall compliance and data management costs.

Industries like legal services employ Microsoft Purview eDiscovery extensively for handling litigation requests and managing legal holds. This tool facilitates the retrieval and management of historical data, particularly during workforce transformations or information governance challenges, making it crucial for efficient eDiscovery workflows.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

BARNES & THRONBURG LLP, BRIGGS, Morgan Lewis, JENNER&BLOCK, COHENMILSTEIN, WheelerTriggO'Donnell LLP

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Casepoint vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

September 2026

Free Report: Casepoint vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Find out what your peers are saying about Casepoint vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Casepoint vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery report.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.