Carbonite Server vs NovaStor NovaBACKUP comparison

OpenText and NovaStor are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #43 with an average rating of 8.0, while NovaStor is ranked #33 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in BRS, compared to NovaStor’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NovaStor users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

998 Views
543 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Read 3 NovaStor NovaBACKUP reviews

374 Views
161 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

NovaStor NovaBACKUP and Carbonite Server are both prominent solutions in the data protection and backup software space. Based on user feedback and feature sets, Carbonite Server generally seems to have an upper hand due to its comprehensive features and robust reliability.

Features: NovaStor NovaBACKUP offers reliable performance, ease of use, and solid encryption features. Carbonite Server provides comprehensive backup options, seamless cloud integration, and advanced recovery tools.

Room for Improvement: NovaStor NovaBACKUP could benefit from faster backups, more intuitive setup processes, and additional feature enhancements. Carbonite Server may need improved customer support, greater pricing flexibility, and optimizations for smaller business users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NovaStor NovaBACKUP is noted for straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. Carbonite Server requires more complex deployment but offers extensive documentation and community support.

Pricing and ROI: NovaStor NovaBACKUP is seen as cost-effective with satisfactory ROI, especially for small to medium businesses. Carbonite Server, despite its higher price, is considered to provide substantial ROI through its enhanced features and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

43rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (31st)

NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

33rd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NovaStor NovaBACKUP is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Dale Dirkes

President at DIAD Consulting, Inc.

A simple, efficient, reliable product

The efficiency and convenience are excellent. The pricing is very good. It shows you what has been updated via little green dots. The solution is very automatic. I don't have to worry about it. It was easy to set up. Technical support has been helpful in the past. The solution has been problem-free.

Read full review

Rainer Kummerfeldt

IT-Teamleader at Bechtle

Easy to work and offers features for tape backups, disk backups, and whatever you want

NovaStor NovaBACKUP is still working on new features because they listen to the customers and integrate their needs into new versions. You can see they make progress with each new version. They are much faster than IBM, where you sometimes have to wait years for new features. It is very quick and fast. NovaStor have big competitors like Veeam, which is very fast and aggressive. It's good, but it depends on the price. I think NovaStor might be cheaper. They have a direct connection to their developers and sales teams, which makes getting answers very fast. Veeam has a lot of features, like a special reporting tool. However, I've heard from some customers that Veeam wasn't always the right decision because it couldn't work with their environment. But Veeam has aggressive marketing, which is why they are probably in first place at the moment, besides Commvault. IBM has lost its competitive edge and is trying to catch up, but it might be too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is very stable."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

More Carbonite Server pros

"It is a very good and easy-to-use tool for non-technical people."

"It's the easiest way to configure it."

Cons

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The price of NovaStor NovaBACKUP is an area that can be considered as a weakness or drawback, where improvements are required."

"The room for improvement lies in the compatibility of NovaBACKUP with older operating systems."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"Its price is reasonable."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The solution is open source."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the solution's maintenance and support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Carbonite Server?

I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Carbonite Server?

The ability to perform instant recovery would be a game changer. For a large user base, the creation of user accounts at this time is a little cumbersome, there isn't any Single-Sign-On (SSO) integ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Carbonite Server?

I work for a managed services provider, and we supply the solution for various sized customers.

See all answers

What do you like most about NovaStor NovaBACKUP?

It is a very good and easy-to-use tool for non-technical people.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NovaStor NovaBACKUP?

My company has to make yearly payments towards the solution's maintenance and support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NovaStor NovaBACKUP?

The room for improvement lies in the compatibility of NovaBACKUP with older operating systems like Windows XP. Some customers still rely on outdated systems due to specific production requirements....

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 27% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 26% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 10% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Carbonite Server

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 9% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Compared 77% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Compared 23% of the time

More NovaStor NovaBACKUP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

June 2025

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

June 2025

Download NovaStor NovaBACKUP product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

NovaBACKUP

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

NovaBACKUP is a data protection software that enables SMBÂ users to backup and recover mission critical data across a hybrid of physical and virtual machines. NovaBACKUP is designed to work onÂ Microsoft Windows operating systems, offering local and online file backups and disaster recovery image backups.

NovaStor

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Ex'pression College, Osborne Wood Products Inc., REIT Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP

June 2025

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.