AWS Application Migration Service vs OpenText Migrate comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.5, while OpenText is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.0% mindshare in CM, compared to OpenText’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Application Migration S...

Read 7 AWS Application Migration Service reviews

343 Views
285 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Migrate

Read 3 OpenText Migrate reviews

569 Views
404 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

AWS Application Migration S...

OpenText Migrate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

AWS Application Migration Service and OpenText Migrate compete in the migration solutions category. AWS Application Migration Service may have an edge due to its superior integration with AWS, benefiting businesses already using AWS services.

Features: AWS Application Migration Service offers automated lift-and-shift migration, continuous data replication, and integration with AWS security tools. OpenText Migrate supports flexible migration across physical, virtual, and cloud environments with robust cross-platform compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Application Migration Service utilizes a cloud-native deployment model with extensive AWS support infrastructure. OpenText Migrate provides a versatile setup adaptable to various IT landscapes with commendable support services.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Application Migration Service usually incurs lower initial setup costs when integrated with existing AWS services, offering potentially quicker ROI for AWS-focused businesses. OpenText Migrate requires higher upfront investment due to its comprehensive cross-platform capabilities but promises significant long-term ROI through adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Application Migration Service vs. OpenText Migrate Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Application Migration Service vs. OpenText Migrate

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,499 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Application Migration S...

Ranking in Cloud Migration

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Migrate

Ranking in Cloud Migration

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Migration Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of AWS Application Migration Service is 4.0%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Migrate is 5.5%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Dieudonné-Nsabimana

Manager and Infra Solution Architect at hsag Heidelberger Services AG

Integration with other services has improved migration efficiency

A valuable feature is the schema conversion tool, which allows me to migrate databases, for example, from Oracle to Postgres. The service is fully managed by AWS, which makes it better to use the migration services. It is beneficial to enable phased migration, and the service offers easy integration with other AWS services. The integration of AWS Application Migration Service with AWS makes it a good tool for working with AWS services.

Read full review

reviewer1228836

Solutions Architect at Cognizant

Great tool for one-to-one migration, but not suitable for multi-cloud migration

Some of the tools relating to multi-cloud migration need to be improved as they have a very limited capability at this point in time. These tools are suitable for one-to-one migration scenarios but they are not fit for multi-cloud or hybrid-cloud environments. I would like to point out that I don't have a hands-on very large scale production implementation experience, as that is the job of our infra team. As I mentioned earlier, we find it very difficult to use these tools in a multi-cloud environment but they work well for single-cloud environments — from an on-premise environment to the public cloud. These tools are quite limited, making things much more complex in a multi-cloud environment. They should add a feature that supports multi-cloud and hybrid-cloud environment migration properly. The world is going to be very different five years from now, how will they support these kinds of container-based migrations? Currently, infrastructure as code is very limited. It's not as simple as just moving the server or data. The customer wants you to move the entire application, exactly as it is, and then deploy it. From that perspective, these tools offer only part of the solution, they are not fulfilling the holistic need, which the customer or organization needs. As of now, Carbonite Migrate is helpful on an infrastructure level. If we had to move 100 applications across a multi-cloud environment, then this solution would not work. In the cloud-world (the migration part of it) there needs to be better automation. Let me explain: automation refers to your infra, app, and data. Together, these three components combine and automate will provide you to deploy faster on any cloud platform. As of now, this tool doesn’t fit too much into a multi-cloud environment cloud data migrations. Together, these three components combine and automate it allowing you to deploy it. As of now, these tools cannot deploy it into a multi-cloud environment. That's where the challenge is; that's for other tools. We need to see what this product can do in terms of app, data, and infra. It is automated from the infra point of view, but not in regards to the app and data. Other vendors understand this problem and have taken the necessary steps to address it. In short, multi-cloud and hybrid-cloud environments pose a problem for this solution. I would like to know how I can take the automated path — data, app, and infra all together. That is something they need to enhance. Recently, I have seen a lot of other companies implementing AI-based automation, where more things are taken care of by AI itself, and not people. Many of these migrations are too complex for humans to analyze and form solutions. It is better to use AI platforms to create recommendations and then automate them, that way you can reduce the burden. Currently, the migration time is vast, from six months to one year, it would be impossible to do 100 application migrations. This is very time consuming and needs to be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Application Migration Service allows us to perform migrations with minimal downtime, which is crucial for our operations."

"The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."

"I rate AWS Application Migration Service a nine out of ten overall."

"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."

"Carbonite Migrate works well in Windows platform migrations and in the case of a VML platform. The migration is smooth in Windows environments."

"Carbonite Migrate is helpful on an infrastructure level."

"The solution is user-friendly."

Cons

"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."

"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."

"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."

"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."

"There are some features in the Migration Factory that could be integrated directly into AWS Application Migration Service."

"The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps."

"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."

"Carbonite failed when moving GIS data."

"We find it very difficult to use these tools in a multi-cloud environment"

"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved. During RHEL migration with multiple data areas, you have to create a similar source environment at the destination. This can be challenging because you have to install it, create the VM, install over it, and mount it at the mount point. Only then can you do the migration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For me, the price of the tool is cheap and very good. It is flexible pricing since you pay just for what you use."

"Live Migration's price is good."

"The licensing costs are really high."

"In terms of pricing, I think it's an expensive tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Live Migration?

The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps. Furthermore, I noticed that performance can vary with the source and t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Live Migration?

For the moment, I am using AWS Application Migration Service for database migration. The first use case involves moving from on-premise to EC2 hosts. Additionally, I have worked with multi-region r...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudEndure Live Migration?

The service is not complicated; I find it easy to use. For those considering AWS Application Migration Service, the advice depends on their specific needs. If it involves database migration, especi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbonite Migrate?

Carbonite was not cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Carbonite Migrate?

Carbonite failed when moving GIS data. Therefore, scalability is an issue as it struggles with migrating heavy data, specifically GIS data.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Carbonite Migrate?

We initially used Carbonite for cloud migration, specifically for moving data from one cloud to another. We moved from a RACS-based environment to VMware.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 51% of the time

More AWS Application Migration Service Competitors

HPE Zerto Software vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 33% of the time

Nutanix Move vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 31% of the time

Oracle Zero Downtime Migration vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Migration Hub vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Migrate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

July 2025

AWS Application Migration Service report

Download AWS Application Migration Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

July 2025

Download OpenText Migrate product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Live Migration

No data available

Overview

AWS Application Migration Service minimizes time-intensive, error-prone manual processes by automating the conversion of your source servers to run natively on AWS. It also simplifies application modernization with built-in and custom optimization options.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText Migrate provides a robust and efficient way to transition workloads and applications across different environments, ensuring business continuity and seamless operation in complex IT infrastructures.

OpenText Migrate simplifies the process of moving servers and applications, offering an adaptable and efficient platform that minimizes downtime and maintains data integrity during transfers. It caters to varied migrations, whether on-premise, between data centers, or to cloud environments, supporting the rapid pacing of digital transformation.

What are the key features of OpenText Migrate?

Automated Workflows: Streamline migrations with automated processes, reducing manual intervention.
Scalability: Handle large-scale migrations with the ability to scale operations to meet demand.
Data Security: Maintain security protocols to ensure data integrity throughout the migration.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitate migration across different OS and hardware configurations.
Monitoring and Reporting: Gain real-time insights and detailed reports to track migration progress.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Downtime: Achieve minimal service interruption, ensuring business continuity.
Cost Efficiency: Decrease expenses associated with manual migration efforts and errors.
Improved Performance: Benefit from optimized workloads that enhance operational efficiencies.
Enhanced Security: Protect sensitive data during the migration process, maintaining compliance.

OpenText Migrate implementations are versatile, adept at supporting industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing where IT resilience is critical. Its ability to accommodate diverse migration needs allows sectors to maintain productivity and enhance performance with minimal disruption.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Computrade Malaysia

Buyer's Guide

AWS Application Migration Service vs. OpenText Migrate

June 2025

Free Report: AWS Application Migration Service vs. OpenText Migrate

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Application Migration Service vs. OpenText Migrate and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Application Migration Service vs. OpenText Migrate report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.