AWS Application Migration Service vs OpenText Migrate​ comparison

AWS Application Migration Service vs. OpenText Migrate

Download the complete report

Helped 860,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Application Migration S...

Ranking in Cloud Migration

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Migrate

Ranking in Cloud Migration

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Migration Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of AWS Application Migration Service is 4.0%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Migrate is 5.5%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Dieudonné-Nsabimana

Manager and Infra Solution Architect at hsag Heidelberger Services AG

Integration with other services has improved migration efficiency

A valuable feature is the schema conversion tool, which allows me to migrate databases, for example, from Oracle to Postgres. The service is fully managed by AWS, which makes it better to use the migration services. It is beneficial to enable phased migration, and the service offers easy integration with other AWS services. The integration of AWS Application Migration Service with AWS makes it a good tool for working with AWS services.

Read full review

Rajesh Mehta

Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A third-party migration tool that works well in Windows environments but needs improvement in Linux environments

Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved. During RHEL migration with multiple data areas, you have to create a similar source environment at the destination. This can be challenging because you have to install it, create the VM, install over it, and mount it at the mount point. Only then can you do the migration. As a prerequisite in the case of a Windows platform, the .NET framework may cause some challenges as well. This can be done only in the latest version and is not possible in the earlier versions. We could do the migration for a customer with the older version but only after upgrading to the newer version of the .NET servers. This requires application downtime, and if the customer does not want any downtime during the migration, it can be very challenging. I would also like to see improvement in the data analytical loopholes in terms of Linux migration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten."

"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."

"I rate AWS Application Migration Service a nine out of ten overall."

"AWS Application Migration Service allows us to perform migrations with minimal downtime, which is crucial for our operations."

"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Carbonite Migrate works well in Windows platform migrations and in the case of a VML platform. The migration is smooth in Windows environments."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"Carbonite Migrate is helpful on an infrastructure level."

Cons

"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."

"The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps."

"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."

"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."

"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."

"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."

"There are some features in the Migration Factory that could be integrated directly into AWS Application Migration Service."

"Carbonite failed when moving GIS data."

"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved. During RHEL migration with multiple data areas, you have to create a similar source environment at the destination. This can be challenging because you have to install it, create the VM, install over it, and mount it at the mount point. Only then can you do the migration."

"We find it very difficult to use these tools in a multi-cloud environment"

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For me, the price of the tool is cheap and very good. It is flexible pricing since you pay just for what you use."

"Live Migration's price is good."

"The licensing costs are really high."

"In terms of pricing, I think it's an expensive tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Live Migration?

The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps. Furthermore, I noticed that performance can vary with the source and t...

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Live Migration?

For the moment, I am using AWS Application Migration Service for database migration. The first use case involves moving from on-premise to EC2 hosts. Additionally, I have worked with multi-region r...

What advice do you have for others considering CloudEndure Live Migration?

The service is not complicated; I find it easy to use. For those considering AWS Application Migration Service, the advice depends on their specific needs. If it involves database migration, especi...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbonite Migrate?

Carbonite was not cheap.

What needs improvement with Carbonite Migrate?

Carbonite failed when moving GIS data. Therefore, scalability is an issue as it struggles with migrating heavy data, specifically GIS data.

What is your primary use case for Carbonite Migrate?

We initially used Carbonite for cloud migration, specifically for moving data from one cloud to another. We moved from a RACS-based environment to VMware.

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Application Migration Service

Comparisons

Compared 51% of the time

More AWS Application Migration Service Competitors

HPE Zerto Software vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 33% of the time

Nutanix Move vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 30% of the time

Oracle Zero Downtime Migration vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Migration Hub vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Migrate Competitors

Product Reports

Cloud Migration

Download AWS Application Migration Service product report

AWS Application Migration Service report

Cloud Migration

Download OpenText Migrate product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Live Migration

No data available

Overview

AWS Application Migration Service minimizes time-intensive, error-prone manual processes by automating the conversion of your source servers to run natively on AWS. It also simplifies application modernization with built-in and custom optimization options.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText Migrate provides a robust and efficient way to transition workloads and applications across different environments, ensuring business continuity and seamless operation in complex IT infrastructures.

OpenText Migrate simplifies the process of moving servers and applications, offering an adaptable and efficient platform that minimizes downtime and maintains data integrity during transfers. It caters to varied migrations, whether on-premise, between data centers, or to cloud environments, supporting the rapid pacing of digital transformation.

What are the key features of OpenText Migrate?

Automated Workflows: Streamline migrations with automated processes, reducing manual intervention.
Scalability: Handle large-scale migrations with the ability to scale operations to meet demand.
Data Security: Maintain security protocols to ensure data integrity throughout the migration.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitate migration across different OS and hardware configurations.
Monitoring and Reporting: Gain real-time insights and detailed reports to track migration progress.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Downtime: Achieve minimal service interruption, ensuring business continuity.
Cost Efficiency: Decrease expenses associated with manual migration efforts and errors.
Improved Performance: Benefit from optimized workloads that enhance operational efficiencies.
Enhanced Security: Protect sensitive data during the migration process, maintaining compliance.

OpenText Migrate implementations are versatile, adept at supporting industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing where IT resilience is critical. Its ability to accommodate diverse migration needs allows sectors to maintain productivity and enhance performance with minimal disruption.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Computrade Malaysia

AWS Application Migration Service vs. OpenText Migrate