Canvas LMS vs Udemy Business comparison

"The solution is easy to access."

"They have a more extensive support base in terms of infrastructure."

"Its easy adaptability to whatever form or methodology you are using to teach is valuable; it tends to be seamless, and it is very much a self-intuitive product."

"Canvas LMS is user-friendly. Its assessment tools help to find the weaknesses and strengths of students."

"The assessment tools in Canvas significantly contribute to educational outcomes by allowing instructors to create and manage assessments effectively."

"The product's flexibility is exceptional."

"Overall, I believe it is a very good product."

"I used a lot of other systems in my IT career and Canvas LMS truly has everything that I would look for in an enterprise system."

"The main advantage of Udemy Business is its region-based learning. For example, if a learner from India wants to learn technology, they can find instructors from India who understand their learning style and thought process. This makes learning easier and more relatable. Additionally, Udemy Business is a global platform, so learners can access courses from instructors worldwide. A person from the USA or someone with a higher skill set can create videos. Another advantage is the range of available courses, with no limitations on what you can learn. You can get the right content for the specific technology."

"Udemy Business has positively impacted my organization by cutting costs by replacing expensive external training by 50%, accelerating project delivery through fast, on-demand upskilling, and boosting confidence, capability, and long-term retention."

"The best feature Udemy Business offers is the comprehensive course selection."

"A great platform to start the learning curve for certain categories or topics"

"Udemy Business' most valuable feature is its online workshop."

"The platform is user-friendly and straightforward to navigate."

"The solution allows us to look at training at any time at our convenience. It has a mobile app, which we can easily access to take notes."

"The best feature Udemy Business offers is the comprehensive course selection."

"The high-tech interactivity with other software, like ArcGIS or RSA Archer, can be better. It is not as easily compatible with them. You can put apps in it that the students can then access, but the routing of apps through the Canvas system slows down functionality on the other types of products."

"It would be nice to be able to do more real-time comprehensive reporting with Canvas LMS."

"The high-tech interactivity with other software, like ArcGIS or RSA Archer, can be better."

"In our working, we are encountering many challenges with Canvas LMS. One of the major area is their business model which is having a very different pricing structure. The structure is made in such a way that the license fee is needed to be paid for the complete year even if the student has been enrolled for a programme of short duration. This structure is not conducive with our needs and hence, in the past few years, been increasing our costs manifold. Along with this, Canva LMS also lacks many functionalities such as notifications and adaptive learning. There is a specific issue with the licensing model that affects us in continuous education. The inability to reuse a license for the same course in different terms hinders our cost efficiency. For instance, if a program runs from January to April, we are required to pay for the license twice within the same academic year. This contrasts with other platforms like Hyper, where reusing a license is possible, allowing us to use the same license multiple times in different terms. Along with the use, we are exploring the integration of artificial intelligence into our processes, and Canvas LMS falls short in this regard. While some platforms allow connections with external AI services, Canvas does not currently offer built-in artificial intelligence capabilities, a feature we find valuable for enhancing the learning experience."

"There are a couple of areas that could be improved. Firstly, the discussion feature is not very interactive and can be slow to respond, making it less intuitive at the moment. This is an aspect that needs substantial improvement. Another point to consider is related to the cost of the LMS system. It's perceived as relatively expensive, which has led to discussions about transitioning away from Canvas, potentially to a more cost-effective alternative. This cost-related aspect is a significant factor to consider when implementing such a system."

"The learning curve is not steep, but it is intermediate."

"Integrating more AI capabilities for the product could enhance its functionality, particularly in automating repetitive tasks and personalizing learning experiences."

"I think the main thing for first-time professors is that I probably underestimated how much work I had to put into learning how to use it the first time I used it."

"While most videos have good audio quality, some could be improved."

"However, the cost of application may not provide a tangible financial benefit."

"The platform could improve by classifying courses into beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels."

"The tool needs to improve courses on recent advancements."

"The solution could have a more user-friendly interface. You don't need to recommend the top-rated courses at the beginning of the minutes."

"Can improve by providing courses on the latest tech launches"

"Most of the courses that I would also like to enroll myself in are not free."

"One area for improvement is ensuring that courses are updated regularly. Often, courses are not updated according to the schedule mentioned by the instructors. It would be beneficial if Udemy Business had a process to evaluate and ensure timely course updates."

"The platform can be expensive for smaller organizations with fewer students."

"Canvas LMS is an affordable solution."

"Canvas LMS is low-priced compared to other vendors."

"The pricing of Canvas is satisfactory for my university. We have negotiated a good price, especially considering that we are a large university with twenty-six campuses across the country. Canvas offers a favorable pricing model for academic institutions, and the cost is reasonable. However, in continuous education, the challenge lies not in the price itself but in the business model. The requirement to pay for the entire year when our students may only use the license for a shorter duration creates challenges. The inability to adjust the licensing based on actual usage is a significant drawback for us, making the effective cost higher compared to other platforms like Hyper Learning"

"I suppose there is a license for the tool at the company level, but not for individuals."

"You can purchase individual courses and complete them at your own pace. If you want to explore more topics, you can purchase additional courses. It's a one-time purchase for each course, not a monthly subscription."

"Udemy Business' pricing is moderate."

"We have individual subscriptions for five to six users."

"The tool's pricing is good and reasonable."

"The platform offers decent pricing"

"You can test the tool monthly and then switch to yearly licensing. The pricing is reasonable."

"The system provides good value for its cost, as evidenced by its widespread adoption across organizations of various sizes. Whether it's mid-level or high-level organizations, many are implementing it. Pricing is based on subscriptions and the number of users."