Canonical Bazaar and GitHub are competitive products in the version control market. GitHub gains an advantage with its extensive feature set and widespread adoption.
Features: Canonical Bazaar is designed with a decentralized architecture, supporting independent branches and offline activities. GitHub’s strong points include its wide integration options, advanced collaboration tools, and powerful interaction abilities for team projects.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Canonical Bazaar features a straightforward deployment process suited for users looking for uncomplicated setups. GitHub's deployment, although streamlined, involves a learning phase due to its extensive capabilities. Canonical Bazaar provides traditional customer support, whereas GitHub benefits from a wealth of online resources and active community support.
Pricing and ROI: Canonical Bazaar generally offers lower initial setup costs, attracting smaller teams. GitHub’s pricing may involve higher upfront expenses but offers greater ROI with superior project visibility and productivity functions, proving valuable for users requiring advanced tools.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| GitHub | 8.2% |
| Canonical Bazaar | 1.6% |
| Other | 90.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
