Camunda and CMW Tracker compete in the business process management space. Camunda has the upper hand in user satisfaction regarding pricing, while CMW Tracker is preferred for extensive functionalities.
Features: Camunda is known for strong process automation, open-source flexibility, and customizable solutions attractive to developers. CMW Tracker excels in workflow management, offering pre-built templates, intuitive process visualization, and features catering to non-technical teams.
Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance user-friendliness for non-developers, offer more out-of-the-box integrations, and improve interface intuitiveness. CMW Tracker might benefit from more customization options, advanced technical capabilities for developers, and enhanced API functionality.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda is favored for integration capabilities with existing systems, providing a seamless transition for teams already using other technical stacks. CMW Tracker is praised for easy deployment and steady customer support, appealing to companies prioritizing implementation ease.
Pricing and ROI: Camunda offers a lower entry cost with a scalable pricing model, offering favorable ROI for long-term projects. CMW Tracker, though more of an upfront investment, justifies pricing with features leading to quick productivity gains.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
It allows for easy scaling, especially with ECS service configurations.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
AWS pricing is very competitive compared to Azure and cheap compared to Google.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
EC2 makes scaling horizontally incredibly easy, especially when working under the ECS service.
The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Camunda | 16.0% |
| CMW Tracker | 0.4% |
| Other | 83.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.
Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.
What are Camunda's key features?In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.
CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.
CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.
What are the main features of CMW Tracker?CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
