

Camunda and CMW Tracker compete in the business process management (BPM) software space. Camunda stands out with its feature-rich platform, while CMW Tracker offers more deployment flexibility and potentially better ROI due to its adaptable pricing.
Features: Camunda provides an open-source platform with high scalability, seamless integration, and robust performance, ideal for complex enterprise processes. On the other hand, CMW Tracker is known for its user-friendly interface, low-code development capabilities, and extensive customization, enhancing agile project management.
Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance its user experience for non-developers, offering more intuitive tools for those less technically inclined. Some users find integration with legacy systems challenging. Additionally, expanding community and professional support options could be beneficial. CMW Tracker might improve by offering more robust enterprise-level features, ensuring better scalability, and enhancing API capabilities for more seamless integrations with external applications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda provides detailed documentation and both cloud and on-premise deployments, though some users seek more personalized support. CMW Tracker excels with agile, cloud-based deployment options and responsive customer service, providing quick implementations and flexible support options.
Pricing and ROI: Camunda offers a more conventional pricing structure, which can lead to higher upfront costs but promises long-term ROI for large enterprises. CMW Tracker's flexible pricing models allow for lower initial investment and quicker returns, appealing to businesses seeking budget-friendly solutions.
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate them a 10 for support.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
It allows for easy scaling, especially with ECS service configurations.
They have that REST layer, REST APIs layer that makes it easy to integrate and make it part of a microservices ecosystem and APIs.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
We were not really concerned about the performance on the process itself because it was super simple, super straightforward, and it did not present itself as a bottleneck, nor did we feel it was adding additional time in the execution.
Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
For some services, such as hosting databases, Google is really expensive.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
ECS also allows for horizontal scalability with thresholds that can be configured for CPU or memory.
Camunda's support for BPMN 2.0 is a great advantage because it allows us to have a common language to discuss technology and business in the same perspective.
The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Camunda | 9.9% |
| CMW Tracker | 0.9% |
| Other | 89.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.
Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.
What are Camunda's key features?
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.
CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.
CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.
What are the main features of CMW Tracker?CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.