CA Process Automation vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #37, while IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CA Process Automation

Read 12 CA Process Automation reviews

276 Views
84 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Read 5 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews

146 Views
68 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

CA Process Automation

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and CA Process Automation compete in the business process management sector. The robust functionality of IBM WebSphere BPMS appeals to users, while CA Process Automation is favored for its streamlined processes and cost effectiveness.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS integrates well with various systems and excels in process modeling, ensuring comprehensive functionality. Its wide-ranging features include scalability and fault-tolerance, vital for complex environments. In contrast, CA Process Automation offers customization, flexibility, and a user-friendly interface, emphasizing adaptability. The platform supports seamless workflow automation with diverse integration options, enhancing user interaction.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve by simplifying its user interface and reducing its complexity for non-technical users. Licensing costs could be a barrier for smaller organizations. Better initial setup guidance might be beneficial. CA Process Automation might improve its robustness for larger scale deployments. Increased transparency on workflow bottlenecks and failure points could enhance its operations. Additional native integration support could further amplify its versatility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers strong customer service with a well-supported deployment model, suitable for complex IT infrastructures. CA Process Automation features an easy deployment process known for quick integration, appealing to users seeking simplicity and rapid outcomes.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS incurs higher initial setup costs, which may extend ROI timelines but provides value through its extensive features over time. CA Process Automation offers a more cost-effective initial investment with a faster ROI due to its efficient deployment and immediate benefits in process optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Process Automation vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Process Automation

Ranking in Process Automation

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of CA Process Automation is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

it_user464568

Design Lead at CSC

Provides the ability to import objects as new versions of existing objects and to make the prior version the current version.

CA offers minimal public information pertaining to the performance drain the usage of some objects and operators introduce to processing. As an example, swim lanes within a process provide an excellent means of organizing operators within a process, but they can introduce substantial performance issues. As another example, it’s better to perform verbose JavaScript execution within a Run JavaScript operator instead of within another operator’s pre- or post-execution script. As yet another example, it’s better to hard-code variables within the process dataset as opposed to creating the variables at run-time. The biggest issue for me is its lack of support for current JavaScript methods and functions, which makes scripts unnecessarily longer than they need to be. It seemed I could only rely on the methods and functions available in ECMA 1 (which was released in 1997), but that wasn’t a deal-breaker and the product is capable of extending its capabilities through the inclusion of other code libraries.

Read full review

Samuel Tsang

Senior Project Manager at Bank Of China(Hong Kong) Limited

Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing

The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."

"This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests."

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."

"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

Cons

"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."

"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."

"It needs auto-triggering of workflows based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)."

"OCR capability should be added as a feature."

"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

"The solution lacks acceptable stability."

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."

"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?

There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?

We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?

I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation

April 2025

Download CA Process Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS

April 2025

Download IBM WebSphere BPMS product report

Also Known As

CA IT Process Automation Manager

WebSphere BPMS

Overview

CA Process Automation is designed to speed the delivery of IT services while helping to remove manual errors. By defining, automating and orchestrating processes across organizational silos that use disparate systems, CA Process Automation helps improve productivity while also enforcing standards. With CA Process Automation, you can automate IT processes that span multiple organizations and systems, reduce the time it takes to deliver services and enforce standards and compliance policies across departments. CA Process Automation helps you automate IT processes to reduce operational expenses, increase staff productivity, speed IT service delivery, improve service quality, and enforce compliance policies.

Broadcom

Information not available

IBM

Sample Customers

Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

April 2025

Free Report: CA Process Automation vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Process Automation vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Process Automation vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.