CA IDMS vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

CA IDMS and VMware Tanzu Data Solutions are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. CA IDMS is ranked #29, while VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9. CA IDMS holds a 1.3% mindshare in DDM, compared to VMware Tanzu Data Solutions’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CA IDMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions users who would recommend it.

CA IDMS

Read 5 CA IDMS reviews

1,208 Views
809 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 89 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

9,944 Views
2,486 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CA IDMS

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and CA IDMS are competing products in the realm of data management and application deployment. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions often takes the lead due to its modern infrastructure compatibility, while CA IDMS excels with its robust legacy system support, offering intrinsic value for enterprises reliant on mainframe environments.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is notable for its integration across cloud platforms and container orchestration, providing flexibility and scalability. Its cloud-native architecture ensures seamless deployment across various environments, facilitating easy scaling and integration. CA IDMS is distinguished by its high-performance database management suited for large-scale mainframe applications. It also offers reliable OLTP performance and stability with a focus on maintaining consistent performance in legacy environments. Additionally, CA IDMS continues to support applications developed decades ago, ensuring enduring operational effectiveness.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions could enhance its legacy integration capabilities to better accommodate organizations transitioning from older systems. Another area of potential improvement is optimizing cost management for extensive deployments. VMware could also expand its support documentation to assist new users. CA IDMS would benefit from modernizing its user interface to match contemporary standards. It could also broaden its compatibility with cloud environments to cater to organizations using hybrid systems. Additionally, easing the deployment process could reduce reliance on specialized knowledge, making it more accessible.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers streamlined deployment with container-based architectures, making it more adaptable for modern IT environments. Its cloud-native approach simplifies the onboarding process. CA IDMS requires specialized deployment knowledge, reflecting its legacy roots. Both solutions provide solid customer service, although the complexity of CA IDMS may require more targeted support.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions generally demands a higher initial investment justified by its cloud-native capabilities, presenting a dynamic ROI for evolving IT strategies. Its flexible pricing can accommodate scalable deployments. CA IDMS, with its traditional format, has a more predictable cost structure offering stable returns, especially for long-term enterprise mainframe investments.

To learn more, read our detailed CA IDMS vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA IDMS vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA IDMS

Ranking in Database Development and Management

29th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Database Development and Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (12th), Data Warehouse (6th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of CA IDMS is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 2.8%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	2.8%
CA IDMS	1.3%
Other	95.9%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

Alfredo Silva

ALiBS Solutions at ALiBS Solutions

Helps us to manage user profiles very quickly and in an assertive way

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. I would advise that they should evaluate other possibilities because this is a very quickly changing environment and there are other possible providers that have good solutions. I would do some kind of test. I would test other possible solutions too and compare them.

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Sr. Manager at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful feature is the governance feature, because it can show us and help us to manage user profiles very quickly and using it in assertive way."

"Stability is perfect! It is a really stable platform; it has been around for many years, and we trust it implicitly."

"Technical support is very good. They are very knowledgeable, very quick to respond, and very nice people, too."

"The solution is the community - a tightly knit group of experts who have been working on the product set for many years."

"The most valuable feature is the performance of the database; it's very efficient at what it does, quite reliable, and provides us with a very stable platform that we've been running for many years."

"We've been able to fine tune it over the years to get really good performance out of it, and maintain some database network support."

"We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another."

"We have been using GemFire for a Telco project, which we need process network data in real time and meanwhile access some reference data, and GemFire has done a great job, as we have managed to process over 200,000 messages per second."

"The most valuable feature for us is horizontal scaling."

"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."

"The previous data warehouse was built in Oracle, and one of the things which has improved in GreenPlum is that we can query millions of rows at speed, without creating lags."

"It's one of the fastest databases in the market."

"One of the key benefits for us has been the ability to use this solution for microservice architecture communications because it provides great flexibility."

"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."

Cons

"I would like to see it made simpler to operate and maintain."

"Right now, it's not easy to start using this solution. You have to take long course and train people. It's not an easy path."

"We have to use DB2 when we need more relational constructs, expanded inquiry and reporting; so it's not perfect in that regards."

"I'd like to see some of the installation, maintenance, and support functions simplified so that some of our younger, newer members can take advantage of the product and maintain it to the same standard that the older members have in the past."

"We need to make it much easier to support and maintain, because the skills required are quite specialized and we're not going to have people in the future who've got the necessary experience and knowledge."

"We seem to be replacing a disk on the appliance every week."

"The Greenplum appliance itself has had some reliability issues, so it would be great if that could be improved in the next version."

"It doesn't work as efficiently as we'd like because it requires more segment node capacity (size, RAM, CPU) than we currently have."

"The initial deployment was a little difficult."

"It needs a much more robust and user friendly monitoring and management front-end tool."

"We had a bit of an issue with stability."

"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."

"Tanzu Greenplum's compression for GPText could be made more efficient."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Do not hold back on asking questions about the maintenance and continued support of the product."

"This is an open source solution."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"The price is pretty good."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"The pricing is okay."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu GemFire?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is that it is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu GemFire?

In terms of weak points in VMware Tanzu Data Solutions, pricing is always the root cause of people not wanting to renew licenses or do any upgrades.

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC AMI DevX vs CA IDMS

Compared 20% of the time

CA Datacom vs CA IDMS

Compared 17% of the time

IBM IMS vs CA IDMS

Compared 15% of the time

Spotlight vs CA IDMS

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Coherence vs CA IDMS

Compared 8% of the time

More CA IDMS Competitors

Teradata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

July 2026

Download CA IDMS product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

July 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

IDMS

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

CA IDMS is a robust database management system known for its reliability in handling high-volume transactions. It serves as a proven enterprise solution providing cost-effective data management for large organizations.

CA IDMS is optimized for environments requiring consistent performance under heavy transaction loads. Its architecture facilitates integration with modern applications, ensuring data availability and integrity. Often chosen by large enterprises, it's particularly beneficial for businesses needing scalable and dependable database solutions. CA IDMS supports extensive data models, allowing organizations to capture complex relationships efficiently.

What are the key features of CA IDMS?

High Performance: Ensures stable operation under demanding workloads.
Reliability: Provides consistent uptime and robust data protection.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing data and transaction volumes.
Security: Strong measures to protect data integrity and privacy.
Integration: Compatible with emerging technologies and applications.

What benefits and ROI should one expect from CA IDMS?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with low maintenance requirements.
Enhanced Data Management: Simplifies complex data handling processes.
Business Continuity: Minimizes downtime ensuring seamless business operations.
Adaptability: Aligns with evolving technology needs without significant overhauls.

CA IDMS finds implementation in industries such as finance, healthcare, and government where data integrity and high availability are critical. Its role is essential in legacy systems that require modernization while maintaining operational reliability, providing a reliable backbone to IT infrastructures facing modernization challenges.

Broadcom

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Blue Hill Data Services Inc.

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

CA IDMS vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

August 2026

Free Report: CA IDMS vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about CA IDMS vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA IDMS vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.