Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

C3M Cloud Control [EOL] vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks comparison

CyberArk and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category. Additionally, 100% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto N...
Read 113 Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks reviews
  • 21,981 Views
  • 12,309 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and C3M Cloud Control [EOL] compete in cloud security solutions. Prisma Cloud leads with superior support and pricing structures, while C3M Cloud Control [EOL] stands out with advanced features.

Features:Prisma Cloud integrates multifaceted security measures, threat detection across various cloud environments, and automated remediation capabilities. C3M Cloud Control [EOL] provides continuous compliance management and robust risk assessment tools, with the main differentiator being Prisma Cloud's extensive support for multi-cloud environments and C3M Cloud's compliance focus.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Prisma Cloud emphasizes a seamless deployment process and proactive customer support, aligning with diverse IT infrastructures. C3M Cloud Control [EOL] offers straightforward deployment tailored for compliance checks and attentive support. Prisma's deployment flexibility suits complex ecosystems, while C3M Cloud’s approach benefits compliance-centric security needs.

Pricing and ROI:Prisma Cloud features competitively structured pricing aligned with organizational security scales, often leading to favorable ROI due to its broad functionality. C3M Cloud Control [EOL] presents a value proposition through specialized compliance capabilities, offering excellent ROI for businesses prioritizing regulatory adherence. The distinction lies in Prisma Cloud's broad value without compromising cost versus C3M’s niche-focused financial advantage.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,889 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

C3M Cloud Control [EOL]
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto N...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (8th), Container Security (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (2nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (2nd), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

BRUNO REYNAUD - PeerSpot reviewer
BRUNO REYNAUD
Information Security Engineer - Pre-sales at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reduces analysts workload, highly reliable, and scales well
We utilize C3M Cloud Control solely for demonstration purposes as there are limited cloud-based assets to work with. Our aim is to showcase to customers how they can reduce unnecessary permissions in their cloud environment The remediation capability of C3M Cloud Control is its most valuable…
Read full review
reviewer2776578 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2776578
Cyber Security Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Image scanning has supported consistent security practices during cloud deployment
On a scale of ten, we would say people are happy with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks for the part we use. People are okay with it. We probably would give an eight. We don't give ten because if we don't use the other parts of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, it's because it was difficult to implement from an operational point of view. We could have deployed the runtime monitoring with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but within our organization at our company, it was very difficult to find who would be the owner for the alerts. People have other tools and in the end, we don't use the full capabilities of a product that we pay for. It's partially related to the difficulty to integrate Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks runtime in our company's support process. We don't use the real-time monitoring part of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. We don't know about the automated remediation feature of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The remediation capability of C3M Cloud Control is its most valuable feature as it significantly reduces the workload for analysts, saving them a considerable amount of time."
"We haven't had an issue with stability so far."
"It has a feature for customized security policy. I implement it in banking, health insurance, and other sectors, and every organization has its own customized policies and procedures. In Prisma Cloud, you can customize policies, and based on that, you can do monitoring."
"The most valuable features of Prisma Cloud are its cloud security posture management and cloud workload protection capabilities."
"The ability to monitor the artifact repository is one of the most valuable features because we have a disparate set of development processes, but everything tends to land in a common set of artifact repositories. The solution gives us a single point where we can apply security control for monitoring. That's really helpful."
"Syslog CLIs are the best feature."
"I've been really pleasantly surprised with how Prisma Cloud is, over time, covering more and more of the topics I care about, and listening to customer feedback and growing the product in the right directions."
"Cloud security posture management is the preferred feature among other vendors."
"It scans our containers in real time. Also, as they're built, it's looking into the container repository where the images are built, telling us ahead of time, "You have vulnerabilities here, and you should update this code before you deploy." And once it's deployed, it's scanning for vulnerabilities that are in production as the container is running."
"It has improved the overall collaboration between SecOps and DevOps. Now, instead of asking people to do something, it is a default offering in the CI/CD. There is less manual intervention and more seamless integration. It is why we don't have many dependencies across many teams, which is definitely a better state."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks pros
 

Cons

"C3M Cloud Control could improve by adding features to support infrastructure instead of only trying to solve identities in the cloud."
"From our perspective, at this point, we need something called risk scoring as you get a lot of alerts, and sometimes you don't know which one's really going to cost if you don't take care of it. We need to understand, at a glance, which items are priorities."
"We don't give ten because if we don't use the other parts of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, it's because it was difficult to implement from an operational point of view."
"It would be nice Prisma Cloud merged its modules for CSPM and infrastructure as code. It would simplify the pricing and make it easier for customers to evaluate the solution because there are different modules, and you need to add it to your subscription separately."
"The information presented in the UI sometimes doesn't look intuitive enough."
"They are missing some compatibility details in their documentation."
"The licensing is a bit confusing."
"A couple of exporting functionalities should be more user-friendly because if I want to export something, I can get a lot of data visible to that particular CSV."
"While the documentation continually improves, it still has limitations compared to the extensive resources available for older products like hardware firewalls, which have been around for approximately 20 years."
"There should be some kind of automation, AI incorporation, and bot system. All these would add value."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the support of C3M Cloud Control an eight out of ten."
"Prisma Cloud is affordable."
"The purchasing process was easy and quick. It is a very economical solution."
"Prisma Cloud is quite scalable. In our current licensing model, we're able to heavily extend our cloud workload and onboard a lot of customers. It really helps, and it is on par with other solutions."
"Our licensing fees are $18,000 USD per year."
"The pricing and the licensing are both very fair... The biggest advice I would give in terms of costs would be to try to understand what the growth is going to look like. That's really been our biggest struggle, that we don't have an idea of what our future growth is going to be on the platform. We go from X number of licenses to Y number of licenses without a plan on how we're going to get from A to B, and a lot of that comes as a bit of a surprise. It can make budgeting a real challenge for it."
"The price is high. In the future, when there are more competitors at the same level with different clouds, maybe the position will be different."
"Prisma Cloud is more expensive than Check Point CloudGuard."
"The product is very expensive, but the cost is a necessary evil; I don't know how we could have any kind of cloud presence without this type of monitoring. The pricing is calculated by module and resource usage. Ultimately, it saves us money in the amount of time we would spend uncovering what it uncovers, and we might not make the required discoveries without it anyway. Prisma offers incredible value, though I wish it were cheaper."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business36
Midsize Enterprise22
Large Enterprise56
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your primary use case for Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?
Prisma Cloud helps support DevSecOps methodologies, making those responsibilities easier to manage.
See all answers
What Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform do you recommend?
We like Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, since it offers us incredible visibility into our entire cloud system. We are able to easily see where our container vulnerabilities lie and and where cl...
See all answers
What do you think of Aqua Security vs Prisma Cloud?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Wiz vs C3M Cloud Control [EOL] Logo
Wiz vs C3M Cloud Control [EOL]
Compared 100% of the time
More C3M Cloud Control [EOL] Competitors
Wiz vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Wiz vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Compared 11% of the time
Cyera vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Cyera vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Compared 7% of the time
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Compared 5% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Compared 4% of the time
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
December 2025
C3M Cloud Control [EOL] reportDownload C3M Cloud Control [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
December 2025
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks reportDownload Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Prisma Public Cloud, RedLock Cloud 360, RedLock, Twistlock, Aporeto
 

Overview

C3M Cloud Control is a 100% API based Cloud Security Posture Management and Compliance Assurance platform that offers an enterprise complete cloud control through actionable cloud security intelligence across your AWS, GCP, and Azure infrastructure.

CyberArk

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive cloud-native security solutions. It covers dynamic workload identity, automated forensics, and multi-cloud protection, ensuring robust security across diverse cloud platforms.

Prisma Cloud delivers advanced capabilities for managing cloud security across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms. It offers dynamic workload identity creation, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. With automation, centralized dashboards, and enhanced visibility, users effectively manage security misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. While optimizing cloud environments through runtime protection and compliance, Prisma Cloud faces challenges with its navigation, pricing, and limited automation capabilities. Users seek improvements in API security, role-based access controls, and documentation quality, emphasizing the need for enhanced customization and reporting features.

What are the important features of Prisma Cloud?

  • Dynamic Workload Identity: Enables unique workload identities for security purposes.
  • Automated Forensics: Offers detailed insights into threats and incidents automatically.
  • Runtime Protection: Provides ongoing detection and blocking of suspicious activities.
  • Multi-Cloud Security: Protects environments on AWS, Azure, and GCP simultaneously.
  • Compliance Management: Assists in meeting regulatory standards across cloud platforms.

What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?

  • Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens cloud defense lines with proactive monitoring.
  • Centralized Dashboard: Offers unified oversight of multiple cloud environments.
  • Efficient Misconfiguration Handling: Quickly identifies and addresses security lapses.
  • Seamless CI/CD Integration: Integrates security within development workflows.
  • Improved Visibility: Provides transparent insights into security operations and alerts.

Industries like finance and telecom rely on Prisma Cloud for managing cloud security posture and container security. Teams utilize its capabilities across hybrid and multi-cloud settings to ensure compliance and robust threat protection. Features like misconfiguration detection and runtime monitoring are critical in promoting security objectives in these sectors.

Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Amgen, Genpact, Western Asset, Zipongo, Proofpoint, NerdWallet, Axfood, 21st Century Fox, Veeva Systems, Reinsurance Group of America
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
December 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne and others in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM). Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.