No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs OpenText Service Virtualization vs Parasoft Virtualize comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 29.6%, down from 35.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Service Virtualization is 14.7%, down from 18.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft Virtualize is 27.0%, up from 16.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization29.6%
Parasoft Virtualize27.0%
OpenText Service Virtualization14.7%
Other28.700000000000003%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Marco Technology
Is scalable and easy to use, but the monitoring feature needs improvement
The support for Micro Focus Service Virtualization is better than that for other products. The technical support staff are highly skilled. Sometimes, we don't have to open a ticket. We can just go into the community and then talk to them directly. I would rate technical support at seven out of ten.
SP
Solutions Architect at InfoStretch
Easy to set up and scale but needs more data virtualization capabilities
I'm working with a service organization and I'm working for a client and that client requires this solution. That's why we use it. Basically, we are just a customer and end-user. The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. If the product could do more things, I'd give it higher marks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Easy to understand ways of creating stubs."
"The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature."
"We have been using it extensively for the shift left process and testing, and it helps us to accelerate and virtualize services and assets that we don't have, enabling us to test faster."
"The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET."
"The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services, especially in creating IBM MQ virtual services through recording."
"We have saved a lot in terms of the time it takes to test data setup infrastructure and turn around time for testing."
"Without trying other products in the service virtualize space, I feel very comfortable working with this product."
"Having a virtual service to rely on, we’re able to continue development even when one of their services fails."
"Service Virtualization plays a major role in transforming your development, testing, and operating engineer into a business engineer."
"The feature which is most valuable in this solution is the ease of use. The product is very easy to use and very easy to implement."
"I was blown away with how fast the implementation was."
"We used technical support once in a while. The support is fantastic."
"We choose HPE servers because they're rock solid."
"The support for integration patterns and the ease of use to wizard-based utility is what I would consider the most important features for service virtualization platforms."
"With this solution, you don't have to use your production services for implementing other software uses."
"HPE SV helped me and my ALM team minimize workforce, reduce costs, and transition from hardware to virtualization; my software is more secure preproduction."
"The technical support is very good, with short lines and short response times from well-skilled technical employees."
"Using Virtualize, this dependency has been removed completely, allowing the test team to provision many more orders in shorter time, enabling them to test much more, much faster."
"Service Virtualization has provided a way to move forward where we do not find any way to go."
"Parasoft Virtualization allowed us to create a simulated environment and test the code before entering the testing cycle."
"The initial setup is quite easy to manage."
"The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far."
"Easy testing environment creation. No need to have deep development/infrastructure knowledge."
"We now have the ability to test our complex applications completely detached from integration middleware, which improves the reliability, speed, cost, and simplicity of testing."
 

Cons

"VSE Console should be more user friendly."
"We had to implement an external service catalog. We put it in ServiceNow. I would like to see an integrated service catalog."
"I'd like to see more of the newer technologies included in there, looking mainly from a mobile perspective, possibly, so you can virtualize some of the aspects that we're going to be doing for mobile testing."
"As far as the next version of it is concerned, probably some additional lightweight, portable elements."
"Further integration into non-CA test suites will be beneficial."
"Licensing definitely needs more flexible models. Too many complicated parameters also makes it difficult for us to explain them to our customers."
"Competitors have more user friendly user interfaces and some have front end systems which are easy to toggle and manipulate."
"The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to support virtualization for performance testing. This is a costly component."
"The integration with other solutions, such as ALM and Jira, should be improved."
"Pricing is always a concern for our clients, so my guess is if anything can be beat it's price."
"More support for different protocols. I would love to see more wizards rather than relying on some custom coding, which you can use C# as well as Visual Basic scripting."
"The monitoring feature is not impressive because they use Windows for so much monitoring. They set a lock on the window, and then we have to gather the information from the main monitoring feature in the Windows server. There is not enough capacity for problem solving performance issues."
"HPE products are good, but they never make a product for a specific use."
"The developers area Performance testers"
"Early on though, we saw some stability issues with the design that would occasionally crash."
"The current protocol needs to be updated to be much more flexible. The product needs more technical flexibility in implementation and customization."
"JMS Queue Monitoring: When deploying the TIBCO JMS monitor, we saw an approximately 50% failure rate in detecting the desired event."
"It should have more fine-grained authorization."
"It is somewhat complex regarding its configuration setup with different technologies."
"When Virtualize is running on a (virtual) machine with limited memory, over time it might consume more and more memory and (worst case) stall."
"Performance enhancement for large payloads."
"This product is too expensive when scaling."
"Only about the memory, if you don't meet the minimum RAM required, performance is not stable."
"It would be ideal if the product offered more in terms of data virtualization or have a separate product that could be combined with this one that could offer a bit more in order to cover more of our requirements."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"Micro Service Virtualization is very expensive. The pricing of this product is in line with all of the other big name-brand products."
"It's an expensive solution, but you can get discounts. You have to buy one server and one designer together, for example, and it may cost 15 million Thai Baht."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
890,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Construction Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
Micro Focus Service Virtualization, HPE Service Virtualization
Parasoft Service Virtualization
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Virgin Media, TTNet
Alaska Airlines, Cox Automotive, Comcast, Lufthansa, Samsung, WoodmenLife, Caesars Entertainment, Capital One, REI
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Tricentis, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: April 2026.
890,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.