Broadcom Payment Security vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
305 views|198 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAS Logo
1,206 views|671 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom Payment Security and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially.""I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze.""I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics.""The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and""For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."

More Broadcom Payment Security Pros →

"The security is also very good.""The solution is easy to use."

More SAS Fraud Management Pros →

Cons
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising.""I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works.""Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution.""The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0.""This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."

More Broadcom Payment Security Cons →

"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."

More SAS Fraud Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
  • More Broadcom Payment Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
  • More SAS Fraud Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    305
    Comparisons
    198
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,206
    Comparisons
    671
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Find the balance. Payment Security delivers more secure online transactions with an excellent customer experience.

    Card-not-present (CNP) fraud costs billions of dollars annually across the globe. Issuers, processors and merchants need new applications to fight back with security that doesn’t get in the way of business.

    Broadcom has the answer. With our industry-leading authentication solutions, you benefit from:

    • The largest global consortium network of real-time transaction data
    • Patented predictive neural network models for highly accurate, real-time decision-making
    • Unsurpassed leadership in EMV 3-D Secure

    You maintain full control over your authentication strategy, fraud systems and policies. Simply said, our solutions help you lower your costs and accelerate your business success.

    Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time.

    Sample Customers
    Eurocard
    Nets
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company28%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Construction Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Broadcom Payment Security is ranked 23rd in Fraud Detection and Prevention while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Broadcom Payment Security is rated 8.8, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Payment Security writes "Versatility in rule variables allows for customization and optimization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". Broadcom Payment Security is most compared with Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS), whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.