No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Fraud Management
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Fraud Management is 2.0%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SAS Fraud Management2.0%
Broadcom Payment Security1.7%
Other96.3%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
reviewer1562526 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Practice at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Scalable and easy to use but could have better technical support
The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable and the performance has been very good so far. That said, from my perspective, has had some issues with stability and performance issues in that they have a lot of data and it has some indexing and mechanisms that work a bit slow.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Helped reduce 3-D Secure losses to one of the lowest in the industry while having minimal customer impact."
"For a bank, we've seen transactions move to e-commerce. We needed a solution that would protect the bank and protect the bank's cardholders, and that's what this solution gives us."
"I advise anyone that is looking for a payment security product to choose this solution."
"They are excellent."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."
"I think stability-wise, we've not really had any issues in terms of stability."
"This is a good product, which is easy to deploy and has lot of user friendly features."
"Let's put it this way, it's like going from Larder to a Ferrari."
"The solution is very stable; there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, and it has been reliable with very good performance so far."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The security is also very good."
"Presently, the main purpose of SAS is to maintain a centralized platform for all of the verticals — like agriculture, NSME, and home loans — where the bank can monitor everything from one system."
 

Cons

"There have been service outages/incidents and work has to be chased, for completion or comment."
"The deployment process needs to be updated to ensure the base code does not involve details of other clients."
"An area of improvement for this product would be the ability to view more transactional data to determine the cause of a failed transaction."
"Sometimes, there is a bit of language issue of understanding problems."
"At the moment, getting into that rich data is quite an effort."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"That's the one complaint we have had is the lack of mobile signal."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
"It is a little bit costly."
"Technical support could be much quicker and much more flexible."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
17%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Comms Service Provider
18%
Educational Organization
8%
Wholesaler/Distributor
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Nets
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. SAS Fraud Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.