Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Payment Security vs Riskified vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 0.6%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Riskified is 4.6%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Fraud Management is 4.5%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAS Fraud Management4.5%
Riskified4.6%
Broadcom Payment Security0.6%
Other90.3%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
JJ
Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful
The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function. I am satisfied with the documentation it provides. It integrates well with other products The user interface could be more intuitive. I have been familiar with Riskified for three years. Riskified is a…
reviewer1562526 - PeerSpot reviewer
Scalable and easy to use but could have better technical support
The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable and the performance has been very good so far. That said, from my perspective, has had some issues with stability and performance issues in that they have a lot of data and it has some indexing and mechanisms that work a bit slow.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"
"The scoring mechanism is good."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."
"The security is also very good."
"The solution is easy to use."
 

Cons

"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"It is determined by the requirements of each company."
"If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
868,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
18%
Retailer
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
University
6%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
ALDO, Macy's, Finish Line, Burlington, Burton Group, Sky-tours, GiftCards.com, Kirna Zabête
Nets
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: August 2025.
868,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.