Board vs Oracle HFM comparison

Board International and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Board International is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Board International holds a 4.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Board International users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Board

Read 37 Board reviews

2,059 Views
1,050 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle HFM

Read 17 Oracle HFM reviews

1,585 Views
1,347 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Board

Oracle HFM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Board and Oracle HFM are financial software solutions, each having its strengths. Board excels in pricing and support, while Oracle HFM justifies its cost with robust features.

Features: Board offers integration and customizable dashboards, flexibility for varied business needs, and allows multidimensional analysis and data normalization from different sources. Oracle HFM provides extensive financial management and compliance capabilities, supports multi-currency translations, and handles complex ownership calculations.

Room for Improvement: Board could improve in handling complex consolidations, standardizing currency exchanges, and enhancing user interface customization. Oracle HFM would benefit from a more straightforward deployment process, streamlined integration with non-Oracle systems, and additional flexibility in configuration settings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Board provides a quicker deployment process with excellent support, making it ideal for faster implementations. Oracle HFM requires more time for setup due to its complex functionalities but offers strong customer service for guidance through the process.

Pricing and ROI: Board is more cost-effective, offering enhanced ROI through affordability and efficient performance. Oracle HFM, although initially more expensive, offers long-term value for organizations that need advanced financial management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. Oracle HFM Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Oracle HFM

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Board

Ranking in Business Performance Management

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (22nd), Reporting (17th)

Oracle HFM

Ranking in Business Performance Management

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Board is 4.8%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle HFM is 5.1%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle HFM	5.1%
Board	4.8%
Other	90.1%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2645016

Manager, Software Delivery at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Offers flexibility in design and saves time in budgeting and forecasting processes

I find Board to be simple and easy to use. It offers significant flexibility in designing solutions. The system overall is very useful, with many capabilities that provide flexibility. Our budgeting and forecasting processes support around three hundred twenty users who would otherwise rely on Excel, making Board invaluable for saving time.

Read full review

Segun Oladele

Associate Manager, Accounting at BIC

Has supported financial consolidation through accurate reporting and global currency conversion

Oracle HFM is excellent for consolidation and reconciliation. It helps me see the general overview of the business across several locations. The drill-through reporting enhances accuracy in financial analysis. Oracle HFM has a schedule that requires reporting, especially one that ties back to my general ledger. I have to report each line item that comprises that number. It helps me fact-check reported numbers with a schedule. For example, with payables, Oracle HFM allows me to have a list of numbers reported per supplier. This provides comfort that the numbers are not fictitious. Additionally, it has a feature that performs fact-checking from P&L to balance sheet. For instance, if depreciation is reported, it must align with what is in the profit or loss account. These features ensure integrity in the reported numbers and allow for quick error detection while serving as a reconciliation tool. The currency conversion feature provides a global view from entity currency to local currency perspective, enabling value checks in different currencies for the company as a whole. In Nigeria, I report in Naira, and I don't need to report in my parent currency. The entity can report in their currency into Oracle HFM, and the parent company converts to their currency. By inputting budget rates, I can convert to any reporting currency, particularly the parent company currency. This feature saves time, increases speed, and allows the parent company to value its subsidiaries quickly. Regarding data integration capabilities for ensuring data consistency and accuracy, it deserves a high rating. For example, with inventory, if there is an impairment, the reported amount in P&L should match the balance sheet's inventory impairment. This level of checking provides confidence in the accuracy of reported figures.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of being able to get the data into BOARD is what makes it nice for people with a semi-IT background."

"Primary valuable features are its flexibility and versatility and, obviously, functionality goes along with that. Plus, it does that at a small footprint in the file servers, and does it very efficiently."

"The benefits are getting the data in one spot, the ability to report dynamically, and version control."

"The flexibility and the user-experience are the most valuable features of the solution."

"I think the product is good in terms of ease of use."

"BOARD technical support is knowledgeable and helpful."

"It is very easy to use. It has got what they call a toolkit, which is a no-code development environment. You can develop a whole solution with it because it is a complete platform. There is a lot of online material that can be used as a reference. You can help yourself while developing a solution. There are some prebuilt applications in the platform environment. You can very easily customize and integrate these applications. It also has flexible scaling of machine resources, which is really great."

"The reporting part has been very valuable as the capabilities of the tool do not have to change graphs, change how grids are displayed, and can create reports on the fly."

More Board pros

"Oracle HFM is excellent for consolidation and reconciliation; it helps me see the general overview of the business across several locations."

"Oracle HFM's drill-through reporting has enhanced my customers' financial analysis significantly, allowing users to drill down to the base level in each of the dimensions and even further using Smart View for very granular level of general ledger cost centers, making the whole process more effective for their targets and deadlines."

"The most valuable feature is the flexibility and ease of configuration in terms of testing and formula creation."

"The tool is stable."

"Financial consolidation and reporting tool with good built-in features such as currency exchange and elimination."

"There are measurable benefits from using Oracle HFM as it reduces manpower and eliminates work duplication."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It is a very user-friendly software."

More Oracle HFM pros

Cons

"We are looking at ways to improve how we deal with security in BOARD and other similar things. "

"The initial setup was very complex for us."

"I would like an eLearning platform for BOARD."

"I would like to see a better Web client, where the controls work the same way as in the Windows client. I do think that the focus is now on the Web, so it should be improved upon."

"The one thing that I think we would like to see in terms of improvement of the application is the ability to print. It's fantastic to have all of these graphic visualization of data, but we're not able to very easily just print... From my perspective, if you can have a little "print" button and then you just click it and it would produce what's on the screen, that would be very helpful."

"It can have more functionality for narrative reporting. They should also improve their training courses, which are currently very lightweight. When you get into more complex things, it is quite difficult to figure out what you're supposed to do, and you have to look at a lot of videos before you actually understand, which is a bit frustrating. Their training can be more comprehensive."

"The setup was a bit complex."

"One thing that I personally would like to see is additional visualization tools for visuals."

More Board cons

"The solution has integration challenges. We need a simple tool that is fool-proof for the data that is submitted not only for consolidation purposes but also for performance management and reporting purposes."

"It's a difficult process to try to edit, configure, or change the business rules that exist and work within HFM."

"In my first experience with Oracle HFM, navigating to input numbers was cumbersome."

"In terms of improvement, one challenge with Oracle HFM is the need for technical knowledge in writing SQL syntax for custom extensions."

"The intercompany reporting function in this tool needs improvement, particularly being able to run reports in batches, rather than one at a time."

"If there could be data integration between HFM and the accounting software that would be ideal."

"Improvements can be made by possibly different interfaces to modernize it, more automation in scripting, and better integration with third-party solutions and reporting capabilities."

"Oracle HFM could be improved or enhanced in handling metadata or the dimensionality."

More Oracle HFM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."

"In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."

"The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."

"The tool's price is a bit high compared to other solutions."

"It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."

"Oracle Hyperion Financial Management (HFM) uses the named user licensing model. There's different pricing depending on HFM and Essbase planning."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Is Board better than Anaplan as a Business Intelligence (BI) solution?

We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and simu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Board?

All the reports are prepared automatically.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Board?

Board's integration could be a bit more robust, but what we have works. If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle HFM?

It depends on the discount offered by Oracle. It is an expensive product but delivers what it promises, ensuring regulatory compliance, reducing risks associated with spreadsheets, and providing a ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle HFM?

Oracle HFM could be improved or enhanced in handling metadata or the dimensionality. I currently handle updates in the dimension hierarchies and properties manually. There is a way for it to be cen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle HFM?

The usual use cases for Oracle HFM that I support are for financial institutions, crewing for ships, and an Australian airlines company. They use the application mainly for management reporting pur...

See all answers

Comparisons

Anaplan vs Board

Compared 22% of the time

Pigment vs Board

Compared 9% of the time

Jedox vs Board

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Board

Compared 7% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Board

Compared 6% of the time

More Board Competitors

CCH Tagetik vs Oracle HFM

Compared 23% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs Oracle HFM

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Oracle HFM

Compared 9% of the time

OneStream XF vs Oracle HFM

Compared 8% of the time

Anaplan vs Oracle HFM

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle HFM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Board

December 2025

Download Board product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle HFM

December 2025

Download Oracle HFM product report

Also Known As

No data available

HFM

Overview

BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

Board International

Oracle Hyperion Financial Management is a financial consolidation and reporting application built with advanced Web technology. It provides financial managers the ability to rapidly consolidate and report financial results, meet global regulatory requirements, reduce the cost of compliance and deliver confidence in the numbers.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB

B&B Hotels, Goldwind, Drake & Scull

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Oracle HFM

December 2025

Free Report: Board vs. Oracle HFM

Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. Oracle HFM and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Board vs. Oracle HFM report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.