BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

BMC Helix and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. BMC Helix is ranked #44, while Broadcom is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0. BMC Helix holds a 0.9% mindshare in CM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

734 Views
360 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 10 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

1,574 Views
913 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are competitors in the cloud management sector. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth appears to have an advantage due to its comprehensive features and strong analytical capabilities.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management provides efficient provisioning, policy-driven management, and robust lifecycle control. It ensures consistency across environments like Azure, AWS, or on-premise. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth offers extensive monitoring, optimization, and comprehensive multi-cloud cost management. The platforms support managing Java EE applications and infrastructure, and they provide valuable insights for enhancing operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could improve in areas such as deeper reporting capabilities, broader third-party integrations, and more advanced analytics features. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth could benefit from simplified deployment processes, improved responsiveness of customer support, and enhancements in cross-platform compatibility features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, while requiring a more intricate setup, compensates with advanced analytical features and strong integration support, which can be advantageous for enterprises focused on long-term benefits.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management attracts cost-conscious organizations with its lower initial setup costs and simpler pricing structure, leading to a quicker ROI. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, necessitating a higher upfront investment, promises potentially greater long-term ROI owing to its proactive cost management capabilities and advanced features, geared towards maximizing cloud investment over time.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Management

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (48th)

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Management

22nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 1.7%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth	1.7%
BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management	0.9%
Other	97.4%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Cláudio Braga

AI Software Developer Engineer at IBM

Improves cloud cost control and accountability but could explore further enhancements

The most valuable features of this solution include the drive for accountability because we can allocate cloud costs back to specific business units or teams through showback and chargeback. Additionally, reduced waste is achieved because we can identify unused or underutilized resources and receive recommendations for resizing instances. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's unified dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by unifying everything needed in one dashboard, such as metrics, instance workings, machines, and servers. All of this in just one dashboard is very helpful to improve agility and resolve issues, especially for the workloads. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth helps manage compliance risks by preventing threats, stopping attacks, detecting threats, and securing workloads or endpoints where customers will be using the endpoints. The positive impact on my organization is substantial because we can reduce waste, optimize expenses, drive accountability, and secure the budget from unnecessary cloud costs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations"

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"The pricing is rather competitive right now."

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

"The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds."

"We use dashboards quite heavily, but one of the features that have really stood out is some of the policies we've created to alert us of particular situations."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's unified dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by unifying everything needed in one dashboard, such as metrics, instance workings, machines, and servers."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"Some companies may not be capable of affording this product."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office."

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"I would like to see better integration from CloudHealth to create easier setup and implementation."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

I do not see any flaws in VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. Everything is fine for me. The performance is acceptable, and the layout is acceptable. It is very user-friendly, and there is nothing that needs...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudHealth?

This product was used for financial management in my company because I was working for a FinTech. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's use case is related to financial control and resource governance across ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudHealth?

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's analytics in understanding cloud usage trends and expense forecasts is normally more for marketing staff and analyzing production servers in my case, so I am not very exp...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 19% of the time

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 15% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 15% of the time

CloudSphere vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 10% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 11% of the time

Yuki Snowflake Optimization Platform vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 7% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

January 2026

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC Helix

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, formerly known as VMware Aria Cost Powered by CloudHealth, is a specialized cloud management platform tailored for Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization. It offers comprehensive visibility into cloud spending across various providers, enabling users to identify areas for optimization and make informed resource allocation decisions. With features like reserved instance management, resource rightsizing, and automated cost governance policies, it facilitates financial management for optimal cost efficiency. Beyond cost optimization, Tanzu CloudHealth enhances cloud operations through workload optimization and governance automation, catering to multi-cloud environments encompassing public, private, and hybrid clouds. Its primary focus remains on enabling organizations to effectively manage and reduce cloud expenditures while supporting operations across diverse cloud platforms.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

December 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.