BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

BMC and VMware are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. BMC is ranked #39, while VMware is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. BMC holds a 0.8% mindshare in CM, compared to VMware’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

259 Views
122 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 9 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

896 Views
311 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are competitors in the cloud management sector. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth appears to have an advantage due to its comprehensive features and strong analytical capabilities.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management provides efficient provisioning, policy-driven management, and robust lifecycle control. It ensures consistency across environments like Azure, AWS, or on-premise. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth offers extensive monitoring, optimization, and comprehensive multi-cloud cost management. The platforms support managing Java EE applications and infrastructure, and they provide valuable insights for enhancing operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could improve in areas such as deeper reporting capabilities, broader third-party integrations, and more advanced analytics features. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth could benefit from simplified deployment processes, improved responsiveness of customer support, and enhancements in cross-platform compatibility features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, while requiring a more intricate setup, compensates with advanced analytical features and strong integration support, which can be advantageous for enterprises focused on long-term benefits.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management attracts cost-conscious organizations with its lower initial setup costs and simpler pricing structure, leading to a quicker ROI. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, necessitating a higher upfront investment, promises potentially greater long-term ROI owing to its proactive cost management capabilities and advanced features, geared towards maximizing cloud investment over time.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Management

39th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (45th)

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Management

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 2.0%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Steve Staten

Cloud Advisor Specialist at Converge Technology Solutions Corp

The solution has excellent scalability, great dashboards, and is stable

I use the solution daily, multiple hours a day to identify possible savings by analyzing the various displays as well as the policies for possible cost savings for our customers CloudHelth has helped our organization with trying to right-size virtual machines based on current utilization and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"The solution is useful for cloud transparency and visibility in reports and dashboards that I have generated, especially the pre-populated dashboards."

"We use dashboards quite heavily, but one of the features that have really stood out is some of the policies we've created to alert us of particular situations."

"The pricing is rather competitive right now."

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds."

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

"If you are working with the OS you need help and other connectors to get more information."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office."

"I would like to see better integration from CloudHealth to create easier setup and implementation."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

20%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about CloudHealth?

The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

There could be flexibility in pricing for the product. They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size. It will help us get the right cost. Ad...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudHealth?

I rate VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 61% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 39% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 19% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

June 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2025

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, formerly known as VMware Aria Cost Powered by CloudHealth, is a specialized cloud management platform tailored for Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization. It offers comprehensive visibility into cloud spending across various providers, enabling users to identify areas for optimization and make informed resource allocation decisions. With features like reserved instance management, resource rightsizing, and automated cost governance policies, it facilitates financial management for optimal cost efficiency. Beyond cost optimization, Tanzu CloudHealth enhances cloud operations through workload optimization and governance automation, catering to multi-cloud environments encompassing public, private, and hybrid clouds. Its primary focus remains on enabling organizations to effectively manage and reduce cloud expenditures while supporting operations across diverse cloud platforms.

VMware

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.