Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

BlackBerry and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #72, while WatchGuard is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8. BlackBerry holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Blackberry Dynamics Apps and WatchGuard EPDR are both prominent solutions in their respective domains. Users are happier with the pricing and support of Blackberry Dynamics Apps. However, WatchGuard EPDR is favored for its advanced features, making it worth the price.

Features: Blackberry Dynamics Apps are praised for their robust security features, integration capabilities, and responsive customer service. WatchGuard EPDR stands out for its comprehensive endpoint protection, detection capabilities, and in-depth technical support. Users find WatchGuard EPDR's feature set more extensive and advantageous for protecting enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Blackberry Dynamics Apps could improve by enhancing performance speed, expanding compatibility with different devices, and offering more detailed reporting features. WatchGuard EPDR users highlight the need for a more intuitive configuration process, better user interface, and more detailed reporting features. WatchGuard EPDR appears more focused on evolving its feature set based on user feedback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Blackberry Dynamics Apps have a straightforward deployment model, with users noting the responsive customer service. WatchGuard EPDR's deployment is also seen as efficient, though some users find it somewhat more complex. WatchGuard EPDR's customer service is known for its in-depth technical support, giving it a slight edge in user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Blackberry Dynamics Apps are considered cost-effective, with a favorable return on investment noted by users. WatchGuard EPDR, while more expensive, is deemed worth the price due to its extensive features, providing a strong ROI through its comprehensive protection and detection capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. WatchGuard EPDR

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,813 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Blackberry Dynamics Apps is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
WatchGuard EPDR	1.8%
Blackberry Dynamics Apps	0.4%
Other	94.4%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Sukkanta Banerjee

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

A way for users to manage their credentials on the go using a stable, and scalable app

I give the solution an eight out of ten. It's hard to comment on the number of users because the feature is completely for corporate employees who have Blackberry devices, so it's hard to track how many users there are. I advise making your decision to use the solution based on the usage in the company or the demand of the business, which you are running based on the demand.

Read full review

Norlia Jalani

Section Head, Information Technology at a transportation company with 201-500 employees

Using cloud-based console for software inventory management and email alerts

I have no idea if I use some automation functions. I can't find any disadvantages; maybe that is because many companies haven't used it. I would prefer to see some features such as AI in antivirus solutions. I appreciate reporting, but it could be better with monthly reporting or auto-generated monthly reports.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cortex is the best tool for endpoint detection, and I have used it to verify hashes or domains to identify malicious activity, trigger playbooks that automate and gather endpoint logs, block malicious processes, and update incident tickets, showcasing end-to-end processes with automation in investigation and reducing the analysis workflow."

"The ability to kind of stitch everything together and see the actual complete picture is very useful. I guess you'd call it a playbook. Some people call it the forensics analysis of what was happening on particular endpoints when they detected some malicious behavior, and what transpired before that to cause that. It is also very user friendly. The way they have done everything and integrated all the solutions that they've purchased over the years to make it a very seamless, effective product is very good. One thing about Palo Alto is that they take the products or services that they purchase and make them seamless for the end user as compared to some companies that purchase other companies and then just kind of have their products off to the side or keep different interfaces. Palo Alto doesn't do that."

"The live terminal is probably the best thing ever. It gives you the access to get straight onto any machine."

"The positive impacts I see from Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks include a complete 360-degree view of our security posture altogether, being a uniform platform where we are ingesting logs from multiple resources."

"From a single pane of glass, you can easily manage all of your endpoints."

"The most valuable features are the fact that it was running in the background and it would intercept any weird stuff, and the fact that it would send things directly to the cloud for sandboxing. It's quite practical."

"Palo Alto is the core of the security infrastructure in the environment."

"If any application performs suspicious activities, such as changing registries or modifying other applications, Cortex XDR detects and blocks the entire application."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"The mail is without a doubt the most valuable."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily."

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"It is easy to manage."

"WatchGuard is commendable for its work on threats."

"Their remote management (RMM) is very good."

"Adaptive Defense is pretty easy to use, and Panda support is excellent."

"What is really great about Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is its console in the cloud, and it can keep the inventory of software in the PC."

"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."

More WatchGuard EPDR pros

Cons

"The main issue I could point out is the offline agents and the way that it is missing."

"Currently, we are monitoring all USB drives and ports but we would like to improve our device control capabilities."

"They are charging for Network Traffic Analyzer (NTA) services, so if the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"It automatically detects security issues. It should be able to protect our network devices while operating autonomously."

"There are some third-party solutions that are difficult to integrate with, which is something that can be improved."

"If you compare it to SentinelOne, which has more functionalities and detection capabilities on an open platform, the pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can improve mobile integration to allow access to the console."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The user interface could be improved. It was clunky at times."

"The solution can be improved by adding more features in which the content could be synced."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense’s stability could be improved."

"An area for improvement would be the software deployment to seamlessly deploy software packages across multiple machines simultaneously, and to enhance the remote monitoring capabilities."

"The implementation was difficult."

"The product is available at a very high price, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Occasionally, we suffer from little bugs that give us the wrong message."

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive."

"Only the DNS filtering part could be improved, and nothing else apart from this needs correction."

"The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard."

More WatchGuard EPDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"The price of the product is not very economical."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"We had a licensing package of $500,000 for three years."

"I am not able to remember the amount, but users have to subscribe for a certain amount, so once they subscribe, the amount gets sent."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"The price is excellent."

"The solution's pricing is better compared to other products."

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Hospitality Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	47

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

The price of the solution is okay. It's all right.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I would not be able to say what areas of WatchGuard EPDR have improved, as I do not work with the product myself so m...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Compared 47% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Compared 33% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Compared 20% of the time

More Blackberry Dynamics Apps Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 9% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 3% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

February 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2026

Download Blackberry Dynamics Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

January 2026

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

BLACKBERRY DYNAMICS PLATFORM
THE FOUNDATION FOR POWERFUL AND SECURE MOBILE APPS
Built for the most demanding businesses and delivering high availability, disaster recovery and industry-leading scalability, BlackBerry® Dynamics offers an advanced, mature and tested container for mobile apps.

BlackBerry

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. WatchGuard EPDR

February 2026

Free Report: Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.