We performed a comparison between BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe and Symantec Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A sophisticated and mature solution."
"The most valuable features of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe are the ease of use and the API is very nice. Additionally, the interface is very good between AD and Unix."
"DevOps Secrets Safe allows you to customize a lot of rules."
"The local administrator can manage all the user's logins in one, simple, straight-away account access. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly."
"We have received good support from the tech support team."
"Transparent login for users of privileged IDs (Linux, Windows). This prevents sharing of the password because it is never seen."
"It will provide us with more security."
"We can check the activities in the server for fragile files and documents in case of any issues."
"Comprehensive coverage of the required features for the PAM solution."
"Password Management and Session Recording. The simplicity and ease that it is to be up and running out-of-the-box is very much appreciated."
"It reduces the viral attacks on my website. It also allows certain users access to see what happens daily."
"It is great for identity governance."
"The product contains some bugs."
"You need to improvise many of the customized rules, which can lead to some errors. BeyondTrust should reduce the error rate."
"We had some issues with the solution and once we contacted support they eventually solved the problem. They could improve their response time."
"The support for the solution is not very good, they could improve by being quicker."
"We have to do a lot of manual work to automate features."
"What I hope happens with the new product CA PAM is to keep all the useful features that exist in PA, but what I’ve noticed with many new products is the UI gets polished but systems lags stability and performance or it adds additional complexity instead of simplifying the user experience."
"It's difficult to locate the reports, there are limits on what reports can be run from the GUI, and the report formats are lacking."
"We experience stability issues after every patch upgrade. This is a place where CA needs to improve drastically."
"I’m no fan of Java as an application front-end, as it tends to have issues depending on what browser one’s using."
"They should include some assignments in the test environment to explore the product's features."
"The management console could be improved."
"An improvement for this solution is that it should not be constantly based on user name and password. There should be a condition to edit and update your username."
More BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Symantec Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is ranked 19th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 4 reviews while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is ranked 18th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 50 reviews. BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is rated 7.6, while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe writes "Integrates well between AD and Unix, scalable, and easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Privileged Access Manager writes "Allows IT and consultants to access the infrastructure environment but needs more security and better support". BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, BeyondTrust Password Safe, Delinea Secret Server and Azure Key Vault, whereas Symantec Privileged Access Manager is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Delinea Secret Server and ARCON Privileged Access Management. See our BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
