Azure Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Wallarm NG WAF and Azure Web Application Firewall are competing security solutions designed to protect web applications. Azure Web Application Firewall seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features, making it a preferred choice despite pricing concerns.

Features: Wallarm NG WAF utilizes active threat detection and adaptive security rules, which minimize unnecessary events and confirm actual vulnerabilities. Its deployment simplicity and machine learning techniques significantly reduce false-positive alerts. Azure Web Application Firewall excels in request filtering using custom rules, OWASP rule set for blocking false positives, and seamless integration within the Azure ecosystem, providing extensive control to application teams.

Room for Improvement: Wallarm NG WAF could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities within cloud environments and expanded analytical tools. Improvements in scalability features and reduction of tedium in manual oversight are also desirable. Azure Web Application Firewall may require enhancements in cross-cloud compatibility and user interface, and broader analytics features to provide more actionable insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF offers an efficient deployment process with flexible configuration and strong support services. Azure Web Application Firewall, being part of the Azure ecosystem, provides straightforward integration, especially valuable for existing Azure users, and is supported by Microsoft's extensive customer service network.

Pricing and ROI: Wallarm NG WAF offers competitive pricing that leads to strong ROI, attributed to its efficient threat detection capabilities. Azure Web Application Firewall, though potentially more expensive initially, justifies the cost with deep integration and long-term savings potential within an Azure-centric infrastructure. Both solutions aim for effective cost management through their specialized features.