Azure Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Microsoft and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.5, while Wallarm is ranked #38. Microsoft holds a 4.4% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Azure Web Application Firewall

Read 13 Azure Web Application Firewall reviews

3,216 Views
2,177 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

353 Views
175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Web Application Firewall

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Wallarm NG WAF and Azure Web Application Firewall are competing security solutions designed to protect web applications. Azure Web Application Firewall seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features, making it a preferred choice despite pricing concerns.

Features: Wallarm NG WAF utilizes active threat detection and adaptive security rules, which minimize unnecessary events and confirm actual vulnerabilities. Its deployment simplicity and machine learning techniques significantly reduce false-positive alerts. Azure Web Application Firewall excels in request filtering using custom rules, OWASP rule set for blocking false positives, and seamless integration within the Azure ecosystem, providing extensive control to application teams.

Room for Improvement: Wallarm NG WAF could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities within cloud environments and expanded analytical tools. Improvements in scalability features and reduction of tedium in manual oversight are also desirable. Azure Web Application Firewall may require enhancements in cross-cloud compatibility and user interface, and broader analytics features to provide more actionable insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF offers an efficient deployment process with flexible configuration and strong support services. Azure Web Application Firewall, being part of the Azure ecosystem, provides straightforward integration, especially valuable for existing Azure users, and is supported by Microsoft's extensive customer service network.

Pricing and ROI: Wallarm NG WAF offers competitive pricing that leads to strong ROI, attributed to its efficient threat detection capabilities. Azure Web Application Firewall, though potentially more expensive initially, justifies the cost with deep integration and long-term savings potential within an Azure-centric infrastructure. Both solutions aim for effective cost management through their specialized features.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Wallarm NG WAF

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Web Application Firewall

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (20th)

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

38th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Azure Web Application Firewall is 4.4%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Mano Senaratne

Management Consultant at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Comprehensive suite simplifies configuration while frequent updates require management

Mainly, it comes with the complete suite of Microsoft services. I can use it in conjunction with the best options and other features that come with it. Configuration is much easier than using different platforms. For example, if I have hosted the application in AWS and am using the Application Firewall from Azure, there are certain additional steps to follow when configuring them. With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan. Azure continually upgrades platforms and sends us messages to upgrade to the next version, simplifying the process. Later, it's much easier if I want to upgrade the software platform, scale it, or move it to a different application host as the whole suite comes together. The return on investment is good. If I am doing applications for clients, I can invoice them for better costs. Most applications that I run and use have a better return on investment.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Configuration is much easier than using different platforms."

"The initial setup is easy and straightforward...Azure Web Application Firewall is a scalable product."

"It's great for protecting against DDoS attacks."

"The integration it has with GitHub is great."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Web Application Firewall is its ability to filter requests and block false positives by using custom rules and the OWASP rule set."

"The most valuable feature is that it allows us to publish our applications behind the firewall."

"The solution has good dashboards."

"The return on investment is good."

More Azure Web Application Firewall pros

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

Cons

"Upgrading the platform regularly is necessary for security, however, frequent updates every six months or year from Azure can be a maintenance overhead."

"The knowledge base could be improved."

"I would say that Azure's customer service is not that good...I am not very happy with the support offered."

"There is a need to be able to configure the solution more."

"The documentation needs to be improved."

"Deployment should be simplified so that a non-techie can handle it."

"From my point of view, there is no need for improvement."

"From a reporting perspective, they could do more there."

More Azure Web Application Firewall cons

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure WAF has price advantages over other WAF solutions. The pricing model is flexible because you pay on a scale based on the level of protection you need."

"I give the pricing a nine out of ten."

"The price of the solution depends on your architecture and how you manage it. You can control the cost in Azure quite well. The costs do not directly correlate to expenses in the features we are using."

"The price is reasonable. It is approximately $2,000 US per month."

"We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft and the pricing is good."

"The price is for this solution is fair and there is a license needed."

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Insurance Company

14%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Web Application Firewall?

The integration it has with GitHub is great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Web Application Firewall?

The pricing is okay at the moment. Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements. A higher SKU application hosting platform adds to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Web Application Firewall?

While using it, I identified certain areas where it would have been good to have additional features. Right now, I can't recall any specific instances. Seamless integration is good, yet having mult...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS WAF vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 33% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 4% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Web Application Firewall Competitors

Akamai API Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 25% of the time

Fastly vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 17% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Cequence Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Web Application Firewall

June 2025

Download Azure Web Application Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

June 2025

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Wallarm NG WAF is utilized to protect against web application threats, enhance security policies, and ensure consistent application security. It provides real-time attack prevention, detailed threat analytics, and automated incident response, making it suitable for both small and large-scale environments.

Wallarm NG WAF offers comprehensive API protection and adaptive security measures integrated with DevOps workflows. It efficiently detects and blocks attacks using AI-driven detection algorithms and provides thorough coverage against OWASP Top 10 threats. Users benefit from its easy deployment, scalability, and user-friendly configuration. Detailed analytics and robust performance in diverse environments make it a reliable option. However, users suggest improvements in documentation, customer support, update frequency, initial configuration process, and better integration capabilities to enhance the overall experience.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

Real-time attack prevention: Offers immediate protection against web application threats.
AI-driven detection algorithms: Efficiently identifies and blocks malicious activities.
DevOps integration: Seamlessly integrates with DevOps tools and workflows.
OWASP Top 10 coverage: Provides comprehensive protection against top security risks.
Detailed analytics: Delivers in-depth threat analysis for better security management.
Scalability: Suitable for both small and large-scale environments.
Easy deployment: Quick and simple setup process for immediate use.

What benefits should you look for in Wallarm NG WAF reviews?

Enhanced security policies: Strengthens overall application security.
Consistent application security: Ensures uniform protection across all applications.
Automated incident response: Reduces manual intervention during security events.
Comprehensive API protection: Safeguards all API interactions effectively.
Adaptive security measures: Adjusts defenses based on emerging threats.
User-friendly configuration: Simplifies initial setup and ongoing management.
Robust performance: Maintains high security standards in various environments.

Wallarm NG WAF is implemented across different industries, including finance, healthcare, and e-commerce. It addresses their unique security needs by providing adaptive protections, detailed threat analytics, and integration capabilities. The scalability and ease of deployment make it an ideal choice for organizations managing large-scale applications and APIs.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Wallarm NG WAF

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.