Azure Web Application Firewall vs Uplynk comparison

Microsoft and Uplynk are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.5, while Uplynk is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.8. Microsoft holds a 4.4% mindshare in WAF, compared to Uplynk’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

Azure Web Application Firewall

Read 13 Azure Web Application Firewall reviews

3,216 Views
2,177 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Uplynk

Read 6 Uplynk reviews

467 Views
67 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Web Application Firewall

Uplynk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 5, 2025

Uplynk and Azure Web Application Firewall compete in the tech security landscape. Uplynk has an edge in competitive pricing and support, while Azure Web Application Firewall stands out with an extensive range of features appealing to enterprises seeking robust cybersecurity solutions.

Features: Uplynk offers robust encryption standards, easy integration for streaming services, and an intuitive interface for media delivery. Azure Web Application Firewall provides advanced threat protection, seamless integration with Microsoft Azure, and customizable security configurations, making it ideal for enterprises requiring extensive coverage.

Room for Improvement: Uplynk could benefit from enhancing reporting capabilities, scaling its encryption methodologies for larger enterprises, and expanding support for more media formats. Azure Web Application Firewall might improve by simplifying its configuration process, increasing documentation clarity, and reducing complexity in rule management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Uplynk ensures a straightforward deployment process with responsive, multimedia-focused support. Azure Web Application Firewall requires a more complex setup due to its extensive nature but provides comprehensive documentation and training resources for large-scale applications.

Pricing and ROI: Uplynk offers a cost-effective solution, delivering quick ROI with streamlined media service delivery. While Azure Web Application Firewall involves higher initial costs, its enhanced security features justify these expenses for organizations focused on long-term cyber defense strategies. Its flexible pricing model, based on protection level, offers scalability benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Web Application Firewall

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (20th)

Uplynk

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (9th), CDN (8th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Azure Web Application Firewall is 4.4%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Mano Senaratne

Management Consultant at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Comprehensive suite simplifies configuration while frequent updates require management

Mainly, it comes with the complete suite of Microsoft services. I can use it in conjunction with the best options and other features that come with it. Configuration is much easier than using different platforms. For example, if I have hosted the application in AWS and am using the Application Firewall from Azure, there are certain additional steps to follow when configuring them. With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan. Azure continually upgrades platforms and sends us messages to upgrade to the next version, simplifying the process. Later, it's much easier if I want to upgrade the software platform, scale it, or move it to a different application host as the whole suite comes together. The return on investment is good. If I am doing applications for clients, I can invoice them for better costs. Most applications that I run and use have a better return on investment.

Read full review

Eduardo Oviedo-Blanco

CTO and Game Developer at Solospace

A CDN solution to enhance loading times and streamline navigation

When one of the primary nodes spanning from North to South America, from the northern US to the southern US, became operational, it had a big impact. It can be challenging to explain its advantages to clients. The technical nature of the marketing material is too technical for stakeholders. Integrating the solution was straightforward, requiring no extra effort. Edgio Global CDN operates, resembling familiar cloud services but offering elevated functionality. Unlike platforms such as Google Cloud Platform or RIN geared towards development teams, Edgio emphasizes client-facing services that are integral to our operations. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Configuration is much easier than using different platforms."

"The most valuable feature is that it allows us to publish our applications behind the firewall."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Web Application Firewall is its ability to filter requests and block false positives by using custom rules and the OWASP rule set."

"The solution has good dashboards."

"It's a good option if you want a solution that's ready to go and easy for your team to learn. It's cloud-based, so you don't need to buy or maintain any hardware infrastructure."

"Azure WAF is extremely stable."

"We have found the most valuable features to be the web application, minimal skills required for management, control through policies, and automation."

"It is almost impossible to access these assets from outside, requiring a very skilled attacker to obtain asset tokens of a customer using Azure."

More Azure Web Application Firewall pros

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

Cons

"The support for proxy forwarding could improve."

"I would say that Azure's customer service is not that good...I am not very happy with the support offered."

"From a reporting perspective, they could do more there."

"The management can be improved."

"Deployment should be simplified so that a non-techie can handle it."

"Azure WAF should not be deployed in the middle of the traffic."

"In Brazil, we have some problems with the phone service that affect our connection with the cloud. However, it isn't common."

"The knowledge base could be improved."

More Azure Web Application Firewall cons

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution depends on your architecture and how you manage it. You can control the cost in Azure quite well. The costs do not directly correlate to expenses in the features we are using."

"We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft and the pricing is good."

"The price is reasonable. It is approximately $2,000 US per month."

"The price is for this solution is fair and there is a license needed."

"Azure WAF has price advantages over other WAF solutions. The pricing model is flexible because you pay on a scale based on the level of protection you need."

"I give the pricing a nine out of ten."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Web Application Firewall?

The integration it has with GitHub is great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Web Application Firewall?

The pricing is okay at the moment. Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements. A higher SKU application hosting platform adds to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Web Application Firewall?

While using it, I identified certain areas where it would have been good to have additional features. Right now, I can't recall any specific instances. Seamless integration is good, yet having mult...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more affordable and now offers reasonable pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. By writing comprehensive tests and leveraging Expo's capabilities, I ensured cons...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal software engineer, and one of my responsibilities was leading mobile app development. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS WAF vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 33% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 4% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Web Application Firewall Competitors

Azure Front Door vs Uplynk

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 17% of the time

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 15% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 14% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Web Application Firewall

June 2025

Download Azure Web Application Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

June 2025

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.