Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Azure Site Recovery, while being pricier than some providers, has a sufficient service level to justify costs.
Azure Site Recovery is time-saving, and its features allow us to automate processes and save resources.
During a global outage that affected our operations, there was no apology or in-depth follow-up from Microsoft.
Microsoft support could be improved as it rates only a five out of ten, with slow response times and a preference for email over phone communication even in severity B cases.
Issues frequently require escalation.
Scalability is provided because they are offering 99.95% availability.
I would rate the scalability of Azure Site Recovery as a nine out of ten.
For scalability, it is fine and easy to set up.
The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations.
I would rate the stability of Azure Site Recovery at eight to nine out of ten.
If their agent version is mismatched and the health status is critical, you will not be able to perform your Azure Site Recovery.
There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages.
there weren't any significant problems with Azure Site Recovery.
It was not the expensive part of our costs.
A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site.
The pricing of Azure Site Recovery is around a four out of ten, being somewhat cost-effective.
In Azure, we can access the services remotely, and we can do DR drills or these other things with minimal cost and resource allocation.
Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.
Azure provides a 99.99% SLA for their uptime, ensuring that even during outages due to patch releases, there is no data loss, merely hindered accessibility.
Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.
N2W provides a cloud-native platform for AWS and Azure environments, delivering rapid and secure backup and recovery. With its simplicity and efficiency, N2W addresses modern IT needs for managing diverse workloads.
N2W empowers IT teams with a platform built for real-world AWS and Azure demands. It allows effortless scaling, managing workloads ranging from a single app to thousands. Offering policy-based backups, it ensures rapid recovery, achieving operations under 60 seconds. Its features include ransomware protection, smart data management, seamless low-cost archival, and comprehensive reporting. Trusted by over 1,000 diverse organizations, N2W simplifies protection and reduces complexity.
What features make N2W stand out?N2W serves a range of industries by backing up EC2 instances, RDS, virtual machines, and applications like SQL. It supports disaster recovery through automated backup scheduling and integrates cloud repositories for added security. Often used with Veeam, N2W provides an offsite copy for redundancy.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
