Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs Heroku comparison

Read 29 Heroku reviews

2,361 Views
1,712 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Heroku and Azure Red Hat OpenShift are competing in the platform-as-a-service market. Heroku stands out for its ease of use and cost-effectiveness, while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is preferred for its robust feature set catering to large enterprises.

Features: Heroku provides automated app deployments, integrated add-ons, and continuous integration, ideal for small teams or individual developers. Conversely, Azure Red Hat OpenShift offers advanced orchestration with Kubernetes, robust integration and scalability options, suitable for complex enterprise applications.

Room for Improvement: Heroku could improve on providing more advanced features and better support for complex orchestration needs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift could reduce its complexity and provide more cost-effective solutions and a steeper learning curve for new users, making it less intimidating for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Heroku's deployment is simple and efficient, making it a great choice for rapid iteration cycles, backed by accessible support resources. Azure Red Hat OpenShift follows a more intricate setup, designed for managing large-scale operations with enhanced technical support aimed at enterprise clients.

Pricing and ROI: Heroku offers a straightforward pricing model, which appeals to startups and small-scale developers, offering good ROI for simpler applications. Azure Red Hat OpenShift involves higher initial costs but justifies the investment for organizations through extensive features and its ability to scale, offering greater ROI for enterprises with complex needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Heroku Report (Updated: April 2025).

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Heroku

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Heroku

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Heroku is 3.0%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

John Sanborn

Sr manager cloud engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Runs on every platform; makes it easy to adapt to Kubernetes

One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive. Another thing is that OpenShift has its own CLI, it has features in it that you don't have under normal Kubernetes. So if you're just a plain Kubernetes developer, you either don't know about these other features and you don't take advantage of them so you're basically treating it like a normal Kubernetes or there's a slight learning curve as you start to learn how the new CLIs work, the other options that are not available in Kubernetes. There is a learning curve; it's not high, but it's still there. That's another negative against OpenShift. If you're purchasing OpenShift on their OpenShift container platform, you will have to manage the master nodes. If you are using Kubernetes in AWS, Google, and Azure, you don't manage master nodes. It's not really a big deal. It's all part of the patching in OpenShift. People will start to say, "Well, I don't want to manage the masters." But I think if they actually see the process of patching an OpenShift, they would say, "Okay, it's not even worth arguing because it's so simple." Alternatively, the main three cloud vendors can provide OpenShift as a service.

Read full review

Faizan Haider

Senior Software Engineer at Aldaim Solutions

Used for server deployment and provides auto maintenance of databases

Heroku is deployed on the cloud. We can deploy our private and public projects over at Heroku. Most of the time, when we are starting any new project from scratch, we have to implement our MVP for that project or the core idea. We are unsure how our traffic flow will go or the actual production environment requirements. We don't want to spend the most on the server sites, so then we can use it with our go-to plan for Heroku, and all the resources are available in the basic plan with the minimum expenses. So, it helps us to deploy and make our features available online at the minimum cost. Once we know our needs, we can add the professional add-ons and shift it to another platform. Heroku supports any resource listed in the marketplace. We just have to deploy our AI solutions, and Heroku can also support AI projects. I would recommend the solution to other users. I advise users not to purchase extra add-ons but to make scalable resources so that they can use all the resources efficiently. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

"We use Heroku to run generic data. We also use it for our customer development environment. It helps us to build and test websites."

"The platform is very Node.js-friendly, which is something that is important to us."

"Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS."

"One of the best things about Heroku is that it is very easy and straightforward to deploy an application."

"I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards."

"It is easy to deploy applications, and we don't need to bother about software updates on the server. We don't need to bother about machines, servers, and hardware. We only need to care about the system and functionality that we need or want to develop. They take care of everything else. It provides high availability. It is a pretty good solution that provides everything that we need. It has everything that we need to run our applications. We have many different applications, and we generate three million bills for a company in Brazil. We see more than a billion requests per day in another application. Everything works just fine, and it is very good."

"What I found most valuable about this solution is that it's easy to use and integrate with GitHub actions."

"It's easy to push a change and to deploy new things."

More Heroku pros

Cons

"Automation could be improved."

"The product is expensive."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."

"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

"The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly."

"We don't find the pipelines intuitive. The user experience could be better. Having to set up multiple apps, then a pipeline, seems like an overkill on the amount of work to do."

"The tool's configuration is complex."

"Heroku should increase its slug size limits."

"We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

"Heroku had an authentication problem a few months ago, but they solved it."

"I think this solution would be improved if free demos were available indefinitely."

"I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances."

More Heroku cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"Its price is very good."

"The tool is free."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Government

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

Red Hat OpenShift is cheaper than Broadcom VMware. Pricing discussions typically follow considerations of functionality, efficiency, and strategy.

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix.

What do you like most about Heroku?

I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards.

What needs improvement with Heroku?

I don't like that the web server crashes every day, every 24 hours. The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly. The Docker features are not great. You cannot use any ...

What is your primary use case for Heroku?

We use the solution for web applications and web APIs.

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Comparisons

Compared 61% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 24% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 15% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Heroku

Compared 29% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Heroku

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Heroku

Compared 10% of the time

Google App Engine vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Heroku

Compared 6% of the time

More Heroku Competitors

Product Reports

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Download Heroku product report

Overview

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. Kubernetes is at the core of Red Hat OpenShift. OpenShift brings added-value features to complement Kubernetes, making it a turnkey container platform as a service (PaaS) with a significantly improved developer and operator experience.

Microsoft

Established in 2007, Heroku is a cloud application platform providing a streamlined, efficient place for web app developers to create and deploy their applications. Heroku is designed to maximize developer productivity. With the entire web application development process available on the Herokucloud, creating and rolling out web apps has been made more efficient, convenient, and cost-effective than ever before.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Heroku