Azure NetApp Files vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

NetApp and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. NetApp is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.3, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7. NetApp holds a 7.6% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Azure NetApp Files

Read 17 Azure NetApp Files reviews

2,365 Views
1,514 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Backup Service

Read 11 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews

362 Views
333 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Oracle Database Backup Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Oracle Database Backup Service and Azure NetApp Files compete in the database management and backup category. Azure NetApp Files generally has the upper hand due to better overall features and performance, although Oracle Database Backup Service offers more favorable pricing and support.

Features: Oracle Database Backup Service is praised for its automated backup capabilities, seamless integration with other Oracle products, and cost-effectiveness for Oracle users. Azure NetApp Files is valued for its high performance, scalability, and compatibility with multiple database systems. Users report that Azure NetApp Files offers superior features, particularly in terms of flexibility and performance.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Database Backup Service users often highlight a need for more flexible storage options, better documentation, and enhanced user interface. Azure NetApp Files reviews suggest improvements in cost optimization, more transparent pricing structures, and simplified initial setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Database Backup Service deployment is reported as straightforward by most users, with strong customer support praised for its effectiveness. Azure NetApp Files, while also noted for relatively easy deployment, receives mixed feedback about the complexity of initial setups and varying support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Database Backup Service stands out for its cost-effectiveness and attractive ROI, especially for existing Oracle users who benefit from bundled offerings. Azure NetApp Files, while perceived as more expensive, is considered worth the investment for its high performance and advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (8th), Cloud Storage (9th)

Oracle Database Backup Service

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 7.6%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Backup Service is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure NetApp Files	7.6%
Oracle Database Backup Service	1.3%
Other	91.1%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

AjayKumar13

Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Fast, reliable, and helps meet our SLAs

The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes. It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable. You don't need to take the snapshot. Snapshots are compressed. It doesn't take storage from the back end. It takes three minutes to do sixty terabytes of the database. You don't have to go to the tape and store it outside, which takes hours and hours. It also uses a lot less of the storage. It's very easy to restore or copy the snapshots to other locations for disaster recovery. There are a lot of benefits. In terms of the snapshot's rapid restore capability, we were testing the load of performance testing, and we needed to rebuild the DR site. If I need to rebuild the DR for a standby database, it takes sixty terabytes to copy onto the another site, which will take at least a day. Now, the snapshot is easy. We just copy the snapshots, and then we do the cross-region application. The snapshots came along with that, and that's where we were able to build the DR site within a few hours rather than days. All together, instead of a four-day process, instead of a day.

Read full review

Hosney Osman

Senior Operation Engineer at Vodafone

Achieve high availability and security with automated tasks over a decade

While there are some disadvantages in this product, from my experience with basic use cases, daily tasks, integration, scheduling, saving, and encryption, I have not encountered significant areas for improvement. However, the addition of a GUI configuration management and administration console for all administrative tasks would be highly beneficial. It would be preferable to have the ability to perform all console, terminal, and command line operations through a GUI interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has saved a lot of time. Because in the older, conventional hardware system, they need to raise a ticket to go to storage engineering, then storage engineering would increased the size. Now, it's dynamic. You don't have to do anything. This improved the time by more than 50 percent."

"The most valuable features of the solution is replication to another region and the performance. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward."

"It's elastic, so it scales with our demands. We can start small, then with the addition of customer loads, we can expand on-the-fly without the need to reprovision something."

"We use Azure NetApp Files mainly for backup."

"Azure NetApp Files has been stable."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its flexibility."

"Since we have NetApp's internally, we use the SnapMirror predominantly for this process in the cloud which is beneficial."

"The critical features of this solution are SnapMirror for replication, data protection, and SnapLock."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."

"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is stable and offers high availability and the commands for restoration and backup processes are not complicated."

"The interface is good."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."

"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is stable and offers high availability, and the commands for restoration and backup processes are not complicated."

"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."

More Oracle Database Backup Service pros

Cons

"I have a hunch that storage could be now the most expensive portion of our monthly bill. So I can imagine that, not this year, but next year we will be talking about looking deeper into ways how we can optimize the cost."

"Reserved Instances for Azure NetApp Files would improve more use cases, making them more valuable in Azure as the cost would be reduced."

"We would like to see more paired regions for the replication."

"The initial setup was not straightforward. We had help from the NetApp team."

"The deployment process is somewhat complex compared to other storage solutions."

"Azure NetApp Files could improve by being more diverse to integrate better with other solutions, such as Splunk and the on-premise version. There are some use cases that are not covered natively by Azure. It is not the best solution because it is not external from the cloud which for me is the best type of solution."

"The main area for improvement is in the support ticket system. Since it's a SaaS platform, support tickets are managed by Microsoft or NetApp backend. This can sometimes lead to cross-functional challenges for organizations."

"We were looking for a clustered solution that has over-complicated things because we had it in AWS, which is Amazon. There was a solution for clustered NetApp. That meant there would be two NetApps that were not clustered because there was no solution for a cluster. We would like there to be an HA cluster solution."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

"The solution needs to add an archive function."

"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."

"The installation process is easy for me because I have performed this action hundreds of times. However, it is important to note that beginners and even some senior professionals may encounter significant difficulties during installation."

"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."

"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."

"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."

"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."

More Oracle Database Backup Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent."

"NetApp is a premium offering, so it's not a cheap product, but it is well-priced. It combines a couple of properties which customers like us are willing to pay. Could it be cheaper? Yes, but if you combine fully supported, fully managed, easily provisioned, scalable, and quick all in one product, it's a good selling point. You can ask a lot of money for all these. If you have a use case like we do, it's a perfect match. It's like the Porsche of storage solutions in the cloud. It is totally worth the cost."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Our pricing has not been determined because we are still waiting on additional features."

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"This solution is very expensive compared to the alternatives."

"It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage."

"The licensing fees for this solution vary, ranging from a single shelf to a full suite."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

"The platform is expensive."

"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."

"The platform is expensive."

"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."

"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure NetApp Files?

The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database Backup Service?

From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?

Oracle Database Backup Service is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 27% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 8% of the time

Nasuni vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon FSx vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 41% of the time

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 41% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 17% of the time

More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files

October 2025

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database Backup Service

September 2025

Download Oracle Database Backup Service product report

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF

No data available

Overview

Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.

Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.

What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?

Flexibility: Supports diverse applications with robust Active Directory integration.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to increased performance demands.
Fast Snapshotting: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities.
SnapMirror: Provides effective replication features.
SnapLock: Ensures SEC compliance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

High Availability: Delivers reliable performance.
Cost-effective Throughput: Balances performance with expenditure.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data management tasks.
Non-disruptive Resizing: Facilitates seamless storage adjustments.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data effectively.

In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.

NetApp

Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

Oracle

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic

Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

September 2025

Free Report: Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.