Azure NetApp Files vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Why PeerSpot?

NetApp and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. NetApp is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0. NetApp holds a 3.4% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Azure NetApp Files

Read 18 Azure NetApp Files reviews

4,869 Views
2,142 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Backup Service

Read 12 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews

1,903 Views
1,865 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Oracle Database Backup Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Oracle Database Backup Service and Azure NetApp Files compete in the database management and backup category. Azure NetApp Files generally has the upper hand due to better overall features and performance, although Oracle Database Backup Service offers more favorable pricing and support.

Features: Oracle Database Backup Service is praised for its automated backup capabilities, seamless integration with other Oracle products, and cost-effectiveness for Oracle users. Azure NetApp Files is valued for its high performance, scalability, and compatibility with multiple database systems. Users report that Azure NetApp Files offers superior features, particularly in terms of flexibility and performance.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Database Backup Service users often highlight a need for more flexible storage options, better documentation, and enhanced user interface. Azure NetApp Files reviews suggest improvements in cost optimization, more transparent pricing structures, and simplified initial setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Database Backup Service deployment is reported as straightforward by most users, with strong customer support praised for its effectiveness. Azure NetApp Files, while also noted for relatively easy deployment, receives mixed feedback about the complexity of initial setups and varying support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Database Backup Service stands out for its cost-effectiveness and attractive ROI, especially for existing Oracle users who benefit from bundled offerings. Azure NetApp Files, while perceived as more expensive, is considered worth the investment for its high performance and advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (9th), Cloud Storage (13th)

Oracle Database Backup Service

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 3.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Backup Service is 3.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure NetApp Files	3.4%
Oracle Database Backup Service	3.1%
Other	93.5%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Rajat Wadhwa

Cloud Architect at IBM

Cross-region replication has delivered seamless disaster recovery for enterprise storage needs

In terms of improvement, I would say cost reservation; the cost is a bit high. If we compare Azure Files and Azure NetApp Files, I know that customers are using less of Azure NetApp due to the cost. If they bring the cost a little bit closer to what Azure Files offers, it can be a great product in the market and bring a lot of business to NetApp. Backup is quite critical. As of now, Azure NetApp Files requires you to use Azure NetApp Backup solution, which is in public preview at the moment. I would definitely expect NetApp to come up with that solution so that customers can start using it because they do not have confidence in backup as it is still in preview. They are still doing some testing and research on that product, which is not officially released for use by multiple customers.

Read full review

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Achieve high availability and security with automated tasks over a decade

While there are some disadvantages in this product, from my experience with basic use cases, daily tasks, integration, scheduling, saving, and encryption, I have not encountered significant areas for improvement. However, the addition of a GUI configuration management and administration console for all administrative tasks would be highly beneficial. It would be preferable to have the ability to perform all console, terminal, and command line operations through a GUI interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its security and ease of use are most valuable."

"The critical features of this solution are SnapMirror for replication, data protection, and SnapLock."

"This solution is intuitive, easy to learn, and easy to use."

"It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable."

"This solution definitely makes us more efficient in being able to provide storage quickly to our customers in the Azure Cloud."

"Using Azure NetApp Files got us out of a really difficult situation quickly, effectively, and at a reasonable cost."

"I think the easiest part is, when you do a comparison, it is the throughput versus the cost. And it's much easier to set up."

"It's elastic, so it scales with our demands. We can start small, then with the addition of customer loads, we can expand on-the-fly without the need to reprovision something."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

"This is a product that I recommend to others who are interested in using it."

"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."

"We've definitely seen an ROI despite this being an expensive solution."

"It's a scalable product."

"I am satisfied with the licensing policy and pricing of this product."

"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."

"The backup is reliable and intuitive."

"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."

More Oracle Database Backup Service pros

Cons

"In terms of improvement, I would say cost reservation; the cost is a bit high. If we compare Azure Files and Azure NetApp Files, I know that customers are using less of Azure NetApp due to the cost."

"I would like to see multi-zone redundancy so that I don't have to worry about it. I just back up my data to that one SMB share and I know that it's replicated to a different region."

"The solution needs to improve it's ABS environment."

"It is about four times the cost of premium storage on Azure, so in order for us to use it, we'd have to be willing to increase our storage costs by four times."

"Reserved Instances for Azure NetApp Files would improve more use cases, making them more valuable in Azure as the cost would be reduced."

"It is expensive in small environments, which could be better. The reason is the four terabyte minimum."

"I have a hunch that storage could be now the most expensive portion of our monthly bill. So I can imagine that, not this year, but next year we will be talking about looking deeper into ways how we can optimize the cost."

"I don’t like the solution’s configuration and support."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

"The initial setup is overly complex, unnecessarily so."

"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."

"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."

"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."

"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."

"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."

"The installation process is easy for me because I have performed this action hundreds of times. However, it is important to note that beginners and even some senior professionals may encounter significant difficulties during installation."

"I have been working with Oracle Database Backup Service for five years, and it has already been quite an expensive and extensive experience."

More Oracle Database Backup Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent."

"It is expensive in small environments, which could be better. The reason is the four terabyte minimum. A one terabyte minimum would be better."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"This solution is very expensive compared to the alternatives."

"The price of Azure NetApp Files could be better."

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"NetApp is a premium offering, so it's not a cheap product, but it is well-priced. It combines a couple of properties which customers like us are willing to pay. Could it be cheaper? Yes, but if you combine fully supported, fully managed, easily provisioned, scalable, and quick all in one product, it's a good selling point. You can ask a lot of money for all these. If you have a use case like we do, it's a perfect match. It's like the Porsche of storage solutions in the cloud. It is totally worth the cost."

"The solution’s combination of the ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot. It is very fast to deploy. It's very easy to maintain. You don't have to do a lot in the cloud to maintain this thing, so it gives good performance. It's fast to deploy, easy to maintain, and it gives a better performance. These are the most basic three criteria for any application. This saves cost because the manpower you need to deploy is going down. You're getting better performance and not buying new resources. You have resources available in the cloud. It's just a couple of clicks, then you're good to go."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."

"The platform is expensive."

"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."

"The platform is expensive."

"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."

"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

On pricing, I would rate it around eight. It's highly priced, and there's no cost reservation option available compared to Azure Files. If NetApp could bring that kind of model for customers to sav...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure NetApp Files?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?

Oracle Database Backup Service is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?

There could be room for improvement regarding Oracle Database Backup Service, from the dashboard to pricing.I would like to see more AI, better customization, and additional features in future upda...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Database Backup Service?

Integration of Oracle Database Backup Service usually takes just a few hours.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Nasuni vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 30% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 20% of the time

Azure Blob Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files

October 2026

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database Backup Service

September 2026

Download Oracle Database Backup Service product report

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF

No data available

Overview

Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.

Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.

What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?

Flexibility: Supports diverse applications with robust Active Directory integration.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to increased performance demands.
Fast Snapshotting: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities.
SnapMirror: Provides effective replication features.
SnapLock: Ensures SEC compliance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

High Availability: Delivers reliable performance.
Cost-effective Throughput: Balances performance with expenditure.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data management tasks.
Non-disruptive Resizing: Facilitates seamless storage adjustments.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data effectively.

In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.

NetApp

Oracle Database Backup Service offers secure, scalable, and performance-optimized backup solutions. Its seamless integration and high availability features make it ideal for medium and large businesses managing extensive data volumes.

This service provides features like automated scheduling and recovery assurance, ensuring cost-efficiency and compliance for businesses. Reliable encrypted backups and an intuitive dashboard-driven interface enhance usability. Users can benefit from point-in-time recovery and robust integration capabilities, making it a dependable choice for data protection and recovery strategies.

What Are Key Features of Oracle Database Backup Service?

Differential and Cumulative Backup: Allows specific parts of the database to be backed up efficiently, saving time and storage space.
Automated Scheduling: Reduces operational costs by streamlining backup processes through automation.
Recovery Assurance: Comprehensive tools for reliable data recovery, safeguarding data.
Encrypted Backups: Ensures data security during storage and transmission.
Dashboard-Driven Interface: Simplifies management and monitoring through a user-friendly dashboard.
High Availability: Guarantees continuous data access and minimizes downtime.

What Benefits Should Users Expect from Reviews?

Cost Reduction: Significant savings from automated processes and optimized use of resources.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to industry regulations, reducing risks.
Security: Strong encryption and authentication methods protect sensitive information.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to growing business needs and data volumes.
Performance Tuning: Delivers optimized backup and recovery operations.

Oracle Database Backup Service is widely implemented in sectors such as banking and finance, where data reliability and security are paramount. Businesses utilize it for managing various types of backups, enabling efficient integration with SAP workloads. It plays a crucial role in ensuring business continuity and effective disaster recovery strategies, providing backend support that facilitates smooth project execution and server recovery.

Oracle

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic

Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

September 2026

Free Report: Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.