We performed a comparison between Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the autoscaling and self-healing."
"I have enjoyed working with all the features."
"It is appealing to us due to its complexity, which aligns well with our requirements."
"It employs high availability."
"The most valuable features of AKS are the full array of capabilities and robust security."
"The setup was straightforward and it took one hour to deploy."
"The solution is a managed Kubernetes, so much of the maintenance in the control plane is handled automatically by the cloud service provider."
"The serverless capability and auto scale feature are the most valuable."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"The stability is quite good."
"There is room for improvement in automation processes, as well."
"The engineering team can reduce the management of the platform itself by improving the data plane part of the system to upload more management."
"There are a lot of features that should be included with the AKS."
"The application firewall is lacking some features and there is room for enhancement."
"Unfortunately, when a microservice fails, Azure can take up to 60 seconds to broadcast an alert to the monitoring agents."
"It just loses out because you have less access to it programmatically, with less technical or customizable access."
"It can be tough to access the servers when onboarding."
"The solution's logs have room for improvement."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is ranked 13th in Container Security with 32 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) writes "Decreases administrative burdens and costs, has good diagnostic tools, and is easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is most compared with OpenShift, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, SUSE Rancher, Qualys VMDR and Tenable.io Container Security, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub. See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
