Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 22, 2025
Lacework FortiCNAPP and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) both compete in the cloud security and container orchestration markets. Based on the comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP holds an advantage in anomaly detection while AKS excels in integration and scalability within its ecosystem.
Features: Lacework FortiCNAPP offers robust anomaly detection, compliance monitoring using standards like CIS and NIST 800-53, and effective threat detection. AKS provides strong Azure ecosystem integration, automation, and powerful CI/CD capabilities, which enhance scalability and manageability for enterprise users.
Room for Improvement: Lacework FortiCNAPP needs better data visibility, enhanced third-party SIEM integrations, and a simpler user interface, alongside solving alert configuration challenges and gaining FedRAMP authorization. AKS should improve logging, visualization, CLI operation complexity, and reduce computational cost. Users also desire better non-Azure service integration and easier onboarding.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Lacework FortiCNAPP enables effective public cloud deployment and receives praise for its responsive technical support through channels like Slack. AKS offers versatile deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid cloud, yet users sometimes experience slower support despite strong integration support within Microsoft's ecosystem.
Pricing and ROI: Lacework’s pricing is relatively high for larger environments but offers notable ROI by reducing monitoring effort and anomaly management, justifying the expense. AKS operates on a pay-as-you-go model, incurring high costs dependent on resource usage, though the managed services benefits are valued. While Lacework saves costs through automation, AKS emphasizes elasticity and resource usage efficiency.
