AWS Shield vs Reblaze comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Link11 are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while Link11 is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.9% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Link11’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Link11 users who would recommend it.

AWS Shield

Read 7 AWS Shield reviews

2,537 Views
1,465 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Reblaze

Read 10 Reblaze reviews

340 Views
181 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Shield

Reblaze

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 31, 2025

Reblaze and AWS Shield compete in cloud-based web application security. AWS Shield appears to have an edge with superior features like comprehensive DDoS protection integrated with AWS services, while Reblaze garners positive feedback for pricing and customer support, making it appealing for cost-conscious businesses.

Features: Reblaze is noted for real-time threat visibility, an adaptive security model, and advanced bot mitigation. AWS Shield offers robust DDoS protection, seamless integration with AWS infrastructures, and focuses on automated resource scaling and consistent performance. Reblaze is flexible and easy to customize, while AWS Shield excels in integration and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Reblaze could improve its seamless integration with other cloud environments and provide more comprehensive documentation. It might also benefit from enhancing automated resource scaling capabilities. AWS Shield could improve by offering more competitive pricing, expanding support for non-AWS infrastructures, and enhancing ease of use for cloud newcomers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Reblaze offers straightforward deployment compatible with multiple clouds and delivers strong customer support with hands-on assistance and rapid response. AWS Shield benefits from integration within existing AWS environments, simplifying deployment for AWS users but potentially complicating it for new users. Reblaze is praised for personalized support, while AWS Shield leverages AWS's extensive resources and documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Reblaze is praised for its transparent pricing and cost-effectiveness, providing significant ROI through reduced security risks. AWS Shield, although potentially more costly, provides value with advanced features and deeper AWS integration, justifying its expense for enterprises heavily using AWS infrastructure. Reblaze attracts with competitive pricing, while AWS Shield offers premium features at a higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Shield vs. Reblaze Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield vs. Reblaze

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Shield

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Reblaze

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

16th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (22nd), Bot Management (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of AWS Shield is 6.9%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Reblaze is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

Manikandan-R

Senior Project Manager at Synopsys Inc

Solution provides essential protection with good support and a simple setup

I have noticed a pattern developing in approximately five minutes. If it were possible to provide these patterns with historical data spanning six months, three months, or two months directly from the console, it would be extremely beneficial. It would allow for easy inquiries and facilitate the retrieval of relevant parts without having to manually check logs or examine movements. Instead, if all historical data were available, I could consult six months' worth of identified patterns efficiently through AWS without relying on external sources. This solution is particularly suitable for startups or medium-sized startups. I would rate the overall solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Shivendra S.

Senior Director of Engineering - Information Security at Apna

Offers flexibility with a kill switch for bypassing Reblaze if needed and provides a reliable Layer 7 defense against attacks

There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town. AWS WAF, the Web Application Firewall from AWS, has a vast database of bad IP addresses due to its long-standing presence in this business. Reblaze, being a new entrant, is still building its database of bad IP addresses and malicious systems. So, Reblaze needs to work on that aspect. But other than that, I don't think scaling Reblaze has been an issue. There were some initial glitches, but they were all sorted out. So currently, I would say that the bot management and the database are areas they should focus on for further improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to use."

"I am impressed with the product's multiple features like security."

"The solution operates smoothly at its baseline level, and we do not encounter any issues at that level."

"It is quite scalable, and we have not faced any issues with its scalability."

"The solution's ease of use is the most valuable feature."

"The product has a good mechanism to analyze trends and trigger events."

"We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, which is crucial for us. It's easy to use and set up and stops attacks on our servers. We haven't encountered any attack problems because the solution stops them in real-time. AWS Shield specifically focuses on defending against denial-of-service attacks, making it a great solution for that type of threat."

"It is integrated with AWS. So, it gives you a good first step."

"The most valuable features were the real-time monitoring and the management. With this kind of product, you need a very good management system to allow you to see false positives in real-time; to see what's happening in real-time... The clarity stood out. It was very visible and very easy to navigate; very easy to find the data we were looking for."

"The best thing about Reblaze, for us, is that it has been a game changer because previously, we were using Google's Web Application Firewall, but it wasn't up to the mark."

"The main feature is using the rules and being able to see the traffic. It helps us find malicious traffic."

"Provides mobile app security."

"We like the website protection. It's really good. The dashboard is really simple to use."

"The feature I find most valuable is the user-friendly dashboard. It is easy to understand how everything works and it allows you to make decisions quickly and efficiently."

"It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease."

"The real-time monitoring and reporting are very good. There are information updates in their portal every two minutes. They also have the ability to spill it into Sumo Logic, for example. It's very easy to use."

More Reblaze pros

Cons

"Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced. Presently, it takes some time to determine whether a situation is normal or abnormal."

"The product should give users more flexibility to customize their security policies according to their requirements."

"Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced."

"We end up having to pay extra for features that AWS adds that we don't need."

"The time taken to detect anomalies must be reduced."

"The management of it is a bit hard. If you don't engineer it on the front side, it is hard to go back in and change it. It could be improved in terms of architecture requirements and then ongoing support requirements as a secondary component to it. People tend to set up things like this, and they just expect it to work without the care and feeding that needs to go back into it either from an application team or a network environment team."

"The product needs to improve its logs and reports to make it read better."

"The product is expensive."

"We have multiple products behind different instances of Reblaze. We have one instance for staging and then we have a production instance for multiple products. One of the things that we have requested is a unified view panel, so that we can see each of the instances in a unified view. That way, we won't have to go bouncing from instance to instance."

"I would like to have seen more automated reports. Maybe it has been improved in the last year and I'm just not aware of it. But from a managerial point of view, you want a summary report, a weekly report: How many attacks were blocked? How much bandwidth was saved due to the caching mechanism? What were the top-ten attacks that were tested on the network, etc? I could most likely have found all that data if I logged in to the system and ran different reports. It would be very helpful to get a management report on a weekly basis."

"The WAF features are not as granular as we would expect from a WAF system. There should be more granularity and in-depth rules, out-of-the-box."

"The next release should have next-generation automation."

"There is room for improvement in helping us understanding session management... We want Reblaze to catch and identify everything. We want to see the various devices doing one activity and to see, in a timeline, what's happened. We would like to see a more human-readable display to understand what's happening in the web app."

"Some of the settings on the dashboard are confusing."

"They have an interface that you have to adjust to. That is a bit of a downfall because I expect an interface to be very intuitive for someone who knows little about security. But if you know about security, the interface is wonderful."

"It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level requirements."

More Reblaze cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It depends on your subscription level and the volume that you're spending with AWS. So, it is very relative to the consumption alignment in your subscription level. It is a well-constructed, scalable pricing option, but it is relative to how much you're spending on AWS. Because the more you spend, typically, the more you get off on services like this. I find it to be comparable to other solutions."

"The tool is cheap."

"The cost depends on traffic each month, so on average, it costs us between US$200 and US$300 per month."

"We pay $3000 per month for the solution."

"The tool's pricing is good."

"On a monthly basis we pay $750."

"I believe that for the six instances we have right now, it's costing us $16,000 per month."

"There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town."

"We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Shield?

We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, whi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Shield?

The tool is cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Shield?

Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced. Presently, it takes some time to determine whether a situation is normal or abnormal. I am unsure how much this duration can be reduced...

See all answers

What do you like most about Reblaze?

It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Reblaze?

We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration. It is worth mentioning that these figures might not be current....

See all answers

What needs improvement with Reblaze?

There is a potential improvement regarding simplifying the complexity of rule creation. It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level re...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs AWS Shield

Compared 35% of the time

Azure DDoS Protection vs AWS Shield

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudflare One vs AWS Shield

Compared 18% of the time

Prolexic vs AWS Shield

Compared 4% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs AWS Shield

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS Shield Competitors

AWS WAF vs Reblaze

Compared 28% of the time

Cloudflare vs Reblaze

Compared 25% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Reblaze

Compared 18% of the time

Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs Reblaze

Compared 15% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Reblaze

Compared 14% of the time

More Reblaze Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield

June 2025

Download AWS Shield product report

Buyer's Guide

Reblaze

June 2025

Download Reblaze product report

Overview

AWS Shield is a managed Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection service that safeguards applications running on AWS. AWS Shield provides always-on detection and automatic inline mitigations that minimize application downtime and latency, so there is no need to engage AWS Support to benefit from DDoS protection.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Reblaze provides real-time monitoring, reporting, and botnet protections, enhancing security management with agile customization. Its intuitive dashboard supports efficient decision-making, while flexible rules and geo-blocking ensure security across geographies.

Reblaze is primarily deployed for web application firewall (WAF), DDoS prevention, and bot management, effectively defending against Layer 7 DDoS, phishing, SQL injections, cross-site scripting, and unwanted IP traffic. Supporting both public and private cloud deployments, including Amazon-hosted applications, Reblaze filters malicious activities to safeguard internet businesses. Users appreciate its comprehensive security approach, particularly for mobile app protection through its API and advanced filtering against script injections. Room for improvement includes change management, automation, reporting alerts, session management, and more granular WAF features. Adjustments in pricing and enhancements for bot management and bad IP address databases are sought after.

What are Reblaze's Most Important Features?

Intuitive Dashboard: Facilitates efficient decision-making with customizable settings.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides active tracking and instant security insights.
WAF with Traffic Analysis: Allows detailed inspection of all incoming traffic.
Swift DDoS Defense: Rapid response against distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Flexible Rule Management: Supports extensive customization for specific needs.
Geo-Blocking: Secures resources from threats originating in specific locations.
API Security: Offers robust protection for mobile applications.
Advanced Filtering: Shields against SQL and script injection threats.

What Benefits Should Be Evaluated in Reviews?

Enhanced Security: The ability to detect and neutralize latest attacks.
Efficient Customization: Tailoring security measures to fit organizational requirements.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications of security events for prompt action.
Cloud Deployment Flexibility: Compatibility with public and private cloud environments.

In finance, Reblaze addresses the stringent demands of data protection. E-commerce platforms benefit from its robust perimeter defenses against typical threats. Healthcare industries utilize its capabilities to secure sensitive patient data, leveraging both real-time monitoring and responsive alert systems to maintain compliance and integrity.

Link11

Sample Customers

netflix, dow jones, mapbox, pearson, rovio, youview, moviestar planet, asurion, payplug, hour of code

eBay, AirAsia, Taboola, Reebonz, IAI, Payoneer, mySupermarket, William Hill, Fanduel

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield vs. Reblaze

June 2025

Free Report: AWS Shield vs. Reblaze

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Shield vs. Reblaze and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Shield vs. Reblaze report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.