AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] vs Carbonite Migrate comparison

"The tool is automatic and makes migration easy."

"Mature, resilient, and seamless database and server migration solution that's stable and scalable."

"The solution's setup phase was straightforward."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Carbonite Migrate works well in Windows platform migrations and in the case of a VML platform. The migration is smooth in Windows environments."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"Carbonite Migrate is helpful on an infrastructure level."

"The documentation and videos could be improved, especially in the area of migration. Live videos would be helpful. There are very limited videos available."

"The product's cloud security could be improved. It also needs to improve its stability."

"The database schema conversion could be made more seamless for this solution. Widening the scope of features for database migration will also help."

"There is no monitoring support available in the solution."

"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved. During RHEL migration with multiple data areas, you have to create a similar source environment at the destination. This can be challenging because you have to install it, create the VM, install over it, and mount it at the mount point. Only then can you do the migration."

"Carbonite failed when moving GIS data."

"We find it very difficult to use these tools in a multi-cloud environment"

"There is no need to pay for any licensing since it is an open-source tool."

"In terms of pricing, I think it's an expensive tool."

"The licensing costs are really high."