We performed a comparison between AWS Security Hub and Tenable.sc based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.sc provides precise identification of vulnerabilities, compliance and vulnerability scans, and a risk-oriented methodology. On the other hand, AWS Security Hub receives commendation for its integration capabilities, immediate alerts, and thorough notifications regarding potential compliance concerns. Tenable.sc and AWS Security Hub both have areas where they could improve. Tenable.sc needs to work on their penetration testing, pricing, ticketing, GUI, reporting, vendor training, and accuracy of vulnerability assessments. AWS Security Hub requires more integration options, better UI, multi-cloud compatibility, faster updates, and easier configuration.
Service and Support: Tenable.sc's customer service has received mixed feedback, with varying levels of helpfulness. In comparison, AWS Security Hub's support is praised for being prompt and good.
Ease of Deployment: Tenable.sc's initial setup is praised for being simple and quick, with the cloud version taking only one day and the on-prem version taking two to three weeks. Meanwhile, AWS Security Hub's setup is also considered easy, though it does involve policy configuration and some upkeep.
Pricing: Tenable.sc charges based on the number of IP addresses and has mixed opinions on pricing, while AWS Security Hub has reasonable pricing.
ROI: Tenable.sc is cost-effective and offers a guaranteed ROI with a significant reduction in manpower costs. In contrast, AWS Security Hub does not provide the same level of value, despite offering a positive outcome.
Comparison Results: Tenable.sc is seen as the superior choice when compared to AWS Security Hub by users. This is due to its extensive features, including accurate vulnerability detection, compliance and vulnerability scans, and a risk-based approach. Tenable.sc also provides advanced scanning, asset discovery, and scoring, which are not found in AWS Security Hub. Although AWS Security Hub is praised for its integration capabilities and real-time alerts, Tenable.sc's analysis, prioritization, and usability features make it a more valuable tool for vulnerability analysis and remediation progress tracking.
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The first thing that stood out was the ease of installation and the quick value we got out of the solution."
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Security Hub is the ability to track when monitoring is not enabled on any of my resources."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud."
"Currently, our organization utilizes AWS for various purposes, including SaaS (Software as a Service), PaaS (Platform as a Service), and hosting applications in the cloud. We develop our applications and use AWS services as a platform for basic functions and secondary development needs. Additionally, we rely on PaaS for accounting services. Approximately, 50% of our applications are hosted in the cloud environment, making it a significant part of our current setup."
"Very good at detection and providing real-time alerts."
"The solution shows us our compliance score."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to manage...It is a scalable solution."
"Cloudposse is a valuable feature as it guarantees my security."
"I find all of the features to be highly valuable."
"This product has the best results in terms of the lowest number of false-positives and false-negatives."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."
"I think that this is a good solution for evaluating vulnerability in the network."
"Tenable.sc is user-friendly."
"The tool provides us insight into the happens of the network and its hosts. It provides me with a list of hosts."
"Compared to other products, the most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and ability to provide visibility over scan results while providing many templates to users, making it a helpful tool."
"Initial setup was pretty straightforward."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."
"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."
"The support must be quicker."
"AWS Security Hub's configuration and integration are areas where it lacks and needs to improve."
"The solution will only give you insight if you have configure rule enabled. It should work more like Prisma Cloud and Dome9 which have a better approach."
"Adding SIEM features would be beneficial because of the limited customization of AWS Security Hub."
"The telemetry doesn't always go into the control center. When you have multiple instances running in AWS, you need a control tower to take feeds from Security Hub and analyze your results. Sometimes exemptions aren't passed between the control tower and Security Hub. The configuration gets mixed up or you don't get the desired results."
"The solution lacks self-sufficiency."
"Whenever my team gets some alarms from the central team, my team needs to initiate whether it's a real or false trigger. The central team needs to keep adjusting to the parameters or at least the concerned IPs, whether it's really from the company's pool of IPs, so the trigger process can be improved. In the next release of AWS Security Hub, I'd like a better dashboard that could result in better alert visibility."
"One aspect that could be improved in the solution is its adaptability to different markets and geopolitical restrictions. In certain regions like Thailand, specific services from certain countries or providers, such as AWS or Azure, might be limited or blocked. It also needs improvement in would require configuring the solution more adaptable to AWS infrastructure and function."
"I think the vendor training provided for Tenable.sc could be a lower price. It's quite expensive for the training."
"The product could be user-friendly, and they could enhance the web application's security features."
"Tenable's reporting engine needs improvement. It needs to be more efficient and add more features."
"Tenable SC can improve by adding more integrations with HCI-type tools and more accurate vulnerability detection."
"Deploying Tenable.sc is highly complex because it's an on-prem solution, whereas Tenable.io is cloud-based, so you can go live as soon as you log in. Tenable.sc involves significant integration with other on-prem solutions, and the deployment takes about two to three weeks with the help of a system integrator"
"Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers."
"The user interface can be improved."
"In terms of configuration, there is some level of flexibility that we are not able to achieve."
AWS Security Hub is ranked 14th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 16 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 10th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 48 reviews. AWS Security Hub is rated 7.6, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Security Hub writes "A centralized dashboard that enables efficient monitoring and management of possible security issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". AWS Security Hub is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Splunk Enterprise Security and Lacework, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. See our AWS Security Hub vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
