No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Organizations vs Brinqa comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Organizations
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
IT Governance (5th)
Brinqa
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (59th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (45th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (50th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Organizations is designed for IT Governance and holds a mindshare of 1.9%, up 0.7% compared to last year.
Brinqa, on the other hand, focuses on Vulnerability Management, holds 0.5% mindshare, up 0.4% since last year.
IT Governance Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Organizations1.9%
RSA Archer24.2%
IBM OpenPages16.2%
Other57.7%
IT Governance
Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Brinqa0.5%
Wiz6.4%
Tenable Nessus4.9%
Other88.2%
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group
Manages multiple accounts efficiently with streamlined billing and centralized oversight
The main feature of AWS Organizations that I find valuable is the management of multiple accounts. I can manage billing, access, and security for all accounts from a single point instead of managing them separately. It provides a single pane of glass for oversight. Additionally, its consolidated billing feature streamlines customer financial workflows. Since it is a free service, it is cost-effective for managing multiple accounts.
RB
Cybersecurity Director at RB Consultancy
Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs
I would give the easiness of the initial setup a seven out of ten. It can be a bit complex. Some connections are straightforward, but some take a long time. Deploying Brinqa took time, as it was done in phases. Initially, it took about six months before we started getting valuable data from it. Then, it expanded from there. The deployment began with a product demo and contract negotiation. We connected some data sources to Brinqa's cloud service, which was straightforward. We used the default risk ranking algorithm but faced issues with the dashboards, so we customized them to fit our organization's needs over a few years. We depended a lot on Brinqa for the deployment. We had some internal resources, but they lacked the needed skills, so it took time to train our two-man team. Initially, it required one person for maintenance, and they spent most of their time on it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The main feature of AWS Organizations that I find valuable is the management of multiple accounts."
"The main feature of AWS Organizations that I find valuable is the management of multiple accounts, as I can manage billing, access, and security for all accounts from a single point instead of managing them separately, and it provides a single pane of glass for oversight while its consolidated billing feature streamlines customer financial workflows and, being a free service, is cost-effective for managing multiple accounts."
"The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."
 

Cons

"An option to bind a card or add a payment button would enhance the service."
"An option to bind a card or add a payment button would enhance the service."
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Governance solutions are best for your needs.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Retailer
14%
Computer Software Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AWS Organizations?
An option to bind a card or add a payment button would enhance the service. It would allow customers like me to easily make payments instead of navigating through individual accounts.
What is your primary use case for AWS Organizations?
I use AWS Organizations to manage multiple accounts. It is similar to SSO. The main difference is that I use JamCloud for sign-in. AWS Organizations acts like a parent account with multiple child a...
What advice do you have for others considering AWS Organizations?
For users like me with larger customer bases who have multiple accounts and want to streamline their billing and management from a single account, AWS Organizations is a good solution. Overall, I r...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, Qualys, IBM and others in IT Governance. Updated: March 2026.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.