No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Lambda vs IBM Streams comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Lambda
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Compute Service (1st)
IBM Streams
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (23rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

AWS Lambda and IBM Streams aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AWS Lambda is designed for Compute Service and holds a mindshare of 14.5%, down 18.2% compared to last year.
IBM Streams, on the other hand, focuses on Streaming Analytics, holds 2.1% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.
Compute Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Lambda14.5%
Amazon EC214.4%
AWS Fargate9.5%
Other61.6%
Compute Service
Streaming Analytics Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Streams2.1%
Databricks7.4%
Apache Flink6.9%
Other83.6%
Streaming Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Rajaraman Ramachandran - PeerSpot reviewer
Co Founder And CTO at Gamucopia Creatives
Has enabled us to manage compute resources efficiently while supporting multiple languages
AWS Lambda needs to improve cold start time. Some AWS Lambda functions require a cold start, and if you need AWS Lambda to provide quick responses, you need some of the AWS Lambdas to be always on, which is risky. We need AWS Lambda's cold start time to be reduced so that we can use it much faster than now. We need a better way to handle the cold start. We should be able to start AWS Lambda much before in a predictable way instead of just calling and then having it start.
Ahmed_Emad - PeerSpot reviewer
Territory Sales Leader at Sumerge
A solution for data pipelines but has connector limitations
We have used Kafka for seven years. IBM streams gives you many OOTB features that can boost the time-to-market, especially when it comes to reporting and monitoring for example. Confluent is recognized as one of the leaders in this space and the main reason for this is related to the complete vision of the platform also the large number of connectors. This gives the edge and competitive advatnage.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found all of the features valuable. It's an easy and cheap solution."
"In summary, this is a good product, it does what it is supposed to, and I recommend it."
"The feature I found most valuable about Lambda is the fact that it's serverless."
"We migrated from an on-premise server to the cloud with the Lamda solution and we found it less than one-10th of the cost of what it used to be."
"Everybody should check out AWS Lambda."
"The tool scales automatically based on the number of incoming requests."
"The solution runs on the latest cloud technology so it is easy to deploy cloud-native projects."
"One of the most valuable features of AWS Lambda is the performance. Lambda is very technical and has very high performance, as well as good real-time performance."
"The OEM Solution (Excel-medical.com) running on top of IBM Streams provides real-time clinical algorithms that can give better insight into the patient's acuity, thus cutting off time to discharge patients and inversely making sure that sick patients don't get discharged until ready."
"Easy development and deployment, Java implementation features, and the real time analyser and alarm function are the most valuable features for us."
"The product has enabled us to create solutions to client problems that would have either been impossible or very expensive/difficult using other technologies."
"As a result, the TELCO company was able to cut down the time it took to respond to customer needs and there were fewer complaints."
 

Cons

"The execution time could be better. One of the major limitations is the time period because it doesn't give you more than seven minutes."
"AWS Lambda has a limitation where the execution time is capped at 15 minutes per task. Increasing this time would allow for handling heavier tasks more efficiently."
"Its performance can be improved. There should also be more dynamic security permissions."
"At one point, there was an issue receiving support for a new version. Support was behind by two versions and this presented challenges, but they caught up over time."
"Lambda might not be the best solution right now for high-traffic applications."
"I would like to see the five zero four AWS Lambda invocation fixed. This is basically a time-out error."
"The overall performance of this solution could be improved. We would also like to have better integration with other AWS features."
"My opinion is that the integration could be improved in this solution. We have had some difficulties integrating the EC2 module, but we found a solution for that by ourselves."
"The price and versatility of this product need to improve - it is not inexpensive."
"We had some stability issues where we used embedded Zookeeper in production."
"The development IDE sometimes crashes and freezes."
"I’d like to see a tool kit specifically targeted at incremental machine learning. It’s already great for scoring previously trained models, but dynamically updating models is currently more of a 'grow your own' kind of thing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For licensing, we pay a yearly subscription."
"You're not paying for a server if you're not using it, which is another reason I like it. So, you're not paying if you're not using it. It scales, and you're charged based on usage. It all depends on the use case. Some can be extremely inexpensive if you have very low volume transaction rates. That way, you don't have to fire up and absorb the cost of the servers just sitting there waiting for a transaction to come through. You're only paying when you use it. So, depending upon the use model, Lambda could be highly efficient relative to an EC2 solution. You don't have to have things reallocated."
"Its pricing is on the higher side."
"AWS Lambda is not expensive for micro testing but is expensive if used for long deployment or long services."
"The price is expensive and is based on usage. The more users you have the higher the cost."
"This is a product that is pay-per-use, as opposed to a licensing fee."
"The price of AWS Lambda is priced very low."
"AWS Lambda license is paid on a monthly basis."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
Government
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business37
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise46
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better, AWS Lambda or Batch?
AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Lambda?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been positive. Based on the execution and time duration of execution, it is much cheaper than expected.
What needs improvement with AWS Lambda?
AWS Lambda could be improved regarding the execution time size, as the duration of execution time is fixed at 15 minutes currently, so we could increase it. I don't have anything more to add about ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
IBM InfoSphere Streams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix
Globo TV, All England Lawn Tennis Club, CenterPoint Energy, Consolidated Communications Holdings, Darwin Ecosystem, Emory University Hospital, ICICI Securities, Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), Living Roads, Mobileum, Optibus, Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform (SOSCIP), University of Alberta, University of Montana, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Wimbledon 2015
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: October 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.