AWS CodePipeline vs Chef comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Progress Software are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4, while Progress Software is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.6% mindshare in BA, compared to Progress Software’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

AWS CodePipeline

Read 23 AWS CodePipeline reviews

2,709 Views
2,128 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Chef

Read 19 Chef reviews

282 Views
172 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

Chef

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Chef and AWS CodePipeline compete in the realm of automation and integration tools. AWS CodePipeline seems to have the upper hand given its seamless integration within the AWS ecosystem, which offers comprehensive solutions for end-to-end automation.

Features: Chef is recognized for its infrastructure automation capabilities, supporting complex systems with robust community support for cookbooks. It offers flexibility in managing diverse environments and simplifies recipe writing and deployment. AWS CodePipeline is praised for its deployment and integration automation within the AWS services, boasting extensive compatibility and native integration with AWS tools. The flexibility of configurations and integration with various applications are noteworthy features of CodePipeline.

Room for Improvement: Chef could benefit from easier integration processes and reducing its learning curve for new users. Enhancements in its user interface can make it more accessible to non-technical users. Moreover, streamlined rollback processes would improve its deployment capabilities. AWS CodePipeline can enhance its capabilities by improving cross-account deployment procedures, offering better support for non-AWS environments, and extending documentation for complex scenarios involving third-party integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS CodePipeline offers straightforward deployment for AWS users due to its native integration within the ecosystem, supported by detailed documentation and AWS customer services. Chef provides flexibility suitable for varied environments but may present a steeper learning curve for new users, with support available through its community and standard customer service channels.

Pricing and ROI: Chef offers pricing flexibility that can provide cost efficiencies across diverse IT environments. Its pricing varies based on usage and deployment scale, often resulting in higher ROI for complex environments. AWS CodePipeline features a simple pricing model, proving cost-effective for AWS users by minimizing integration costs and delivering consistent AWS-centric deployment benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. Chef Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. Chef

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.8

AWS CodePipeline optimizes development efficiency and resources, enhancing monitoring with expected financial returns similar to AWS Batch.

Sentiment score

8.1

Chef improved deployment time, reduced human error, enhanced scalability, optimized resource use, and strengthened compliance and security management.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS CodePipeline report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Chef report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.1

AWS CodePipeline support receives mixed reviews, with faster assistance in business plans; documentation helps some manage independently.

Sentiment score

6.1

Customers commend Chef for its responsive support, active community, comprehensive documentation, and efficient issue resolution despite occasional delays.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS CodePipeline report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Chef report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.8

AWS CodePipeline is scalable and flexible, efficiently managing deployments across languages with high user satisfaction, despite Linux limitations.

Sentiment score

7.8

Chef is highly scalable, efficiently managing infrastructures of all sizes and accommodating numerous clients based on server capacity.

AWS CodePipeline is good for scalability, and I rate it as nine out of ten.

Jeyhun Rashidov

Head of Development at Abyss

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS CodePipeline report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Chef report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.4

AWS CodePipeline is highly stable and reliable, with minimal issues if correctly configured, aligning well with CI/CD expectations.

Sentiment score

7.7

Users rate Chef's stability 8-9/10, comparing it favorably to competitors like Ansible, and find it stable for various use cases.

I rate the stability of AWS CodePipeline as a ten out of ten because I have not experienced any issues with it.

Jeyhun Rashidov

Head of Development at Abyss

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS CodePipeline report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Chef report

Room For Improvement

AWS CodePipeline users want lower costs, faster builds, enhanced multi-cloud support, better integrations, UI, customization, and improved technical documentation.

Chef needs better support, pricing, role management, flexibility, documentation, integration, and improved automation to compete with Ansible.

The documentation for AWS CodePipeline is lacking and makes it difficult to find information due to its complexity.

Jeyhun Rashidov

Head of Development at Abyss

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS CodePipeline report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Chef report

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find AWS CodePipeline cost-effective and flexible, with monthly costs typically under $5 per pipeline.

Chef offers subscription plans with valuable automation features, but enterprise pricing is high and requires contacting sales for quotes.

I estimated it costs around $5 monthly.

Jeyhun Rashidov

Head of Development at Abyss

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS CodePipeline report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Chef report

Valuable Features

AWS CodePipeline excels in integration, flexibility, cost-efficiency, security, and simplifies transitions with robust deployment and management tools.

Chef offers compliance, easy configuration management, and automation for IT infrastructure, integrating with CI processes and supporting multiple clouds.

It allows me to test changes in an isolated environment before deploying them to the entire user base.

Jeyhun Rashidov

Head of Development at Abyss

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS CodePipeline report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Chef report

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Chef

Ranking in Build Automation

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (11th), Configuration Management (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 5.6%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Chef is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

Aaron P

DevOps Engineer at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Easy configuration management, optimization abilities, and complete infrastructure and application automation

In terms of improvement, Chef could get better by being more widely available, adapting to different needs, and providing better documentation. There is also an issue with shared resources like cookbooks lacking context, which could lead to problems when multiple companies use them. Chef should aim for wider availability, better flexibility, clearer documentation, and improved management of shared resources to prevent conflicts. Many companies are now moving to Ansible, so I would recommend better documentation, easier customer use, and simpler integration. I have concerns about the complexity of migrating to different servers and would prefer a simpler process.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

17%

University

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.

See all answers

What do you like most about Chef?

Chef is a great tool for an automation person who wants to do configuration management with infrastructure as a code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Chef?

Chef is priced based on the number of nodes.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Chef?

Chef does not support the containerized things of Chef products. In the future, Chef could develop a docker container or docker images.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 63% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 9% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

BigFix vs Chef

Compared 33% of the time

AWS Systems Manager vs Chef

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Chef

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Chef

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Chef

Compared 9% of the time

More Chef Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline

April 2025

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Chef

April 2025

Download Chef product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

No data available

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Chef, is the leader in DevOps, driving collaboration through code to automate infrastructure, security, compliance and applications. Chef provides a single path to production making it faster and safer to add value to applications and meet the demands of the customer. Deployed broadly in production by the Global 5000 and used by more than half of the Fortune 500, Chef develops 100 percent of its software as open source under the Apache 2.0 license with no restrictions on its use. Chef Enterprise Automation Stack™, a commercial distribution, is developed solely from that open source code and unifies security, compliance, infrastructure and application automation with observability. Chef provides an unequaled developer experience for the Coded Enterprise by enabling users to express infrastructure, security policies and the application lifecycle as code, modernizing development, packaging and delivery of any application to any platform. For more information, visit http://chef.io and follow @chef.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Facebook, Standard Bank, GE Capital, Nordstrom, Optum, Barclays, IGN, General Motors, Scholastic, Riot Games, NCR, Gap

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. Chef

April 2025

Free Report: AWS CodePipeline vs. Chef

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodePipeline vs. Chef and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodePipeline vs. Chef report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.