AWS CodeBuild vs LaunchDarkly comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and LaunchDarkly are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while LaunchDarkly is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.5% mindshare in BA, compared to LaunchDarkly’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of LaunchDarkly users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeBuild

Read 12 AWS CodeBuild reviews

548 Views
548 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

LaunchDarkly

Read 7 LaunchDarkly reviews

262 Views
262 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

LaunchDarkly

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

AWS CodeBuild and LaunchDarkly compete in the DevOps lifecycle, focusing on automation and feature management. AWS CodeBuild might have an edge for those deeply integrated with AWS, while LaunchDarkly offers superior feature management capabilities.

Features: AWS CodeBuild is known for seamless integration with AWS services, automatic scaling, and support for multiple programming languages. LaunchDarkly stands out with its comprehensive feature flagging capabilities, custom environments, and robust team collaboration tools.

Room for Improvement: AWS CodeBuild could enhance its user interface for easier navigation, improve documentation for beginners, and offer better support for non-AWS ecosystems. LaunchDarkly may benefit from more detailed analytics, expanded integrations with additional CI/CD tools, and more customizable user access controls.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS CodeBuild offers swift deployment within AWS environments, backed by extensive documentation. LaunchDarkly is user-friendly, with an intuitive setup process and responsive customer service for feature management across platforms.

Pricing and ROI: AWS CodeBuild has competitive pricing based on build minutes, providing cost efficiency for AWS-heavy projects. LaunchDarkly employs tiered pricing based on feature usage, offering ROI through accelerated feature delivery and risk reduction.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. LaunchDarkly Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. LaunchDarkly

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LaunchDarkly

Ranking in Build Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LaunchDarkly is 0.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Mahadev Metre

DevOps Engineer at Paydoh

Integration with diverse environments boosts productivity and automation

AWS CodeBuild's support for a wide range of programming languages and build environments benefits development teams significantly in terms of productivity and ease of use. There are extensive libraries of code structures available, making it a universal pipeline. All programming languages I have worked with are supported in AWS CodeBuild, eliminating the need for alternative deployment services. The service supports iOS builds, Kotlin, Java, NodeJS, and ReactJS. AWS has made it accessible to all languages, allowing developers to simply open the console and trigger builds. AWS manages all the background server operations for building or deploying code. For standard builds such as ReactJS or Java, a Linux or Ubuntu server suffices. AWS provides its own operating system for these purposes. For builds requiring physical servers, such as Apple macOS server, AWS rents Mac minis specifically for iOS and SwiftUI builds. While this incurs higher charges, it demonstrates AWS's commitment to providing comprehensive solutions for all use cases.

Read full review

Ramya Nallamsetty

Associate at Cognizant

Enables us to target users and control what needs to be visible on their screens but it sometimes breaks down

We use LaunchDarkly for managing feature flags. It helps manage the keys to control what users view on our screens By managing the feature flags, we can target users and control what needs to be visible on their screens. I like that it offers the ability to control the flags. We need experience…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."

"AWS CodeBuild reduces wait time and optimizes workflows."

"The integration is a good feature."

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."

"The solution provides good integrations."

"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"I like that it offers the ability to control the flags."

"I appreciate that we can release any feature in production and maintain control over it."

"The setup is easy."

"From the development side, it allows us to manage multiple things."

"It has really helped during the series of product lines and faster deployment and faster development."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The ability to turn off a flag is crucial when a task is not complete, especially if there is an error in a commit."

Cons

"Multiple clients have faced issues with pricing. After migrating from Azure to EC2, they were unexpectedly charged 100,000 rupees because the pricing details were not clearly visible."

"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."

"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

"The deployment fails sometimes."

"For improvement, I'd suggest more build instance-type options. There's a big jump from 15 gigabytes of RAM to 150, and I'd like something in between as the larger option is too expensive for our needs."

"One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors."

"The front-end interface and the management are somewhat challenging, and there's a lot of space for improvement."

"Notifications could be added, or SNS integration could be included so that notifications can be received on every build, whether the build fails or succeeds."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"When the system has an excessive number of feature flags, managing them can become cumbersome."

"The feature where one feature flag is dependent on another could be explored more for our usage."

"Right now, no improvements are needed."

"We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns."

"I have used LaunchDarkly for around two and a half years and I haven't faced any issues with it."

"I strongly believe they need to develop a strategy for handling situations where LaunchDarkly goes down."

"Fetching information about multiple flags in a single action would be beneficial."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Media Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeBuild?

It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

The cost structure is affordable for most builds except macOS servers. Standard builds can utilize AWS EC2 servers for background operations. However, macOS or iOS builds require physical servers m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

The servers used for macOS and iOS builds are limited in availability, operating only in US East 1 and East 2, and US West 1 and West 2. This geographical limitation causes latency issues and exten...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LaunchDarkly?

I consider the pricing to be high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LaunchDarkly?

We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns. I would rate LaunchDarkly a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LaunchDarkly?

We use LaunchDarkly for managing feature flags. It helps manage the keys to control what users view on our screens.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 37% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 23% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 22% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 18% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

Harness vs LaunchDarkly

Compared 100% of the time

More LaunchDarkly Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild

August 2025

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

July 2025

Download LaunchDarkly product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

LaunchDarkly is acclaimed for its feature flag management, enabling safer, high-velocity code deployment and precise control over rollouts. Organizations use it to test, deploy, and manage features across user segments, performing canary releases and quick rollbacks without new code deployment. Users praise its robust flag system, real-time updates, detailed targeting, comprehensive analytics, and strong integration capabilities, significantly enhancing development efficiency and productivity.

LaunchDarkly

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. LaunchDarkly

July 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeBuild vs. LaunchDarkly

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild vs. LaunchDarkly and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeBuild vs. LaunchDarkly report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.