AWS Auto Scaling vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Cisco are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #42 with an average rating of 8.5, while Cisco is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Cisco’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

AWS Auto Scaling

Read 22 AWS Auto Scaling reviews

2,590 Views
2,486 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Cisco Provider Connectivity...

Read 24 Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance reviews

6,817 Views
3,477 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Auto Scaling

Cisco Provider Connectivity...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Accedian Skylight and AWS Auto Scaling are two prominent solutions in the market. AWS Auto Scaling stands out for its robust features, making it a preferred choice despite the higher cost.

Features: Accedian Skylight offers network performance monitoring, troubleshooting capabilities, and efficient data visualization. AWS Auto Scaling provides automatic scaling, flexibility, and integration with various AWS services.

Room for Improvement: Accedian Skylight needs better integration with existing infrastructure, a more intuitive user interface, and faster customer service responses. AWS Auto Scaling could benefit from improved documentation, reduced complexity, and a more streamlined initial setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Accedian Skylight users find deployment straightforward but mention occasional delays in customer service. AWS Auto Scaling users report a steep learning curve during deployment but commend prompt customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Accedian Skylight has a reasonable setup cost with a decent ROI. AWS Auto Scaling has higher setup costs, but its extensive features and automation justify the expense, resulting in a higher perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

42nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco Provider Connectivity...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

41st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (45th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance	0.9%
AWS Auto Scaling	0.5%
Other	98.6%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe

DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech

Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency

I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.

Read full review

Pifu Lin

Senior System Engineer at DYNASAFE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.

Addresses connectivity issues with real-time monitoring while offering good local support

I had prepared for COC and the client. I work as a vendor for a client using Flow Mount for network performance monitoring. I focus on resolving client-side issues related to Packy Performance and quality use. This involves addressing network device issues, specifically Cisco network devices One…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."

"The automation aspect where you can automate it to whatever you want is what I value the most about Auto Scaling."

"The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively."

"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."

"The setup is not very complex."

"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."

"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."

"I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient."

More AWS Auto Scaling pros

"APM analysis is much faster than traditional root cause analysis of application problems."

"I always have the Skylight dashboard on one of my screens... Now you can create your own dashboard, specific to an application, specific to a server, or to something else."

"Skylight is not used on a daily basis, but when it's used it usually helps to fix a problem pretty fast."

"The pricing of Accedian Skylight is really good; the sensors are low cost, their licensing model lets clients start small and grow as they need without being forced into expensive appliances or subscription models, and that is one of the things that we really like about offering it to our clients because they are not left out getting the right sort of information straightaway."

"Ease of use; can literally diagnose an issue in about four clicks."

"Capturing traffic [is very interesting]. Currently, with our configuration, we don't capture the payload of the packets, just the header. But when we want the body, the payload of the packets, we can do a PCAP, and then analyze it within Wireshark."

"Performance Vision saves time diagnosing performance problems and anticipates where investment is needed by pointing to the infrastructure limitations."

"We heavily use the "network analysis" section to dissect and analyze flows."

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance pros

Cons

"There hasn't been a need for improvements."

"If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help."

"The product’s security features need improvement."

"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."

"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."

"The product could add more features for managing instances."

"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."

"Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling."

More AWS Auto Scaling cons

"Support for more VoIP systems, Avaya, etc."

"I would like to see some improvements in parts of their synthetic transactions, which includes all the latency, jitter, and throughput. I would like to see some Layer 7 analytics in there. I want to be able to do a DNS request, HTTP GET request, or even SIP call point-to-point or via registration."

"The Accedian Skylight user interface still has room for improvement."

"The UI interface of Accedian Skylight could improve."

"Increase the drive’s capacity to store more data, and maybe switch to a database system similar to 3Big-Data."

"We have encountered problems with the license that is connected to the hypervisor on which the virtual appliance is deployed."

"It's a bit slow. When I execute a query, something general with a short timeframe that covers one month, for instance, and I do not specify the IP source or IP destination, it can take ages because it has to query the whole database."

"So scalability, at the moment, is pretty bad for us now, because our modus operandi have totally shifted."

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."

"The product is expensive."

"The product has moderate pricing."

"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."

"It provides value and the cost is not huge."

"The pricing of Accedian Skylight is really good. The sensors are low cost. Their model to analytics for sensors is by license, endpoint, or session. With the probes for their analytics, if they get deployed virtually, they are free. The licensing is only based on flows. So, you can effectively deploy probes everywhere in your network. Then, if you want to look at a specific type of traffic, you can enter into it with a very low cost license. You can just use things like spam ports, mirrors, TAPs, and aggregators to optimize what sort of traffic you send to these analysis tools. Then, if you want to start looking at more, you can up your licensed as you go. You are not getting forced into expensive appliances or subscription models."

"The solution was previously well-regarded, but after being acquired by Accedian, the prices have significantly increased. This has made it challenging to sell the product due to its high cost. It is an expensive solution."

"We understand there's a significant cost difference, but have yet to investigate fully."

"If you look into Riverbed, it's a licensing nightmare. You need to pay for every type of analysis... If you don't look into licensing, Riverbed and SolarWinds are pretty comparable. But if you look into licensing it would not be smart to go for either of them. On the pure, bare-metal basis, it's the same. But when you get the bare metal and a few basic licenses, then you need all those other licenses just to be sure that there's no issue... One of the great things about Skylight is you have them all, and you actually need them all."

"It's not for free, clearly. But on the other hand, it offers very interesting functionality. We pay around €100,000."

"The pricing is cheaper than other competing products, which is better for our budgets."

"Pricing is a little bit expensive."

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Educational Organization

11%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?

I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?

AWS Auto Scaling can be improved in many ways, such as providing better visibility into scaling decisions and clarifying why exactly scaling happens. Sometimes, I am not sure why scaling occurs. Ea...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Auto Scaling?

My main use case for AWS Auto Scaling is automatically scaling EC2 instances behind a load balancer based on traffic, CPU, and memory usage, as well as custom CloudWatch metrics. I also use it with...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Accedian Skylight?

Human resource costs can be high when dealing with connection issues. I require more tools to file and resolve these issues efficiently.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Accedian Skylight?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Accedian Skylight?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 11% of the time

Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors

Dynatrace vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 6% of the time

DX SaaS vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 4% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download AWS Auto Scaling product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

October 2026

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance report

Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance product report

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling

Accedian Skylight, Accedian SkyLIGHT PVX, SkyLIGHT PVX, SecurActive, Performance Vision

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling optimizes resource use by automatically adjusting instances based on demand. It integrates with CloudWatch for seamless monitoring, enhancing system reliability and cost efficiency without manual intervention.

AWS Auto Scaling is designed to dynamically scale resources in response to demand, supporting horizontal and vertical scaling for optimal performance. It integrates well with AWS services like EC2 and ECS, allowing for flexible and scalable solutions. Predictive scaling and intelligent automation reduce costs and ensure reliability, particularly during unpredictable traffic variations. Users implement it to maintain efficiency and minimize downtime, benefiting from features such as self-healing and health checks.

What are the key features of AWS Auto Scaling?

Automatic Scaling: Adjusts resources based on real-time demand metrics.
CloudWatch Integration: Seamless monitoring integration for efficient resource management.
Target Tracking: Maintains desired performance levels by adjusting resources as needed.
Scheduled Scaling: Pre-configure adjustments based on expected demand changes.
Self-Healing: Automatically replaces unhealthy instances to ensure maximum uptime.

What benefits should users expect from AWS Auto Scaling?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces cost by adjusting resources based on fluctuating demand.
Reliable Performance: Ensures consistent performance even with varying traffic levels.
Minimal Downtime: Automatically adapts to traffic changes to keep services running smoothly.
User-Friendly Interface: Simple operation with intuitive controls and configurations.
Flexibility: Supports a range of AWS services, adapting to different use cases and demands.

In industries with variable demand, AWS Auto Scaling is deployed to manage real-time traffic surges, ensuring efficient use of resources during periods such as events and festive seasons. Users grow dynamic environments while balancing costs and maintaining stability, integrating the tool with CI/CD processes for continuous and efficient deployment.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance is known for its user-friendly approach to network analysis and performance monitoring. It excels in real-time diagnostics, helping organizations quickly resolve network issues and optimize performance effortlessly.

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance focuses on comprehensive network troubleshooting and performance monitoring, assisting in identifying bottlenecks and analyzing applications. Real-time data collection and evaluation ensure IT infrastructure efficiency. With active monitoring of latency, jitter, and throughput, users maintain smooth operations across multiple sites and applications. While highly effective, improvements in data handling, protocol support, and dashboard aesthetics are suggested to enhance user experience.

What are the key features of Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance?

Flow Matrices: Advanced analysis of network paths and traffic distribution.
SQL and DNS Analysis: In-depth insights into database and domain queries for troubleshooting.
Bandwidth Assessment: Evaluation of network capacity and utilization for performance optimization.
Real-time TWAMP Monitoring: Tracks network performance using Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol.
Application Performance Modules: Monitors the performance of various applications and services.
Customizable Dashboards: Personalized views for tracking critical network metrics and trends.
PCAP Capturing: Detailed packet analysis using tools like Wireshark for deeper insights.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Intuitive design allowing users to swiftly diagnose network issues.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Enhanced visibility of network activity for better control.
Performance Efficiency: Optimization of throughput, reducing downtimes and improving service delivery.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances features and functionality with competitive pricing for better ROI.

In industries such as telecommunications and finance, where network reliability is crucial, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance offers critical network performance insights. It supports high-demand environments by providing data-driven decisions, ensuring infrastructures handle increased loads efficiently.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

T-Systems, Thomson Reuters, Bordeaux Metropole, CGI, Citadelle Regional Hospital Center, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Groupe BPCE, Group S, Splitpoint, Horus-Net, Audatex, Indexis, Province de Liège, EASI, Spie Batignolles, Faymonville

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

September 2026

Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.