AWS AppSync vs FME comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Safe Software are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Safe Software users who would recommend it.

AWS AppSync

Read 2 AWS AppSync reviews

887 Views
488 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FME

Read 7 FME reviews

3,094 Views
2,382 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS AppSync

FME

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS AppSync and FME based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS AppSync vs. FME Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS AppSync vs. FME

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS AppSync

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (20th)

FME

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (31st)

Featured Reviews

Akil Saji

AWS Cloud Developer at Mobil80 Solutions and Services Pvt. Ltd.

Ease of creating APIs with ongoing updates needed for automation

AWS has made it easy for developers like me to create and manage GraphQL APIs. The ease of use is a main advantage, allowing even beginners to start from scratch and learn through AppSync. Before AWS, developing and managing APIs was quite complex. AWS provided AppSync, which assists developers and startup founders. Startups blooming everywhere benefit from this service, welcoming those who lack prior knowledge. When working on AWS, I notice that Amazon regularly implements new features. For instance, with the Lambda service, AWS is transitioning from an old editor to a new one. Similarly, AppSync frequently introduces updates and changes. This trend is making the user interface more accessible, even for individuals without a technical background. Additionally, the cost is attractive, as AWS operates on a pay-as-you-go basis. These factors make AppSync both easy to use and cost-effective.

Read full review

Gert Booysen

Software Solutions Leader at GE Vernova

Extensive format support and reliable integration enhance data management while new pricing model requires reassessment

I haven't had any input or requirements from any customers that are not currently covered, so I don't have any additional needs that were identified or raised to me. Regarding pricing, with the model changes that they've implemented a while back, it actually made it more expensive to use, especially on the server side. They changed the licensing model, and that made customers think it is overpriced. Some customers were actually looking at alternatives. Pricing with the model changes was perceived negatively. I work primarily with enterprise customers, Vodacom, Eskom, so it's tier-one customers. For small customers, this solution is a bit too expensive. They don't really use it and just do direct integration on smaller implementations. This is basically used by tier-one customers. FME is still able to save time and money for clients. It's still a good investment. Regarding similar products to FME, GE developed a product called Data Fabric. That is a real-time operational integration platform, Data Fabric Network Connect, which is a GE Grid OS product. It is actually more expensive than FME, but the purpose is different as it's operational. The vendor in this case is GE, and it's a company that we bought that used to be called Greenbird. In current use scenarios, FME is still leading compared to Data Fabric. The GE product has a different application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Support for multiple data sources and formats is a fantastic feature."

"AWS has made it easy for developers like me to create and manage GraphQL APIs."

"FME's features that I have found most valuable are that it has a very friendly user interface, you don't need to use a lot of code, it has a lot of connectors and few forms, and it has a strong facial aspect that can do a lot of facial analysis."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"From my reseller perspective, the best features in FME are the ease of operation and the fact that it works."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"FME is spatially aware and understands how to deal with the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

More FME pros

Cons

"Moving to other clouds is impossible without significantly rearchitecting your applications."

"In AppSync, assigning roles and permissions to APIs is necessary for accessing other AWS services. Automating this task when creating APIs would be beneficial."

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"We are looking at the possibility of using Glue instead of FME, using the native AWS product."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"FME is a great tool, but I don't know if we can scale it up since the prices are high and we would need to convince the decision makers to provide more budget."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis, and it is a pay-as-you-go model."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

18%

Healthcare Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Hospitality Company

Government

28%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS AppSync?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good and easy. About the pricing and setup cost, there is no major setup cost required for AWS AppSync, which is a really great thing becau...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS AppSync?

The current features of AWS AppSync are enough for any developer, but it has some areas for improvement. AWS AppSync can provide first-class support for SQL RDS since writing SQL via VTL is clunky ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS AppSync?

My main use case for AWS AppSync is to deploy the application by connecting my frontend and backend application. AWS AppSync serves as a GraphQL API Gateway that sits between my frontend and backen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FME?

The use cases for FME are mainly integration to the GE Smallworld product. GE Smallworld is a GE product, and we are using it to integrate with other third-party products into GE Smallworld and ADM...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering FME?

The overall rating for FME is eight out of ten, and I prefer the feedback to be anonymous. My job title is Senior Solutions Architect.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zapier vs AWS AppSync

Compared 25% of the time

AWS Glue vs AWS AppSync

Compared 21% of the time

Perspectium DataSync vs AWS AppSync

Compared 18% of the time

Workato vs AWS AppSync

Compared 15% of the time

CData Connect Cloud vs AWS AppSync

Compared 13% of the time

More AWS AppSync Competitors

SSIS vs FME

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 5% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs FME

Compared 5% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs FME

Compared 5% of the time

More FME Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

May 2026

Download AWS AppSync product report

Buyer's Guide

FME

May 2026

Download FME product report

Also Known As

AppSync

No data available

Overview

AWS AppSync is a managed service that simplifies application development by providing real-time data synchronization and offline capabilities. It's ideal for building scalable applications with GraphQL APIs, unlocking seamless communication between the cloud and client apps.

AWS AppSync offers a robust platform for developers looking to craft apps that require real-time updates and efficient data management. By integrating GraphQL API creation, it allows applications to fetch only necessary data, optimizing both performance and user experience. With its serverless architecture, developers can focus on building core functionalities without worrying about infrastructure or scalability. This streamlines the development process, making AWS AppSync an excellent choice for modern applications.

What are the essential features of AWS AppSync?

Real-time Data Sync: Enables real-time data updates, ensuring data consistency across all devices.
GraphQL API: Simplifies data querying by allowing clients to request only the needed data, optimizing application performance.
Offline Support: Provides offline access and data synchronization, catering to users with intermittent connectivity.
Scalability: Automatically scales the infrastructure to accommodate varying loads, relieving developers of manual scaling tasks.
Security: Includes built-in authentication and authorization mechanisms using AWS Cognito and other providers.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from AWS AppSync?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure management costs through its serverless model, allowing pay-as-you-go pricing
Improved Performance: Enhances application responsiveness with efficient data querying and real-time capabilities
Developer Productivity: Boosts productivity by letting developers focus on business logic instead of infrastructure maintenance
Enhanced User Experience: Provides users with seamless app interactions, even during offline periods

In industries like e-commerce and healthcare, AWS AppSync implementation enhances features such as inventory tracking and patient data management. By facilitating real-time updates and secure data transactions, AppSync empowers businesses to deliver reliable, customer-centric experiences tailored to industry demands.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

FME is a powerful tool designed for efficient geospatial data handling, supporting over 400 file formats and integrating with diverse systems. Its intuitive interface facilitates seamless automation of workflows, making it ideal for sectors that manage large spatial data volumes.

With FME, businesses automate data flows and manage GIS data transfers while integrating with tools like GE Smallworld. It empowers users with self-service capabilities for data processing and real-time event management. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement such as better mapping presentations, simpler loops, and more guidance on geographical transformations. Pricing remains a consideration for some markets. However, FME is a robust solution for massive data transformations, network infrastructure management, and automation of data quality control, especially in governmental contexts.

What are FME's key features?

Spatial Capabilities: Efficient handling of geospatial data through triggers and automation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with FME Flow, FME Form, and scripting languages like Python.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies data transformation and debugging without extensive coding.
Format Support: Over 400 file formats ensure wide-ranging compatibility.
System Integration: Connects with numerous systems, preferred for large spatial data volumes.

What benefits should users consider?

Automation: Streamlines workflows and reduces manual intervention.
Efficiency: Handles large datasets effectively, optimizing data operations.
Cost-Effectiveness: Despite pricing concerns, offers significant functionality for data processing.
Self-Service Capabilities: Enables users to manage and transform data independently.
Real-Time Processing: Supports real-time event handling for dynamic environments.

FME is widely adopted across industries that require precise geospatial data management such as government agencies needing to automate and control data processes efficiently or organizations handling complex network infrastructures that engage in frequent GIS data transfers. Its capacity for seamless integration with various systems enables practical use for extensive data transformations and automation, increasing operational efficiency in data-intensive sectors.

Safe Software

Sample Customers

ACBL, Puresec, IDT, ASU, Public Good, cookpad, ALDO, ticketmaster

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Buyer's Guide

AWS AppSync vs. FME

April 2026

Free Report: AWS AppSync vs. FME

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS AppSync vs. FME and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS AppSync vs. FME report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.