Avantra vs Centreon comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Avantra and Centreon are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Avantra is ranked #54, while Centreon is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.7. Avantra holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Centreon’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Avantra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Centreon users who would recommend it.

Avantra

Read 5 Avantra reviews

6,283 Views
3,142 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,361 Views
6,646 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Avantra

Centreon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Avantra offer IT monitoring solutions, competing in comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities. Avantra's robust features may justify its higher price point, primarily in SAP environments, whereas Centreon is noted for cost-effectiveness, catering broadly to diverse IT infrastructures.

Features: Centreon provides real-time performance dashboards, customizable alert systems, and comprehensive monitoring. Avantra excels in automation, SAP system-specific monitoring, and reduced manual interventions, making it ideal for SAP-heavy environments.

Room for Improvement: Centreon could enhance predictive metrics and reduce manual configurations. Avantra may benefit from simplifying its complex setup and expanding its support versatility beyond SAP-focused customer service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon boasts straightforward deployment backed by detailed documentation and active technical support. Avantra offers efficient deployment suited to large enterprises, especially those using SAP, though its setup complexity can be challenging for some.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is known for lower initial setup costs and an appealing ROI due to efficient management of diverse IT environments. Avantra involves a higher investment but delivers substantial ROI through reduced downtime in SAP systems, making it ideal for specialized monitoring solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Avantra vs. Centreon Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Avantra vs. Centreon

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avantra

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

54th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (52nd), SAP Service Providers (11th), Server Monitoring (29th)

Centreon

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (23rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Avantra is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Centreon is 1.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.5%
Avantra	1.2%
Other	97.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Mani Velayudhan

Manager, SAP Basis at The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

Useful automation capabilities, scales well, and simple implementation

We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities. Looking ahead to future releases, I would like to see more advanced automation features. As a long-term goal, I am considering the possibility of automating SAP system upgrades. While this would not be an easy feat, advancements in technology may make it feasible in the future. Overall, a key feature I hope to see in future releases is increased automation capabilities.

Read full review

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can customize alerts based on need."

"I definitely recommend this solution, it provides good value for money."

"It prevented two major failures in our SAP production systems."

"Deployment was amazingly short and simple; I do not think I have seen any SAP-related product installs ready to work so fast, and out-of-box it included most of the functions and settings that we needed."

"It's just very user-friendly, and it's very easy to monitor the servers using Avantra."

"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."

"It's very easy to manage and use."

"Centreon allowed us to do it without having to look for another solution."

"We have the business activity monitoring, the map, and the MBI modules and they are all very good."

"My advice would be to go ahead with Centreon; don't waste time, go ahead."

"I really like the filtering capabilities of it. You can easily tell what's critical next to what's okay, the state of the services. It's very easy to get the whole picture quickly."

"If they have the same issues that we had, which means a lot of pollers spread across the whole infrastructure and no central view to look at the entire status with the need to manage everything together, then it is a good solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that most of its plug-ins are free."

"I find the product's scalability to be one of the most valuable features since it allows us to add unlimited devices for monitoring and to set up additional polling servers without additional license cost or downtime in our monitoring."

"It's a great product, it's very flexible."

More Centreon pros

Cons

"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."

"The dashboard needs to improve."

"The dashboard needs to improve; it's not so clear right now and we need it to be more usable so we can have all of our reports in one easy-to-access place."

"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."

"I think they can improve their UI, while very intuitive, I would like to see graphic updates."

"A downside of Avantra is that it comes with predefined values."

"Centreon is actually missing an easy way to create a trendline for the metrics. Actually it is possible to create it, but you need a good knowledge of math, Centreon, and RRD."

"Improvements I would like to see include a discovery solution, better reports, and end-to-end monitoring."

"This solution lacks service monitoring in the cloud."

"Centreon needs to improve the granularity of the data as well as the graphical data. It would also be better to if there was improvement to the filtering/grouping system as well as the creation of views."

"Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed."

"Response times can be slow, often leaving us to resolve basic issues in-house."

"I think Centreon's security could be improved by leveraging AI. That's where things are heading in the industry."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

More Centreon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"The pricing works out well for us, given our environment and where we are."

"For more complex tasks, we use prepaid support days and ask Centreon to come onsite."

"It is perfect and very cheap if you are a little company or startup. After that, it is quite expensive for a big company."

"Open-source solutions like this can be very cost effective for an organization looking for a product that they can quickly implement, as there is no initial cost and there are no license renewal fees. However, it is important to take into consideration some of the related costs that may come along as needed, such as training, support, and product enhancements."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

19%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Avantra

Compared 11% of the time

Datadog vs Avantra

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Avantra

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Avantra

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avantra

Compared 6% of the time

More Avantra Competitors

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avantra

October 2026

Download Avantra product report

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

October 2026

Download Centreon product report

Overview

Avantra is an industry-leading platform designed to automate SAP operations for enterprises. It optimizes SAP landscapes, ensuring efficient performance management to meet the demands of large-scale environments while reducing manual tasks.

Avantra automates SAP operations, providing tools that enhance efficiency and reliability. It assists enterprises with advanced monitoring, performance optimization, and predictive analytics, crucial for managing complex SAP landscapes. By integrating seamlessly with SAP environments, it offers comprehensive insights and automations that lead to improved operational control and reduced manual intervention. Businesses benefit significantly by bridging IT operations with business objectives, thereby facilitating more effective resource allocation and decision-making processes.

What are the key features of Avantra?

Automated Health Checks: Conducts daily system analysis for consistent performance tracking.
Predictive Monitoring: Uses AI for early detection of potential SAP issues to prevent downtime.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers a clear view of system performance with customizable metrics.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly fits into existing workflows with robust integrations.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation reduces the workload on IT teams, freeing up resources.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and resource wastage, leading to cost savings.
Improved Decision Making: Real-time data insights enable better strategic planning.
Enhanced Performance: Boosts system stability and enhances user satisfaction.

Avantra is particularly beneficial in industries with heavy reliance on SAP systems, such as manufacturing and finance. It helps streamline operations, providing rapid responsiveness to market changes and regulatory requirements, ensuring that businesses remain competitive and compliant in their respective fields.

Avantra

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Sample Customers

Migros, Strauss, Migros, LAM research, Deloitte, Deloitte, Kiewit

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Buyer's Guide

Avantra vs. Centreon

September 2026

Free Report: Avantra vs. Centreon

Find out what your peers are saying about Avantra vs. Centreon and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avantra vs. Centreon report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.