Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs Nolio Release Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation and Nolio Release Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Release Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. Nolio Release Automation Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It can support very complex environments and dependencies.""The product provides efficiency, in terms time, cost, and resources.""The capability to provide visibility to the stakeholders, to management, is the biggest piece that showcases what the solution is about.""I think on a day-to-day basis, it has increased the capacity to deploy. We don't have to wait for someone to do something.""The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure.""It provides a wonderful user interface which is easy to use.""It gives us good feedback on visualizations and on how our processes have progressed.""The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pros →

"One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames.""The graphical view of when you're writing flow is the most valuable feature.""The CA Application Insight feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

More Nolio Release Automation Pros →

Cons
"GUI for mobile phones: Availability to approve and start deployment through mobile phones.""I would like to see more support for WebSphere.""At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2.""The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform.""There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system.""There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them.""key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking.""If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Cons →

"The configuration of the solution is a bit difficult to maneuver. They should work to make it easier.""A concern with CA Release Automation is that Automic was acquired by CA recently. We're a bit concerned that CA strategy is going with Automic, that CA Release Automation is dead. They are not investing in it too much... They do say, that in the next two or three years we don't need to worry. They will still provide support for CA Release Automation. But we're not sure how CA Release Automation will evolve.""In the next release, I would like to see more features to use active directory. And more rules to support more Python scripts and to work with Kubernetes and clouds, to have an easy solution for a lot of parameters.""It could use better integration with development tools.""When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning."

More Nolio Release Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."
  • "I can save time and money more quickly."
  • "If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."
  • "Customers often complain about the price."
  • More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools."
  • More Nolio Release Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames.
    Top Answer:Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools. The pricing could be cheaper. In our organization, we've been using it for… more »
    Top Answer:When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning. There's also not many instructional materials and videos on… more »
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    358
    Comparisons
    287
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    12th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    689
    Comparisons
    376
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    765
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform
    CA Release Automation
    Learn More
    Overview

    Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

    Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

    CA Release Automation enables you to seamlessly connect the continuous delivery ecosystem to deliver high-quality applications faster than ever before. With this enterprise-ready solution, you can accelerate and stabilize application deployments from development to test to production. Its advanced capabilities can help you plan, manage and optimize the continuous delivery pipeline to improve release quality and efficiency. With CA Release Automation, get automated, agile release management that’s ready to work in your IT world.

    Sample Customers
    BET365, Charter Communications, TASC
    CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco. Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm36%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Transportation Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm41%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Insurance Company14%
    Hospitality Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm57%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Hospitality Company4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise82%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise88%
    Buyer's Guide
    Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. Nolio Release Automation
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. Nolio Release Automation and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 17th in Release Automation while Nolio Release Automation is ranked 12th in Release Automation with 50 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 8.0, while Nolio Release Automation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation writes "Reduces our time to market considerably with automated and consistent results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nolio Release Automation writes " Enables one-touch application deployment across various environments". Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy, whereas Nolio Release Automation is most compared with GitLab, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Chef and Microsoft Azure DevOps. See our Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. Nolio Release Automation report.

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.