We performed a comparison between Automation Anywhere (AA) and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Automation Anywhere includes IQ Bots. So, IQ Bots is the key part of Automation Anywhere. You can work on any type of PDF, images, invoices, or billing things in any company. You can just upload it and extract the data, then use it as you require. It is a key part of Automation Anywhere: the best part."
"Easy to access: Without the need to download and install software on a local machine, we can access the RPA application from virtually anywhere."
"There are ready plugins and connectors to integrate with APIs for common systems like Oracle or Microsoft."
"By using this solution for RPA, we can automate a lot of business processes, which helps achieve less time to market."
"AA has improved our digital strategy extensively and provided the required leverage to place ourselves above other peers in the O&G Industry. We were able to develop quick digital solutions by demonstrating the ROI and gain momentum by aligning the desired resources & budget from leadership."
"It helps with the speed on improving processes and the results of those processes."
"It has drag-and-drop features, which makes it very fast for us to gather the required data."
"The biggest benefit of Automation Anywhere is that it makes our processes error-free. Accuracy is how you build efficiency within the system and increase productivity."
"The testing solution produces the best web applications."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is its online community support, which is comprehensive and easy to access."
"Due to its popularity, you can find pretty much any answer in open discussions from the community."
"Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems."
"I like that it is a robust and free open source. There is a lot of community support available, and there are a lot of developers using them. There's good community support."
"Since Selenium HQ has multiple plug-ins, we can use it with multiple tools and multiple languages."
"What I like about Selenium HQ is that we wrote it ourselves. I think it's perfect. It's a framework that you can use to devise your own products, which is nice."
"Selenium web driver - Java."
"In the debugging mode, it writes all the logs to text files, but it doesn't ever clean them up. We had one that got to 200K, and it bogged our whole machine down. We couldn't figure out what was going on until we found out that we had a 200K file sitting out there. We would like some sort of maintenance on the log files going forward."
"New versions keep coming up. The challenge for us is to have the downtime to do the migrations. This could be improved upon. We would like fewer version changes and upgrades happening to the application. While the downtime is not that much, depending on the business processes, there are times few critical processes are running on a daily or hourly basis. We would expect the downtime to be even less for them."
"Automation Anywhere is a technical application. It is not so easy for a regular user. It requires technical knowledge."
"They could improve the environmental stabilizing issues. There are a lot of environmental issues when rolling over from one environment to another, higher environment. This is the one thing they definitely need to look into."
"The Automation Anywhere Control room component features can be improved, as of now it contains too many roles and rules which makes it confusing to use it."
"Automation Anywhere should make it easier for developers to manage queues and exception handling. The OCR component could also be better. We have had to use other OCR tools to get information from the account documents."
"Automation Anywhere's UI is difficult. Its user interface can be improved."
"One of the challenges that I face every now and then while working with A2019, is around the bot agent updates. Every week/alternate weeK, I receive an error while running my bots, that asks me to update the bot agent."
"It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly."
"I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers."
"Selenium HQ can be complex. The interface requires a QA engineer or an expert to use it."
"Technical support isn't very good. Sometimes their recommendations were not very clear."
"I would like for the next release to support parallel testing."
"You need to have experience in order to do the initial setup."
"I would like to see automatic logs generated."
"Handling frames and windows needs to be improved."
Automation Anywhere (AA) is ranked 3rd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 485 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Regression Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Automation Anywhere (AA) is rated 8.4, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Automation Anywhere (AA) writes "Automation Co-Pilot enables us to present details from CRM for business management on one page". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". Automation Anywhere (AA) is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and WorkFusion, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText UFT One. See our Automation Anywhere (AA) vs. Selenium HQ report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.