• Home
  • AuraQuantic vs. OpenText MBPM

AuraQuantic vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AuraQuantic Logo

AuraQuantic

Read 6 AuraQuantic reviews
606 views|444 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews
443 views|259 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
AuraQuantic vs. OpenText MBPM
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AuraQuantic vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Emilio Valle
Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable
Jaideep MS
A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's a low-code application.""AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible.""AuraPortal has the best price for its process.""AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."

More AuraQuantic Pros →

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

More OpenText MBPM Pros →

Cons
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved.""We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example.""More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help.""One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."

More AuraQuantic Cons →

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM.""There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

More OpenText MBPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price could be better. It's quite expensive."

    • More AuraQuantic Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

    • More OpenText MBPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about AuraQuantic?
    Top Answer:It's a low-code application.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AuraQuantic?
    Top Answer:I do not handle the licensing. I do not have direct knowledge of the pricing. It's not within the scope of my work.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with AuraQuantic?
    Top Answer:We're just using images. We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example. There could be more adoptions. We'd like the option to connect this product with other… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText MBPM?
    Top Answer:On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with OpenText MBPM?
    Top Answer:There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part. However, support is a major area that needs improvement. In general, the technical documentation isn't available to start with… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for OpenText MBPM?
    Top Answer:We use OpenText MBPM for business process management and vendor invoice management. There are a lot of other variations as well. So we don't just use it for automation. Primarily, we get information… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ranking
    18th
    out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
    Views
    606
    Comparisons
    444
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    10.0
    41st
    out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
    Views
    443
    Comparisons
    259
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Appian logo
    Appian vs. AuraQuantic
    Compared 46% of the time.
    Camunda logo
    Camunda vs. AuraQuantic
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Bizagi vs. AuraQuantic
    Compared 18% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    IBM BPM vs. AuraQuantic
    Compared 12% of the time.
    More AuraQuantic Competitors   →
    Camunda logo
    Camunda vs. OpenText MBPM
    Compared 100% of the time.
    More OpenText MBPM Competitors   →
    Also Known As
    Metastorm BPM
    Learn More
    AuraQuantic
    OpenText
    Overview

    AuraQuantic is a digital platform designed for business users to easily and rapidly build unlimited processes and applications to automate end-to-end operations, reducing costs and optimizing productivity.

    AuraQuantic is a no-code platform for building the enterprise solutions that drive Digital Transformation.

    Interface

    Delight users with attractive interfaces across multiple devices and deliver the best user experience. Respond immediately to their ever-changing needs with the agility provided by the platform and its no-code changes on the fly.

    Logic

    This is the most powerful part of any application. This is why AuraQuantic offers a long list of built-in, no-code functionalities.

    Data

    To manage application and process data models, AuraQuantic provides a visual data model designer and supports importing data schemas.

    Application Governance

    Access rights management (to apps and app development), Application metadata collection, Application performance monitoring, Application works dashboard, Custom ‘guardrails’ for practitioners/developers, Role-based access control to data and services for app dev, Multiple practitioners/developers for a single app and across the platform.


    Business Analytics

    Digital Decisioning features aim to inform and automate operational decisions. These decisions continue to increase in amount and complexity due to growing customer demands. Business decision automation is a must to keep up with ever-changing customer needs.

    Thanks to business activity data collection, using custom applications built with AuraQuantic, the organization is empowered to carry out accurate analysis and act smart by leveraging business insights.

    Connectivity

    API REST, API SOAP, API DLL
    Exposing APIs (process/application logic and decision systems)
    Connector builder
    REST and SOAP web services connector
    External database connectors (Adapters Servers, scripts and stored procedures execution)
    .Net Assembly connector Connectors with Artificial Intelligence services (AI)
    Robotic Process Automation (RPA) service connectors
    More built-in connectors (50+)
    Microsoft Office 365, Google Suite, SAP…

    OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.
    Sample Customers
    Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
    Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government15%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company11%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    AuraQuantic vs. OpenText MBPM
    April 2024
    Free Report: AuraQuantic vs. OpenText MBPM
    Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our AuraQuantic vs. OpenText MBPM report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.