AuditBoard vs Axonius comparison

AuditBoard and Axonius are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. AuditBoard is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Axonius is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5. AuditBoard holds a 5.7% mindshare in IVRM, compared to Axonius’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Axonius users who would recommend it.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

838 Views
438 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Axonius

Read 6 Axonius reviews

43 Views
26 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

Axonius

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Axonius and AuditBoard compete in IT management and governance solutions. Axonius holds an advantage in cybersecurity due to its asset management and integration features, while AuditBoard excels in audit and risk management.

Features: Axonius offers automated security policy validation, an extended integration network, and asset management for improved cybersecurity. AuditBoard provides streamlined workflows, real-time workpaper editing, and centralized document management for audit efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Axonius could enhance its query customization, expand its integration list beyond API connectivity, and simplify its user interface. AuditBoard could refine its community tools, improve reporting customizability, and streamline external auditor access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axonius is praised for minimal setup time and robust technical support, benefiting from its integration flexibility. AuditBoard's deployment emphasizes comprehensive user onboarding and support, with a well-structured training program.

Pricing and ROI: Axonius requires a substantial initial fee for its features, offering ROI through enhanced security and visibility. AuditBoard's pricing is optimized for those focusing on governance, yielding ROI through process efficiency and compliance enhancement.

To learn more, read our detailed AuditBoard vs. Axonius Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Axonius

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (6th)

Axonius

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 5.7%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Axonius is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Gopichand Rajbhar

IT GRC Manager at Capgemini

User-friendly, simple to implement, and has lots of features

There are lots of features. We like the reviewer and auditor, where they support you if you want to upload evidence. At the same time the reviewer or auditor can also put their remark. The solution is user-friendly. It's easy to set up. You can easily find out how to proceed for reassessment, how to upload that evidence, and how you can put in a remark. Everything is a single console where you can easily track what you need. It's stable. The product is scalable. They provide a demo to customers to allow them to explore the tools.

Read full review

Ashok Gunnia

Sr. IT Automation Technical Consultant at IBM

Integrates with ServiceNow and provides alerts for deviations

The most valuable feature of Axonius is its ability to deduplicate records and identify which ones are old and stale versus those more relevant. For example, if you haven't logged in today but a system somewhere else mentions you have, Axonius can detect this through various logs like Active Directory, file logging, or Wi-Fi connections. Traditionally, someone would have to make numerous calls and spend a lot of time to find out if you are on-site or connected to a Wi-Fi network. The tool simplifies this process. From my experience, onboarding and adding connectors was pretty easy, especially when integrating with the ServiceNow environment. It worked well for my use case, but the ease of use can depend on the customer's specific needs and what they are trying to achieve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the most significant elements of this solution are the out-of-the-box reporting, the ease of workflow, workflow management, and the ease of managing our audit process."

"Considering the solution's return on investment, it has been extremely helpful since we were doing a lot of documentation. Previously, in our company, we were using an Excel sheet which made things quite messy."

"The most significant feature of AuditBoard is its community tools. It provides an internal communication platform that enables users to communicate within the system rather than relying on external tools such as Outlook or Microsoft products. By communicating within the system, all interactions are centralized and accessible, promoting a streamlined workflow."

"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."

"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."

"For AuditBoard, the simple workflow made it very easy to code with the group."

"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."

"The most valuable feature is the well-documented instruction."

More AuditBoard pros

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

Cons

"Everything is there, and I have no disadvantage to note as of now."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

"The layout for the end user could be improved."

"It is not easy to analyze the results of a survey as a whole."

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

"They should improve the solution's test sheets feature for ease of use."

"The initial setup is somewhat difficult because it has multiple pieces that need to be stitched together. You have to integrate it with the business unit you want to test if you want to go down from the corporate level to the operational level."

More AuditBoard cons

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuditBoard?

It consolidates the E2E process in one single solution, and in a very user friendly environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AuditBoard?

I used AuditBoard primarily for risk assessment questionnaires in a very premature risk environment. I also have experience with IBM OpenPages, mostly for operational risk to track issues, to look ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions. And the amount of value they provide is really huge compared to other vendors. So, it’s based on the actual requirement and how you want ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features, like PCI DSS, and different dashboards that work with various compliances. For example, if a company follows ISO, they can create a da...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

We use it for reporting, noncompliance reporting, and identifying gaps. We use it for API monitoring within our company. And we also use it as a CMDB. Our security team, people within the SOC team,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 39% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 25% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs AuditBoard

Compared 22% of the time

LogicGate vs AuditBoard

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management vs AuditBoard

Compared 7% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 32% of the time

ServiceNow vs Axonius

Compared 20% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 10% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 9% of the time

Surface Command vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

April 2025

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

April 2025

Download Axonius product report

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

AuditBoard

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Axonius

April 2025

Free Report: AuditBoard vs. Axonius

Find out what your peers are saying about AuditBoard vs. Axonius and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuditBoard vs. Axonius report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.