AuditBoard vs Axonius comparison

AuditBoard and Axonius are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. AuditBoard is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Axonius is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. AuditBoard holds a 5.7% mindshare in IVRM, compared to Axonius’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Axonius users who would recommend it.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

2,234 Views
1,117 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Axonius

Read 8 Axonius reviews

3,398 Views
272 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

Axonius

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Axonius and AuditBoard compete in IT management and governance solutions. Axonius holds an advantage in cybersecurity due to its asset management and integration features, while AuditBoard excels in audit and risk management.

Features: Axonius offers automated security policy validation, an extended integration network, and asset management for improved cybersecurity. AuditBoard provides streamlined workflows, real-time workpaper editing, and centralized document management for audit efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Axonius could enhance its query customization, expand its integration list beyond API connectivity, and simplify its user interface. AuditBoard could refine its community tools, improve reporting customizability, and streamline external auditor access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axonius is praised for minimal setup time and robust technical support, benefiting from its integration flexibility. AuditBoard's deployment emphasizes comprehensive user onboarding and support, with a well-structured training program.

Pricing and ROI: Axonius requires a substantial initial fee for its features, offering ROI through enhanced security and visibility. AuditBoard's pricing is optimized for those focusing on governance, yielding ROI through process efficiency and compliance enhancement.

To learn more, read our detailed AuditBoard vs. Axonius Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Axonius

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (5th)

Axonius

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 5.7%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Axonius is 1.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Axonius	1.8%
AuditBoard	5.7%
Other	92.5%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2562750

Vice President at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Streamlined workflow and enhanced simplicity with an easy setup

I used AuditBoard primarily for risk assessment questionnaires in a very premature risk environment. I also have experience with IBM OpenPages, mostly for operational risk to track issues, to look at risks and controls The collaboration within my team had not yet significantly changed since…

Read full review

Sakkemgari Tamagari

Director of cloud security at Nuxeo

Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response

I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the most significant elements of this solution are the out-of-the-box reporting, the ease of workflow, workflow management, and the ease of managing our audit process."

"The most significant feature of AuditBoard is its community tools. It provides an internal communication platform that enables users to communicate within the system rather than relying on external tools such as Outlook or Microsoft products. By communicating within the system, all interactions are centralized and accessible, promoting a streamlined workflow."

"Its ability to share the data in real-time has helped us well."

"The most valuable feature of AuditBoard is its ability to facilitate the editing of work papers in a seamless and efficient manner. This is achieved through a built-in tool that allows for real-time editing without the need for downloading the working paper. This feature has proven to be incredibly time-saving for me as it eliminates the step of having to download the file and make changes, instead providing an easy-to-access "edit work paper" option. Overall, this feature has greatly improved my experience with AuditBoard and has been a significant contributor to its success in my opinion."

"Considering the solution's return on investment, it has been extremely helpful since we were doing a lot of documentation. Previously, in our company, we were using an Excel sheet which made things quite messy."

"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."

"The solution is user-friendly, easy to set up, and provides a single console where you can easily track what you need, including how to proceed for reassessment, how to upload evidence, and how to put in a remark."

"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."

More AuditBoard pros

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

Cons

"It is not easy to analyze the results of a survey as a whole."

"AuditBoard could benefit from the addition of video capabilities, although it is not a necessity. Small companies that cannot afford licenses for Microsoft Teams or Zoom would benefit greatly from this feature, as it would enhance the communication process."

"Everything is there, and I have no disadvantage to note as of now."

"AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

"They should improve the solution's test sheets feature for ease of use."

More AuditBoard cons

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AuditBoard?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is recommended for smaller companies, particularly for its risk assessment module, which is simple and easy to use. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

I think I am good so far with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing; I do not see any disturbances there, but it is working well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My main use case for Axonius is config management and asset inventory. I use Axonius to maintain the asset inventory up to date and also to identify the owners quickly; these are the primary requir...

See all answers

Comparisons

Scytale vs AuditBoard

Compared 14% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 11% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 8% of the time

MetricStream vs AuditBoard

Compared 7% of the time

Thoropass vs AuditBoard

Compared 5% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 22% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 10% of the time

ServiceNow vs Axonius

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Axonius

Compared 7% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 7% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

March 2026

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

March 2026

Download Axonius product report

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

AuditBoard

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Axonius

March 2026

Free Report: AuditBoard vs. Axonius

Find out what your peers are saying about AuditBoard vs. Axonius and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuditBoard vs. Axonius report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.