IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Aruba Virtual Intranet Access vs Pulse Connect Secure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: 
The flexibility in their management is great.
Top Answer: 
Pulse Secure and Juniper are very expensive in their license cost. That's a drawback of this solution. The hardware is rather cheap, however, licensing is very, very, very expensive. You have… more »
Top Answer: 
We would like to see them be a bit more swift in the changes in the protocols and the browsers. They are lagging a bit behind. Certainly, for the Pulse Desktop Client, they should really work on the… more »
Ranking
Views
412
Comparisons
341
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
7,338
Comparisons
5,400
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
582
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Aruba VIA
Learn More
Overview

The Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) client from Aruba provides secure remote network connectivity for Android, Apple iOS, Mac OS X, Linux and Windows devices.

The Pulse Connect Secure enables you to give employees, partners, and customers secure and controlled access to your corporate data and applications including file servers, Web servers, native messaging and e-mail clients, hosted servers, and more from outside your trusted network using just a Web browser.
Offer
Learn more about Aruba Virtual Intranet Access
Learn more about Pulse Connect Secure
Sample Customers
VERISK
Axcient, Baloise Group, Cygate, Catholic University of America, Datec Inc, Revlon, Santa Monica Networks, 7-Eleven
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider22%
Educational Organization10%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider23%
Computer Software Company22%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
April 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Check Point and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: April 2022.
595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 29th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while Pulse Connect Secure is ranked 8th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 0.0, while Pulse Connect Secure is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pulse Connect Secure writes "Easy to set up with flexible management and good network resources". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, OpenVPN Access Server and Check Point Remote Access VPN, whereas Pulse Connect Secure is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiClient, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.