Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Instant On Switches vs Juniper QFabric comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Juniper are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Juniper is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 10.2% mindshare in LS, compared to Juniper’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.
Aruba Instant On Switches
Read 29 Aruba Instant On Switches reviews
  • 1,910 Views
  • 965 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Juniper QFabric
Read 10 Juniper QFabric reviews
  • 253 Views
  • 165 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Juniper QFabric and Aruba Instant On Switches target organizations seeking efficient network solutions. Aruba Instant On Switches have an edge due to cost-effectiveness and simplicity.

Features: Juniper QFabric offers high scalability, robust performance, and advanced networking capabilities supporting extensive data centers. It integrates well with automation tools and provides reliable CLI interfaces. Aruba Instant On Switches focus on user-friendly interfaces, zero-touch deployment, and cloud management solutions, making them ideal for small and medium businesses. Their management systems support GUI control, which simplifies configuration and monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Juniper QFabric could enhance its ease of deployment and reduce complexity for users without advanced technical knowledge. Increased compatibility with other vendor products and streamlined management tools might also be beneficial. Aruba Instant On Switches could improve diagnostic features and expand capabilities to better serve larger enterprises. Advancements in security features and support for more advanced networking protocols would be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Instant On Switches provide straightforward installation processes supported by comprehensive customer service and clear installation guides. Juniper QFabric, although offering scalable solutions for large networks, requires specialized knowledge for deployment and may involve complex setup processes, necessitating more expert customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper QFabric typically involves higher initial costs but supports long-term growth with its extensive features and scalability, suitable for large enterprises. Aruba Instant On Switches offer lower costs and quicker ROI, focusing on affordable pricing structures and reduced operational expenses, which are advantageous for small to medium-sized setups.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Juniper QFabric Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Juniper QFabric
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant On Switches
Ranking in LAN Switching
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Juniper QFabric
Ranking in LAN Switching
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Switches is 10.2%, up from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper QFabric is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
LAN Switching
 

Featured Reviews

MashukThakur - PeerSpot reviewer
A centrally managed switches ideal for small and medium businesses but does not have any console access
The solution does not have any console access. For example, if you do not have internet access on your side and you need to configure anything, you should at least have CLI access to do something or manage the solution to put to some IP. It will only work if we have a TSCT on the network. We can port and configure the initial settings before we get the Instant On Switches. I am not working deeply on Instant On devices. I have only installed it in a couple of accommodation sites. Even today, one customer has ordered to install 80 pieces of Instant On. I’ve to order additional 94 access points. I was confused about whether to go with Aruba Instant On or AP-505. Instant On has limited accessibility but AP-505 have cloud or local access on normal infrastructure. This would be better and easier to configure. So, there are further improvements in regard to console access and some limitations with access.
Read full review
Suresh Pathipatti - PeerSpot reviewer
Performs well, is easy to set up, and the vendor maintains the product well
QFabric is the core switch. We also have two Brocade switches for the Fibre level The product works fine. It is an excellent product. There are different element systems and different options for each generation of the tool. We maintain the data center and analyze issues. I have no negative…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Setup is easy."
"We use Aruba Instant On Switches for general communication, sending files, and going to the internet."
"The stability is fine. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. Almost a ten on a ten."
"The best thing about Aruba Instant On Switches is their cost."
"The solution's most beneficial feature is that you obtain A-class equipment for the lowest price."
"Its customer service is good."
"Instant On Switches' best feature is the 1930, which is stackable."
"The solution is plug-and-play and auto-configured."
More Aruba Instant On Switches pros
"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."
"The 40 gig backbone InterConneX was valuable for our use case. It is even faster now. QFabric has spine-leaf technology or topology, which basically makes every single hop only one hop away in terms of connecting from one device to another. It is a pretty good and robust solution. It works pretty well in terms of scalability, and their technical support is amazing."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the fabric backplane having upwards of 160 GB of communication. It is a top-of-the-rack solution where you have your directors sitting in the main area and then you have your nodes expanded out to your multiple cabinets. It has a very good design and could be your server backbone."
"It is known for being agile, flexible, and cost-effective when working with various vendors."
"The vendor maintains the product well."
"Juniper QFabric has various advantages including scalability, simplicity, performance, and flexibility."
"QFabric supports redundancy and includes all of the enterprise and service provider features that customers would want in data center or service provider network."
More Juniper QFabric pros
 

Cons

"It could have an MSP portal version."
"Some L3 features could be included in the solution."
"They don't have a lot of diagnostics tools, which could be an area for improvement."
"In the next version, they should add a firewall from a single source."
"Room for improvement would be if they consolidated administration from multiple locations."
"Some models need enhancement of the web interface to make management and monitoring easier."
"The product must be integrated with Aruba Central for better management."
"In general, mostly in Instant On series, if we could have much more control on the switches, at least. We'd like a CLI access so that, when we want to do some advanced configurations we could."
More Aruba Instant On Switches cons
"They are working on the virtualization of the actual fabric layer. They are moving away from the original spine-leaf design to a different infrastructure. Instead of having three tiers, which was the director of the interconnected nodes, they cut them back, and they still have that kind of structure."
"The stability needs to be improved."
"I do not use GUI's very much for switch stacks. I am always in the CLI. However, I do know that Juniper in the past has lacked on their GUI's, but they have been working on it."
"It works too much on rebooting and there is some memory leakage."
"Improvements could be made to QFabric's life cycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support."
"Having support for all OpenFlow versions would be beneficial."
"The pricing structure could be more budget-friendly."
"It would be nice if Juniper provided the system integrator with training, similar to that of Cisco."
More Juniper QFabric cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite low compared to other products, which is good for the customer."
"Pricing is competitive, and there are no supplementary fees."
"The pricing is cheap."
"Aruba Instant On Switches is not expensive."
"I give the price seven out of ten."
"It is an expensive solution."
"We pay an annual licensing fee."
"The product has good pricing."
More Aruba Instant On Switches pricing and cost advice
"The price for Juniper QFabric could improve. There are subscription, maintenance, and add-on feature fees."
"The pricing is high."
"Juniper QFabric is a high-level solution but it could be less expensive."
"The price is relatively high, but it offers an advantage over its competitors by providing better performance and functionality."
"The pricing is high and it is possible to find better pricing option solutions on the market, but the licensing model is quite flexible."
"In terms of price, the QFabric solution is going to be probably in the middle of the road for a fabric solution."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Instant On Switches?
The solution has a simple deployment and zero border.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant On Switches?
I think the pricing for the switches is reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Aruba Instant On Switches?
I have run into a couple of problems with the switches. Recently, one of the newer stacks stopped working and had to be rebooted individually. They don't have a lot of diagnostics tools, which coul...
See all answers
What do you like most about Juniper QFabric?
The most valuable feature of QFabric for network performance is its stability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper QFabric?
Juniper QFabric is not overly expensive. Licensing is required for certain features like vRRP, but setting up a virtual chassis does not necessitate a separate license.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Juniper QFabric?
Improvements could be made to QFabric's lifecycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support. The rapid release cycle and short life span compared to comp...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

HPE ProCurve vs Aruba Instant On Switches Logo
HPE ProCurve vs Aruba Instant On Switches
Compared 48% of the time
Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Aruba Instant On Switches Logo
Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Aruba Instant On Switches
Compared 39% of the time
NETGEAR Switches vs Aruba Instant On Switches Logo
NETGEAR Switches vs Aruba Instant On Switches
Compared 13% of the time
More Aruba Instant On Switches Competitors
Cisco Nexus vs Juniper QFabric Logo
Cisco Nexus vs Juniper QFabric
Compared 64% of the time
Cisco FabricPath vs Juniper QFabric Logo
Cisco FabricPath vs Juniper QFabric
Compared 36% of the time
More Juniper QFabric Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Aruba Instant On Switches
April 2025
Aruba Instant On Switches reportDownload Aruba Instant On Switches product report
Buyer's Guide
LAN Switching
March 2025
Juniper QFabric reportDownload Juniper QFabric product report
 

Also Known As

Aruba Instant On 1930 Switches
QFabric
 

Overview

The Aruba Instant On 1930 switches features advanced, smart-managed, fixed configuration Gigabit switches designed for small businesses that are easy-to-deploy and affordable. They’re made to handle today’s bandwidth-heavy applications like voice and video conferencing, enabling consistent connectivity to enhance performance. Using either the Instant On mobile app or the cloud-based web portal, you can quickly set up, monitor and manage the 1930 switch series from anywhere at any time. What’s more, up to 30 W PoE power delivery is available out-of-the-box for your class 4 PoE devices, like access points, surveillance cameras and VoIP phones, all easily managed from the same platform.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Juniper QFabric System is composed of multiple components working together as a single switch to provide high-performance, any-to-any connectivity and management simplicity in the data center. The QFabric System flattens the entire data center network to a single tier where all access points are equal, eliminating the effects of network locality and making it the ideal network foundation for cloud-ready, virtualized data centers.The highly scalable QFabric System improves application performance with low latency and converged services in a nonblocking, lossless architecture that supports Layer 2, Layer 3, and Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) capabilities.
Juniper
 

Sample Customers

KEMET, Vestavia Hills City Schools, Dropbox
MCB Bank
Buyer's Guide
Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Juniper QFabric
April 2025
Free Report: Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Juniper QFabric
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Juniper QFabric and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Juniper QFabric report.
See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.