Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Airwave vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Management Applications category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1, while OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 3.8% mindshare in NMA, compared to OpenText’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Aruba Airwave
Read 26 Aruba Airwave reviews
  • 1,354 Views
  • 1,205 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Operations...
Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews
  • 766 Views
  • 161 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025
```html

Aruba Airwave and OpenText Network Operations Management are network management solutions, with Aruba Airwave having an edge in pricing and customer support while OpenText is notable for its extensive features.

Features: Aruba Airwave offers comprehensive network monitoring, simplified troubleshooting processes, and efficient management, making it suitable for businesses seeking streamlined operations. OpenText Network Operations Management focuses on advanced analytics and automation capabilities, providing a robust toolset for complex IT environments with a depth of features that surpasses Aruba's offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Airwave features a straightforward deployment model and effective customer service. OpenText Network Operations Management, although providing a thorough setup process, might require specialized knowledge. Aruba's simpler deployment and responsive support are beneficial for most companies, though OpenText offers extensive services for experienced teams.

Pricing and ROI: Aruba Airwave presents competitive pricing with a clear return on investment, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. OpenText Network Operations Management, despite a higher initial cost, delivers substantial long-term benefits through enhanced network efficiencies, making it a valuable option for organizations requiring advanced capabilities.

```
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Airwave vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Aruba Airwave vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Airwave
Ranking in Network Management Applications
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Network Operations...
Ranking in Network Management Applications
18th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (60th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Network Management Applications category, the mindshare of Aruba Airwave is 3.8%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Management Applications Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Aruba Airwave3.8%
OpenText Network Operations Management1.1%
Other95.1%
Network Management Applications
 

Featured Reviews

Edward Zeng - PeerSpot reviewer
Edward Zeng
Senior Network Engineer at Auckland University of Technology
Troubleshooting obstacles occur but technical support excels
My general opinion on Aruba Airwave is that it's acceptable, but it's not ideal because we are accustomed to Cisco. We didn't use Aruba much, but once you set it up, you probably don't need to worry about it too much. The version we are using is quite old now, probably around version four. I can't remember the version exactly because a lot of the products require Aruba Central, but we haven't used Aruba Central yet. I face challenges with Aruba Airwave, particularly with troubleshooting. When someone has a problem, we try troubleshooting, but the end-to-end users' messages show some details that are not always up-to-date, and sometimes the information from the GUI is not exactly aligned with what's on the website. If Aruba Airwave can apply AI capabilities, that would be even more perfect. I'd appreciate integration with Aruba Central; it would be great if they could incorporate it into Airwave.
Read full review
AhmedBahgat - PeerSpot reviewer
AhmedBahgat
Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company
Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable
The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Clarity feature makes it easy to use and understand what is going on with your network in a nice dashboard.​"
"It's scalable because it's licensed per device and we bought licenses with each device. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability."
"It has improved my organization by increasing troubleshooting opportunities which makes things more efficient."
"Aruba Airwave provides a robust solution for monitoring and configuring Wi-Fi networks."
"It can interact with other vendors better than Cisco, which is a good point of AirWave. It is easy to use, and its reporting is good."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"What I like best about Aruba Airwave is its orchestration feature because it saves configuration time. I also like that it allows you to do ZTP installations for new Aruba equipment."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its dashboard and simplicity."
More Aruba Airwave pros
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
 

Cons

"My general opinion on Aruba Airwave is that it's acceptable, but it's not ideal because we are accustomed to Cisco."
"When upgrading hardware, there were technical issues with network interfaces and Red Hat, which required escalation to developers."
"Pricing for Aruba Airwave could be cheaper, which is an area for improvement in the solution."
"The overall monitoring of this solution could be improved."
"I would try to integrate more products from different vendors in future releases. Because that's really good features that Aruba Airway has, but it's so limited."
"I would like to see an integration of services into one system, rather than having multiple systems to do multiple things."
"They should make it cheaper. By doing that, they can replace Cisco, which is also very expensive. If it is equivalent to Cisco in the features, with a reduced price, they can sell it more than Cisco."
"Cost is always a big issue for partners."
More Aruba Airwave cons
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is on an yearly basis."
"AirWave is a very expensive solution. If you implement it in a wide range network, it will cost a lot. There is no option to sell it outside that price segment, which is a problem."
"Licensing and pricing are extremely straightforward."
"Aruba Airwave's licensing cost is not that expensive."
"It's device-based licensing. One device requires one license."
"The cost is perfect because the devices have a lifetime warranty, and the licensing is good as well."
"This product is not expensive."
"It is an expensive solution."
More Aruba Airwave pricing and cost advice
"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Educational Organization
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise14
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Airwave?
I think the solution is quite affordable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Aruba Airwave?
They have other sensors which can manage and control all the sites. There is an IoT component where we can restrict internet services such as Facebook and YouTube. These things can also be managed....
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Aruba Airwave?
For Aruba Airwave, I am using the wireless devices for the Wi-Fi for the full company with access points. This is the top product I feel, and I see in the Gartner also. It is a good product and eas...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The price is reasonable based on the agreement.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Aruba Airwave Logo
Aruba ClearPass vs Aruba Airwave
Compared 21% of the time
Cisco DNA Center vs Aruba Airwave Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs Aruba Airwave
Compared 19% of the time
HPE Intelligent Management Center vs Aruba Airwave Logo
HPE Intelligent Management Center vs Aruba Airwave
Compared 13% of the time
Cisco Catalyst Center vs Aruba Airwave Logo
Cisco Catalyst Center vs Aruba Airwave
Compared 9% of the time
Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista vs Aruba Airwave Logo
Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista vs Aruba Airwave
Compared 8% of the time
More Aruba Airwave Competitors
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 42% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 31% of the time
ThousandEyes vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
ThousandEyes vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 27% of the time
More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Aruba Airwave
February 2026
Aruba Airwave reportDownload Aruba Airwave product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
January 2026
OpenText Network Operations Management reportDownload OpenText Network Operations Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Network Operations Management
 

Overview

Offering granular visibility into wired and wireless networks, AirWave is the only management platform designed with mobile devices and apps in mind. By proactively monitoring the health and performance of all things connected, AirWave lets IT gain the insights they need to support the digital workplace.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Henkel, University of Findlay, University of Minnesota Duluth, University of Iowa
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Aruba Airwave vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
February 2026
Free Report: Aruba Airwave vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Airwave vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Aruba Airwave vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.