Arista Networks Platform vs Juniper QFX Series Switches comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Arista Logo
6,388 views|4,935 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Juniper Logo
1,669 views|1,383 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Arista Networks Platform and Juniper QFX Series Switches based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Center Networking solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Arista Networks Platform vs. Juniper QFX Series Switches Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.""The most valuable aspect of Arista Networks products is their ease of configuration, especially when compared to Cisco products. When we implement advanced features for data centers such as BGP EVPN and VXLAN, Arista's configuration process is similar to that of Cisco's process, but at the same time it is simply much easier, clearer, and more understandable.""Arista Networks Platform is comfortable, easy to deploy, and easy to manage, with non-blocking technology. Additionally, it has a useful CloudVision platform and automation capabilities.""The best part is the single operating system that they have. Regardless of your model, it's the same operating system functioning across the board, which means you don't have to worry about backward compatibilities between your older switches and the new ones that you deploy.""The user-friendly policy manager lets us apply different controls for various user groups easily.""It's an extremely reliable platform for the network switches we use.""They support open standard features.""What we like most is its performance to price ratio."

More Arista Networks Platform Pros →

"Juniper QFX Series Switches provide a good platform for all of our hardware and are easy to use.""The most valuable features are the VxLAN and the EVPN.""The QFX series is a good choice for large data centers, particularly for Spine-Leaf architectures.""EVPN-VXLAN feature offers the most benefits.""It's a stable solution.""It's really easy to replicate rules. It's the one that I've used; it was CLI-based. You can implement a large set of rules with CLI. You can just copy a script and add additional changes to the source and destination on the part. And so it's easy to do large zone-based rules."

More Juniper QFX Series Switches Pros →

Cons
"A smoother transition between ISPs during failover would improve the user experience by reducing unnecessary notifications and interruptions.""My company does face issues in terms of interoperability when it comes to the product, making it an area that needs to be fixed.""The intent-based networking management, together with the provider of these solutions that are already free, would be beneficial.""The solution needs to improve their product range.""Its price can be better.""Arista Networks Platform should focus on improving the compatibility or integration with Cisco solutions.""I want the solution to include a unified controller.""The solution’s pricing could be better."

More Arista Networks Platform Cons →

"The price could be cheaper.""I faced issues with the deployment and upgrade. In the QFX5110 series, features like ISSU and DSSQ should be improved. Upgrades should be smoother.""Integrating QFX switches was the first point of challenge.""There have been some issues sometimes. When you upgrade the device, it doesn't come up. It gets stuck.""There is room for improvement in the pricing model. It is too high."

More Juniper QFX Series Switches Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is pretty pricey for a networking platform. It is on par with Cisco."
  • "Cost wise, Arista Networks Platform is more expensive than other networking solutions."
  • "Arista is very expensive. Not everybody is in a position to spend $70,000 to $80,000 for one switch."
  • "The price of the Arista Networks Platform could be less expensive for the hardware and license."
  • "There is an annual license required to use the Arista Networks Platform."
  • "Specific tools definitely require a license for the subscription. But we are not using these tools in our environment. In terms of licensing, you need to spend approximately $10,000 per month."
  • "I remember that when our customers were offered the Arista Networks Platform, they used a checklist to compare the prices between Arista and Cisco for their requirements, and found that the prices were almost the same."
  • "I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten where ten is high price and one is low price."
  • More Arista Networks Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of Juniper QFX Series Switches is expensive because we are running some enterprise hardware. However, they are less expensive than Cisco or HPE hardware."
  • "The cost is expensive."
  • "The solution is cheap, especially compared to competitors like Cisco."
  • More Juniper QFX Series Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Center Networking solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:Arista Networks Platform was cheaper than Cisco. I have heard that the product is affordable for enterprise-sized companies.
    Top Answer:The product fails to offer functions related to cloud orchestration, making it in areas where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:EVPN-VXLAN feature offers the most benefits.
    Top Answer:The solution is cheap, especially compared to competitors like Cisco.
    Top Answer:Integrating the QFX switches was the first point of challenge, particularly aligning them with our data center's architecture. I also had challenge with scalability.
    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    6,388
    Comparisons
    4,935
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    467
    Rating
    8.5
    6th
    Views
    1,669
    Comparisons
    1,383
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    7000 Series
    Learn More
    Overview

    Arista Networks Platform is a stable and reliable solution for data center features, specifically for non-blocking switches used for spine-leaf connectivity with servers hooked to these switches. It also provides multi-layer switches for client networks, particularly in the banking sector. 

    Arista products are preferred for their stability, good hardware, ease of adoption and configuration, responsive and helpful support, and high throughput ratings. The solution has helped prevent screen loss and business outages in the media industry and is designed for next-generation data centers.

    QFX Series Switches deliver industry-leading throughput and scalability, an extensive routing stack, the open programmability of the Junos OS, and a broad set of EVPN-VXLAN and IP fabric capabilities. With QFX, you’ll find premier solutions for data center spine-and-leaf, campus distribution, core, and data center gateway and interconnect switching.

    Rethink data center operations and fabric management with turnkey Juniper Apstra software in your QFX Series environment. You can automate the entire network lifecycle to simplify design and deployment and provide closed-loop assurance. With Apstra, customers have achieved 90% faster time to deployment, 70% faster time to resolution, and 83% OpEx reduction.


    Sample Customers
    American Internet Services
    Linode, VPRO, West Chester University
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Healthcare Company17%
    Consumer Goods Company17%
    Government17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    University7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Arista Networks Platform vs. Juniper QFX Series Switches
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Arista Networks Platform vs. Juniper QFX Series Switches and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Arista Networks Platform is ranked 2nd in Data Center Networking with 21 reviews while Juniper QFX Series Switches is ranked 6th in Data Center Networking with 6 reviews. Arista Networks Platform is rated 8.6, while Juniper QFX Series Switches is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Arista Networks Platform writes "Affordable for enterprise-sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper QFX Series Switches writes "Offers high port density, including 1/25G/40G/100G and 400 options upto 2 RU and lower power consumption and leverages Broadcom chipsets for enhanced performance". Arista Networks Platform is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Cisco Nexus, Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches, Aruba Switches and Cisco Ethernet Switches, whereas Juniper QFX Series Switches is most compared with Cisco Nexus, PTX Series Routers and Juniper MX Series Universal Routing Platforms. See our Arista Networks Platform vs. Juniper QFX Series Switches report.

    See our list of best Data Center Networking vendors.

    We monitor all Data Center Networking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.