We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and Bonita based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Features like SAP SolMan sync, Alfabet EA integration (another Software AG product)."
"The whole ARIS BPM solution is a bit special, because from the very beginning it was targeted more to Business users and the Management."
"Aris BPA has a lot of tools that are more professional than Bizagi."
"It helps to maintain a single source of truth regarding the processes followed within an organization."
"The most valuable feature in the latest versions is the connect portal, where you can do very simple modeling using the web-based portal."
"It has helped me get some ideas across more clearly to my colleagues."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the solution to fully customize the methodology according to the company's needs, and to enforce that methodology with features like filters, semantic checks, and reports."
"The stability of the ARIS BPM platform is quite good. The nice thing about it is the central database, where we can use all of our data. We can even manage users."
"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."
"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."
"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."
"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."
"The user interface is easy to use."
"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."
"The solution is easy to use."
"I really enjoy using the workflow management."
"We should have the ability to download ARIS EPCs to Visio."
"I could use more icons and other graphical elements."
"There are some things in the collaboration module that could be improved a little, such as the functionality which dynamically pushes notifications to interested people when a process changes during the Release Cycle Management workflow."
"Regarding stability, when there are any customized settings being done at customer end - post upgrade to newer versions - it makes the customer environment unstable for a short duration."
"I had this decentralization mission where I had some friendly fights with the consultants of Software AG. My opinion was the business department should be able to publish their processes and do all their evaluation stuff in ARCM themselves. It has to be a one stop shop. I want a one stop shop to go from ARIS BPM to ARIS ARCM, because having everything go through that would be an improvement due to the inputs that we made with Software AG. They will make it possible that the trigger sent from BPM to ARCM will start their object generation."
"If you want to create new reports then you have to use JavaScript, or ARIS script as they call it, which is beyond the competencies of most people."
"ARIS has an internal fully customizable workflow system called APG, which is very good, but it’s targeted mostly at creating workflows related to ARIS content, and not general workflows to support other processes inside a company."
"In terms of improvement, the app could use some small details and functionalities."
"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."
"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."
"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."
"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."
"We are struggling a bit with integrations."
"There is a considerable learning curve."
"The dashboard has limited features."
"Installation could be made easier."
ARIS BPA is ranked 4th in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while Bonita is ranked 11th in Business Process Design with 27 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while Bonita is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas Bonita is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow and Appian. See our ARIS BPA vs. Bonita report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Esperaba algo mas de este estilo, sin embargo desarrollé esta tabla de comparación de Suites BPM, la cuál no puedo anexar por lo que dejo en formato de texto en caso deque alguien requiera este conocimiento.
Esta tabla fue desarrollada basandome en textos acádemicos de fuentes confiables. Sin embargo no pude encontrar el numero aproximado de clientes que usan ARIS, por lo que si alguien cuenta con esta información se lo agradecería mucho, ya que es el último dato que requiero para completar esta tabla comparativa.
BizAgi Suite, Bonita BPM, IBM Suite, ARIS + Webmethods, AuraPortal, Oracle Suite, Appian eBPM HOPEX
Requiere pago Software licenciado (anual o perpetuo), freeware en versiones académicas Versión pagada (licenciamiento anual) y versión gratuita Software licenciado Software licenciado Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita
Código abierto No Si (GPL) No No No No No No
Diseño intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Requiere tiempo de adaptación Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo
Acceso a licencia de prueba. Si No No Si Si No Si Si
Tutoriales y Soporte técnico Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si
Notación para diagramar BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0
Compatibilidad con base de datos SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, HSQL SQL Server SQL Server, Oracle SQL Server Oracle SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, Oracle
Sistema operativo Windows, Linux Multi-plataforma Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Mac Windows Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Solaris Windows
Monitoreo en tiempo real Si Si Si No Si Si Si Regular
Servicio en la nube Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si
Requiere programación No No Poco Poco No Si Poco No
Número de clientes >500 >1000 >3500 >800 >2000 >2000 >2700
Principales clientes Adidas Group, BBVA, Telefónica, BNP Paribas Xerox, Stanford University, CSC Barclays, Emericon, Banca popolare di Milano, Saperion Fujitsu, Coca Cola, Electrolux, ING, Credit Suisse Toyota, RSA Chile, Coprusa Group, Refinery of the Pacific REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie Amazon, M&T Bank, Nissan, Ford, Baxter Credit Union GNP, P&G, EuroControl, British American Tobacco
Permite importar/exportar archivos BPMN Si Si Si Si Si Solo importación Si Si
Nivel de documentación Medio Alto Medio Alto Alto Medio Bajo Alto
Considera reglas de Negocio Si Si No Si Si No Si Si
Validación de Modelo (diagramas) Si Si Si Si No Si Si
Permite simulación Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No
Requiere conocimiento del producto Poco Poco Normal Poco Poco Normal Normal Poco
Año primera versión lanzada 1989 2001 1998 2009 2001 1997 1999 1994
Accesibilidad móvil Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No
Nivel de seguridad Regular Regular Regular Alto Alto Alto
Facilidad de instalación Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Media Sencilla Media
Versión en español SI Si Si No Si Si No Si
Saludos.