No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apache Airflow vs CMW Tracker comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.3
Apache Airflow offers high ROI with its open-source versatility, efficiently handling tasks despite challenges in precise ROI measurement.
Sentiment score
8.4
CMW Tracker streamlined workflows, reduced risks, increased transparency, lowered costs, standardized processes, and maximized investment returns efficiently.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Apache Airflow users rely on community resources and forums for support, with varying satisfaction levels and minimal direct developer contact.
Sentiment score
7.9
CMW Tracker's customer service is quick and attentive with efficient technical support, though occasional delays exist in uncommon situations.
Forums and community resources like Stack Overflow are helpful.
Team Lead, Data Engineering at Nesine.com
There is enough documentation available, and the community support is good.
Sr. Team Lead - IT at InfoStretch
We can see what bugs are currently being addressed and what fixed versions are released in the official Git repository.
Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Apache Airflow is highly scalable, especially with Kubernetes, praised for flexibility and efficiency in high-volume cloud-native tasks.
Sentiment score
9.1
CMW Tracker scales seamlessly, supporting large teams and diverse workflows, enabling effortless growth without complex setups.
There is an auto-scaling feature called KEDA, which is Kubernetes event-driven auto-scaling offered by Apache Airflow.
Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Apache Airflow scales well, especially when deployed in Kubernetes environments.
Team Lead, Data Engineering at Nesine.com
The solution is very scalable.
Sr. Team Lead - IT at InfoStretch
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Apache Airflow is stable for small deployments, may have issues at scale, and users appreciate its ETL-as-code approach.
Sentiment score
8.5
CMW Tracker is praised for its 98% uptime, stability, reliability, and effective technical support, outperforming other market offerings.
Apache Airflow is stable and I have not experienced significant issues.
Team Lead, Data Engineering at Nesine.com
I would rate the stability of the solution as ten out of ten.
Sr. Team Lead - IT at InfoStretch
I would rate its stability at nine out of ten.
Head of Data at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Apache Airflow needs updates for better error handling, cloud integration, user experience, documentation, and a no-code interface.
CMW Tracker needs frequent updates, interface improvements, API expansion, more reporting, better setup guidance, and a mobile app.
It is not suitable for real-time ETL tasks.
Team Lead, Data Engineering at Nesine.com
If a user is building a data pipeline in Apache Airflow and a user makes a mistake in their code, that makes the scheduler go down and eventually Apache Airflow goes down.
Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
There is no dashboard for us to check all the Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs); a dashboard would help us analyze the work better.
Sr. Team Lead - IT at InfoStretch
 

Setup Cost

Apache Airflow is a cost-effective, open-source solution but may incur expenses for infrastructure and optional commercial support.
CMW Tracker offers cost-effective, user-based licensing with valuable features, easy extensions, and no workforce training required.
It is a sub-feature and not an individual purchase.
Head of Data at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
I prefer using the open-source version rather than the enterprise version, which helps manage costs.
Team Lead, Data Engineering at Nesine.com
Apache Airflow is a community-based platform and is not a licensed product.
Sr. Team Lead - IT at InfoStretch
 

Valuable Features

Apache Airflow excels in flexibility, scalability, integrations, and a clean UI, ideal for Python-savvy teams in data orchestration.
CMW Tracker offers easy deployment, low-code development, and seamless collaboration, excelling in workflow management with budget-friendly integration.
The positive impact and benefits I have seen from using Apache Airflow on my company is that since it is an open-source tool and not licensed, we can get that tool as open source and integrate and modify it as much as we can.
Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Reliability is good, and when integrated with Kubernetes, it performs better compared to on-premises environments.
Team Lead, Data Engineering at Nesine.com
Apache Airflow is an open-source platform that allows easy integration with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.
Sr. Team Lead - IT at InfoStretch
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Airflow
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CMW Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
36th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (35th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Apache Airflow is 3.4%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CMW Tracker is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Apache Airflow3.4%
CMW Tracker1.0%
Other95.6%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2754210 - PeerSpot reviewer
Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Open workflows have simplified data ingestion and curation but still need better UI and scheduler resilience
I think there could be improvements or enhancements in Apache Airflow in terms of having a better UI experience. The UX can be done a bit better. The web interface of Apache Airflow has helped me in tracking and troubleshooting since I'm operational and part of the operational side of Apache Airflow. Mostly, I go into the logs of the web server and scheduler to check what's happening in the back-end instead of looking at the front-end. The UI can give errors related to pipelines, but it can be more improved if we get errors related to import errors and scheduling errors. These areas can be improved. Other than a better UI experience, I would want to see improvements in the scheduler. Sometimes, for user-made mistakes, the scheduler goes down. I experienced this issue and I'm not sure whether it got fixed right now or not. If a user is building a data pipeline in Apache Airflow and a user makes a mistake in their code, that makes the scheduler go down and eventually Apache Airflow goes down. That is not what is expected. If that gets fixed, then it can do wonders.
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Construction Company
31%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Performing Arts
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise24
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What do you like most about Apache Airflow?
Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Airflow?
We don't experience issues with pricing as Apache Airflow is part of a larger platform. It is a sub-feature and not an individual purchase.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Airflow
Comindware Tracker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agari, WePay, Astronomer
Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Airflow vs. CMW Tracker and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.